一件木雕作品 - Lobi - 布基纳法索

05
11
小时
49
分钟
11
当前出价
€ 200
未及保留价
Julien Gauthier
专家
由Julien Gauthier精选

在历史武器、盔甲和非洲艺术方面拥有十年的经验。

估价  € 1,800 - € 2,000
18名其他人正在关注此物品
PT
€200
RO
€185
PT
€175

Catawiki买家保障

在您收到物品之前,您的付款将在我们这里受到安全保管。查看详细信息

Trustpilot 4.4分 | 136208条评论

Trustpilot上被评为优秀。

名为 A wooden sculpture 的木雕,产自布基纳法索的洛比族,归于大师级雕刻家 Bimtiote Dah;重量 2.4 kg,高度 64 cm,品相一般,不含底座。

AI辅助摘要

卖家的描述

A male sculpture attributed to Bimtiote Dah from the Lobi region of Ivory Coast stands upon a dark grey stepped base with wedge-shaped feet and straight, uninterrupted legs rising vertically from the platform. The elongated torso is framed by equally straight arms that fall closely along the sides of the body, while the shoulders are slightly raised and gently rounded. A thick, columnar neck supports an oval head whose features convey a calm and contemplative expression. The figure is carved from a dense, dark wood—possibly sankolo—whose surface now appears somewhat faded with age. Traces of old insect damage are visible on the left shoulder, contributing to the sculpture’s material history and patina.

The informant Binate Kambou with a sculpture of Bimtiote Dah (pre-last photo sequence).

The identification of the sculptor by name was achieved in 2008 through information provided by the Lobi informant Binaté Kambou. According to his testimony, the artist’s birthplace lay near the town of Bouna in Ivory Coast. The carver’s name, he stated, was Bimtiote Dah. Dah worked in the vicinity of Sansana, approximately twenty kilometres south of Gaoua, in the border region between Ivory Coast and Burkina Faso. He died in the early 1990s at roughly seventy years of age. Dah had only one son, who continued ritual activities in the region as a diviner before later settling near Gongonbili in Burkina Faso (status as of 2008). The art dealer Adama Poujougou of Bamako—who in earlier decades had supplied works to the prominent dealers Hélène Leloup and Henri Kamer—confirmed that this Lobi sculptor had once been known locally and had achieved a certain reputation for his works among the Lobi themselves.

Today, according to Poujougou, sculptures by Bimtiote Dah have become rare, largely because “the carver died long ago.” Although the dealer recognized the distinctive character of the sculptures, he did not know the artist’s name. Binaté Kambou, however, was an important informant for numerous ethnologists conducting field research in Lobi territory. Among them was the German ethnologist Klaus Schneider, later director of the Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum in Cologne, who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the so-called “Elephant House” belonging to Kambou’s father. Kambou also assisted independent researchers such as Petra Schütz and Detlev Linse, through whom the present author first came into contact with him.

Son bimtiote dah (penultimate photo sequence).

The sculptor’s son, Kermité Dah (born 1956), served as a ritual specialist and feticheur in the village of Gongonbili and was living in Burkina Faso in 2008. He confirmed that the sculptures documented in this context were works created by his father.

Within Lobi sculpture the attribution of works to a specific individual carver is relatively rare. Most objects were produced within workshop environments, and the identities of their makers were seldom recorded or preserved. When a name such as Bimtiote Dah emerges, it usually indicates either an artist of exceptional local reputation or a workshop tradition associated with a particular locality. According to the documentation of Wolfgang Jaenicke, Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–1990) was active in the region between Bouna in Ivory Coast and Gaoua in Burkina Faso and formed part of a workshop lineage distinguished by a strong and recognizable stylistic identity. His sculptures frequently demonstrate a restrained formal language and a preference for balanced or paired compositions, characteristics consistent with the aesthetic traditions of the Southern Lobi.

Jaenicke’s research—based in part on interviews with Dah’s son, who continued to serve locally as a ritual specialist—confirms that a number of sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah have appeared in prominent European auctions and collections. Such documentation lends these figures both historical and cultural legitimacy, situating them within a traceable lineage of production and within a broader framework of verified provenance and stylistic continuity.

In contrast to the Western artistic tradition, where aesthetic autonomy is frequently celebrated as an end in itself, Lobi sculpture is inseparably bound to function. A Lobi figure does not exist as “art” in the museum sense until it has been removed from its original context. In situ it is understood as an active presence—an entity rather than a representation. Within the domestic shrine it participates in a living system of ritual practice: it is addressed, fed through offerings, consulted through divination, and at times feared as the embodied locus of spiritual agency. Once removed from this environment, however, the figure undergoes a profound ontological transformation. It shifts from sacred instrument to cultural artifact, from an operative presence within a cosmological order to an object of aesthetic contemplation.

This transition raises important questions concerning the ethics of collecting, displaying, and interpreting such works. What is lost when an object that was once ritually nourished, spoken to, and feared becomes part of a private collection or museum inventory? What does it mean to isolate the visual form from the spiritual framework that originally animated it—to separate the object from the ontology within which it once functioned? These questions are not merely theoretical. They touch on the broader tension between the preservation of material culture and the inevitable transformation of meaning that occurs when ritual objects circulate within global systems of art historical classification and market exchange.

photo: wj Examples of the Bitiote Dah workshop (last photo seuence).

Yet the international appreciation of Lobi sculpture has also drawn attention to the philosophical depth of West African spiritual traditions. Collectors and scholars alike have noted the distinctive resistance of the Lobi to colonial centralization and missionary restructuring—historical circumstances that contributed to the relative continuity of their ritual practices and the preservation of their material culture in forms often more intact than those found in neighboring regions. The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah therefore exist not only as striking formal compositions but also as nodes within a dense network of ritual practice, metaphysical belief, historical resilience, and contemporary revaluation.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Within this context, a Lobi sculpture attributed to Dah must be understood as more than a compelling sculptural object. It is the material residue of a worldview in which the visible and invisible are intimately intertwined, and in which carved wood serves as a mediator between human life and the realm of spiritual forces. The quiet gravity of such figures thus speaks not only to the skill of an individual sculptor but also to the enduring intellectual and spiritual coherence of Lobi culture itself—a worldview in which matter and spirit remain deeply and inseparably entangled.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Dah is believed to have been born around 1920 near the town of Bouna in present-day Ivory Coast, though his activity is more closely associated with villages in the Lobi region around Gaoua in southern Burkina Faso. Accounts collected from local informants situate him among a group of highly respected ritual specialists who combined carving with knowledge of local religious practices. The first explicit identification of the sculptor by name appears to have emerged through oral testimony gathered in the region, notably from the Lobi informant Binathé Kambou, who recognized specific sculptures as the work of Bimtiote Dah. This attribution was subsequently confirmed by the sculptor’s son, himself active as a ritual specialist in the family village of Sansana. The convergence of these testimonies, recorded during research conducted in the early twenty-first century, provided the basis for the recognition of Bimtiote Dah as an individual artist within the Lobi tradition.

Within Lobi cosmology the carved wooden figures commonly known as bateba serve as material embodiments or intermediaries for spiritual forces called thila. These spirits are believed to inhabit the landscape and to communicate with humans through diviners, prescribing the creation of particular sculptural forms in order to restore equilibrium within the household or community. The resulting figures are therefore not conceived as aesthetic objects in the Western sense but as functional agents intended to mediate protection, healing, or moral order.

The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah participate fully in this religious framework yet display a distinctive formal coherence that has attracted the attention of collectors and scholars of African art. His figures typically stand in a strong frontal pose, carved from a single block of hardwood and characterized by a compact volumetric structure. The bodies are often rendered with an emphatic verticality, broad shoulders, and slightly shortened limbs, producing a sense of mass and stability. Facial features tend toward geometric simplification: the head is frequently cylindrical or slightly elongated, with deeply set eyes and a restrained, closed expression that contributes to the solemnity of the figure’s presence. Surface treatment is generally spare, allowing the essential forms of the sculpture to dominate. Over time the wood develops a dense patina through ritual handling and the application of sacrificial substances, traces of which often remain visible on surviving works.

Such formal characteristics situate Dah’s sculptures within the broader corpus of Lobi carving while also revealing a particular sensitivity to proportion and balance. Scholars have noted the sculptor’s preference for concentrated volumes and minimal ornamentation, qualities that produce a striking visual gravity. Although comparisons have sometimes been drawn between the frontal monumentality of these figures and the compositional principles of ancient Mediterranean or Egyptian statuary, these similarities arise independently within the Lobi cultural context and reflect the sculptor’s concern with the spiritual efficacy rather than the representational accuracy of the form.

The recognition of Bimtiote Dah as a named artist illustrates the methodological challenges inherent in the study of African sculpture produced outside written artistic traditions. Attributions often rely on a combination of stylistic analysis, field research, and the memories of local communities who retain knowledge of past carvers and ritual specialists. In the case of Dah, the identification by Binathé Kambou and the confirmation by the artist’s son have provided a rare documentary anchor for a body of works whose stylistic coherence had long suggested the presence of an individual master.

Today sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah appear in important private collections and in museums devoted to African art. Their presence in these contexts reflects the broader transformation of ritual objects into works valued within the global art market and museum system, a shift that began during the twentieth century as European and American collectors developed an increasing interest in the sculptural traditions of West Africa. At the same time, the original religious significance of such figures remains central to their interpretation. Within Lobi communities the bateba were never intended as isolated works of art but as participants in a living spiritual network linking human beings, ancestors, and the unseen forces that govern the natural and moral order.

In this sense the work of Bimtiote Dah occupies a complex position between local religious practice and international recognition. His sculptures continue to testify to the vitality of Lobi spiritual traditions while also illustrating the ways in which individual artistic voices could emerge within those traditions, even in the absence of written documentation or formal artistic institutions. Through their restrained forms and concentrated presence, the figures attributed to Dah convey the profound seriousness with which sculpture functioned within Lobi society, embodying the protective and mediating powers entrusted to them by the spiritual world.

Publizierte Werke von Bimtioté Dah

Ketterer Münshen 12/1989, Nr. 133
Christies NY 11/194, Nr.131
St. Germain-en-Laye 11/1995, Nr. 170
Massa Laurent 2001, Vereinigte Staaten 116, Nr. 80
Sigals 06/2002, S. 116, Nr. 80
Simon Blais Montreal 2007, Vereinigte Staaten 12, Nr. 130
Qittenbaum München 2008, Nr. 80
Sammlung Greschik, 2016,Werkgruppe 1, S. 128/129.

Ausgestellt 2016 in Wittenberg
die Sammlung Rainer Greschik Lobi,
Die Entdeckung des Individuums 2016

Sammlung Katsouros
Sammlung Greschik
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke

CAB38191

卖家故事

沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克的对非洲艺术的投入并非始于田野或市场,而是在一个更安静、更内在的空间——在父亲的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非为了讲出一个单一的故事;它暗示着多种可能。它邀请审视而非崇敬,并让贾艾尼克在早年就明白,物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部携带时间——断裂与延续以同样的形式共存——并请人像对待文本那样去解读它们。 二十多年多来,贾艾尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都不能完全概括他的实践形态。曾经较为随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从未是一个封闭或历史性的类别。它更像是一组活生生的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史与比较法——提供了一个语法;语言本身则在别处学得。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复的相遇逐步显现,逐步变成关系,并通过信任在多年里一点点建立起来。 马里成为这段经历的重力中心。2002年至2012年间,贾艾尼克在巴马科和塞古居住并工作,经营着Tribalartforum,一家俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抵抗简单的年表化叙述。雕塑与陶器与摄影共处同一房间,马利克·西德比(Malick Sidibé)的作品——70年代昔日马里的青年形象,充满自信与热情——与更古老的仪式形式并列挂着。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是澄清:过去与现在并不彼此抵消,而是相互锐化。 2012年的战争突然结束了这一阶段,正如战争常常所做的那样。但它并未消解这份工作。与阿吉布·卡马特(Aguibou Kamaté)一起,贾艾尼克在洛美重新集结,离许多物件的来源地更近,也离它们继续行走的路线更近。自2018年以来,柏林成为这张地图上的又一个节点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现设在夏洛滕堡皇宫对面,由一支小型专家团队支撑。其重点,尤其聚焦于西非青铜器与陶土器——这类以土与火为塑造材料,又以记忆形式抵御轻易翻译的材料。 贾艾尼克的实践之所以与众不同,不仅在于它的地理范围,还在于其内部张力。田野工作与来源研究并行;商业活动与责任感被视为不可分割。与博物馆及学术机构的合作中,流通被框定为一种伦理过程,而非单纯的掠取。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存起来,而是让它们在世界中保持可读性——在其言语的条件改变之时,仍使它们继续发声。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke 是一家驻柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具以及当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克掌舵,他的工作结合了收藏、经销、来源研究、田野考察与档案文献记录。 据画廊自述,贾艾尼克学习了民族学、艺术史与比较法,在非洲艺术领域从业超过二十五年。他的活动通过在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与而发展起来。他并非将非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为由活生生的社区和不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯的一个特别重要阶段是在马里,约2002年至2012年间在巴马科和塞古居住、工作。在那里他经营Tribalartforum,一家将历史性非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合起来的画廊,包括马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年马里的政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动关闭。 随后,贾艾尼克与阿吉布·卡马特一起继续在洛美、多哥工作,然后在柏林夏洛滕堡宫附近建立画廊。画廊尤为强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与贝宁及伊菲相关作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、道贡(Dogon)艺术、包雷(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件以及约鲁巴材料等。 贾艾尼克公共立场的一个独特之处在于他反复强调来源透明度和赔偿辩论。在若干已发表的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文书、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和赔偿研究人员的沟通等问题。这些陈述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛辩论。 画廊维持着大量线上档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括贝宁与伊菲青铜器、诺克陶土、道贡雕塑、包雷人像、丰(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易史的学者而言,贾艾尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人物更后期的一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后纽约市场的1950年代至1970年代,而贾艾尼克的工作则受现代议题的影响:田野文档、来源研究、赔偿讨论、数字档案以及与西非网络与艺术家直接接触。 本文本基于人工智能信息
使用Google翻译翻译

A male sculpture attributed to Bimtiote Dah from the Lobi region of Ivory Coast stands upon a dark grey stepped base with wedge-shaped feet and straight, uninterrupted legs rising vertically from the platform. The elongated torso is framed by equally straight arms that fall closely along the sides of the body, while the shoulders are slightly raised and gently rounded. A thick, columnar neck supports an oval head whose features convey a calm and contemplative expression. The figure is carved from a dense, dark wood—possibly sankolo—whose surface now appears somewhat faded with age. Traces of old insect damage are visible on the left shoulder, contributing to the sculpture’s material history and patina.

The informant Binate Kambou with a sculpture of Bimtiote Dah (pre-last photo sequence).

The identification of the sculptor by name was achieved in 2008 through information provided by the Lobi informant Binaté Kambou. According to his testimony, the artist’s birthplace lay near the town of Bouna in Ivory Coast. The carver’s name, he stated, was Bimtiote Dah. Dah worked in the vicinity of Sansana, approximately twenty kilometres south of Gaoua, in the border region between Ivory Coast and Burkina Faso. He died in the early 1990s at roughly seventy years of age. Dah had only one son, who continued ritual activities in the region as a diviner before later settling near Gongonbili in Burkina Faso (status as of 2008). The art dealer Adama Poujougou of Bamako—who in earlier decades had supplied works to the prominent dealers Hélène Leloup and Henri Kamer—confirmed that this Lobi sculptor had once been known locally and had achieved a certain reputation for his works among the Lobi themselves.

Today, according to Poujougou, sculptures by Bimtiote Dah have become rare, largely because “the carver died long ago.” Although the dealer recognized the distinctive character of the sculptures, he did not know the artist’s name. Binaté Kambou, however, was an important informant for numerous ethnologists conducting field research in Lobi territory. Among them was the German ethnologist Klaus Schneider, later director of the Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum in Cologne, who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the so-called “Elephant House” belonging to Kambou’s father. Kambou also assisted independent researchers such as Petra Schütz and Detlev Linse, through whom the present author first came into contact with him.

Son bimtiote dah (penultimate photo sequence).

The sculptor’s son, Kermité Dah (born 1956), served as a ritual specialist and feticheur in the village of Gongonbili and was living in Burkina Faso in 2008. He confirmed that the sculptures documented in this context were works created by his father.

Within Lobi sculpture the attribution of works to a specific individual carver is relatively rare. Most objects were produced within workshop environments, and the identities of their makers were seldom recorded or preserved. When a name such as Bimtiote Dah emerges, it usually indicates either an artist of exceptional local reputation or a workshop tradition associated with a particular locality. According to the documentation of Wolfgang Jaenicke, Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–1990) was active in the region between Bouna in Ivory Coast and Gaoua in Burkina Faso and formed part of a workshop lineage distinguished by a strong and recognizable stylistic identity. His sculptures frequently demonstrate a restrained formal language and a preference for balanced or paired compositions, characteristics consistent with the aesthetic traditions of the Southern Lobi.

Jaenicke’s research—based in part on interviews with Dah’s son, who continued to serve locally as a ritual specialist—confirms that a number of sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah have appeared in prominent European auctions and collections. Such documentation lends these figures both historical and cultural legitimacy, situating them within a traceable lineage of production and within a broader framework of verified provenance and stylistic continuity.

In contrast to the Western artistic tradition, where aesthetic autonomy is frequently celebrated as an end in itself, Lobi sculpture is inseparably bound to function. A Lobi figure does not exist as “art” in the museum sense until it has been removed from its original context. In situ it is understood as an active presence—an entity rather than a representation. Within the domestic shrine it participates in a living system of ritual practice: it is addressed, fed through offerings, consulted through divination, and at times feared as the embodied locus of spiritual agency. Once removed from this environment, however, the figure undergoes a profound ontological transformation. It shifts from sacred instrument to cultural artifact, from an operative presence within a cosmological order to an object of aesthetic contemplation.

This transition raises important questions concerning the ethics of collecting, displaying, and interpreting such works. What is lost when an object that was once ritually nourished, spoken to, and feared becomes part of a private collection or museum inventory? What does it mean to isolate the visual form from the spiritual framework that originally animated it—to separate the object from the ontology within which it once functioned? These questions are not merely theoretical. They touch on the broader tension between the preservation of material culture and the inevitable transformation of meaning that occurs when ritual objects circulate within global systems of art historical classification and market exchange.

photo: wj Examples of the Bitiote Dah workshop (last photo seuence).

Yet the international appreciation of Lobi sculpture has also drawn attention to the philosophical depth of West African spiritual traditions. Collectors and scholars alike have noted the distinctive resistance of the Lobi to colonial centralization and missionary restructuring—historical circumstances that contributed to the relative continuity of their ritual practices and the preservation of their material culture in forms often more intact than those found in neighboring regions. The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah therefore exist not only as striking formal compositions but also as nodes within a dense network of ritual practice, metaphysical belief, historical resilience, and contemporary revaluation.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Within this context, a Lobi sculpture attributed to Dah must be understood as more than a compelling sculptural object. It is the material residue of a worldview in which the visible and invisible are intimately intertwined, and in which carved wood serves as a mediator between human life and the realm of spiritual forces. The quiet gravity of such figures thus speaks not only to the skill of an individual sculptor but also to the enduring intellectual and spiritual coherence of Lobi culture itself—a worldview in which matter and spirit remain deeply and inseparably entangled.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Dah is believed to have been born around 1920 near the town of Bouna in present-day Ivory Coast, though his activity is more closely associated with villages in the Lobi region around Gaoua in southern Burkina Faso. Accounts collected from local informants situate him among a group of highly respected ritual specialists who combined carving with knowledge of local religious practices. The first explicit identification of the sculptor by name appears to have emerged through oral testimony gathered in the region, notably from the Lobi informant Binathé Kambou, who recognized specific sculptures as the work of Bimtiote Dah. This attribution was subsequently confirmed by the sculptor’s son, himself active as a ritual specialist in the family village of Sansana. The convergence of these testimonies, recorded during research conducted in the early twenty-first century, provided the basis for the recognition of Bimtiote Dah as an individual artist within the Lobi tradition.

Within Lobi cosmology the carved wooden figures commonly known as bateba serve as material embodiments or intermediaries for spiritual forces called thila. These spirits are believed to inhabit the landscape and to communicate with humans through diviners, prescribing the creation of particular sculptural forms in order to restore equilibrium within the household or community. The resulting figures are therefore not conceived as aesthetic objects in the Western sense but as functional agents intended to mediate protection, healing, or moral order.

The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah participate fully in this religious framework yet display a distinctive formal coherence that has attracted the attention of collectors and scholars of African art. His figures typically stand in a strong frontal pose, carved from a single block of hardwood and characterized by a compact volumetric structure. The bodies are often rendered with an emphatic verticality, broad shoulders, and slightly shortened limbs, producing a sense of mass and stability. Facial features tend toward geometric simplification: the head is frequently cylindrical or slightly elongated, with deeply set eyes and a restrained, closed expression that contributes to the solemnity of the figure’s presence. Surface treatment is generally spare, allowing the essential forms of the sculpture to dominate. Over time the wood develops a dense patina through ritual handling and the application of sacrificial substances, traces of which often remain visible on surviving works.

Such formal characteristics situate Dah’s sculptures within the broader corpus of Lobi carving while also revealing a particular sensitivity to proportion and balance. Scholars have noted the sculptor’s preference for concentrated volumes and minimal ornamentation, qualities that produce a striking visual gravity. Although comparisons have sometimes been drawn between the frontal monumentality of these figures and the compositional principles of ancient Mediterranean or Egyptian statuary, these similarities arise independently within the Lobi cultural context and reflect the sculptor’s concern with the spiritual efficacy rather than the representational accuracy of the form.

The recognition of Bimtiote Dah as a named artist illustrates the methodological challenges inherent in the study of African sculpture produced outside written artistic traditions. Attributions often rely on a combination of stylistic analysis, field research, and the memories of local communities who retain knowledge of past carvers and ritual specialists. In the case of Dah, the identification by Binathé Kambou and the confirmation by the artist’s son have provided a rare documentary anchor for a body of works whose stylistic coherence had long suggested the presence of an individual master.

Today sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah appear in important private collections and in museums devoted to African art. Their presence in these contexts reflects the broader transformation of ritual objects into works valued within the global art market and museum system, a shift that began during the twentieth century as European and American collectors developed an increasing interest in the sculptural traditions of West Africa. At the same time, the original religious significance of such figures remains central to their interpretation. Within Lobi communities the bateba were never intended as isolated works of art but as participants in a living spiritual network linking human beings, ancestors, and the unseen forces that govern the natural and moral order.

In this sense the work of Bimtiote Dah occupies a complex position between local religious practice and international recognition. His sculptures continue to testify to the vitality of Lobi spiritual traditions while also illustrating the ways in which individual artistic voices could emerge within those traditions, even in the absence of written documentation or formal artistic institutions. Through their restrained forms and concentrated presence, the figures attributed to Dah convey the profound seriousness with which sculpture functioned within Lobi society, embodying the protective and mediating powers entrusted to them by the spiritual world.

Publizierte Werke von Bimtioté Dah

Ketterer Münshen 12/1989, Nr. 133
Christies NY 11/194, Nr.131
St. Germain-en-Laye 11/1995, Nr. 170
Massa Laurent 2001, Vereinigte Staaten 116, Nr. 80
Sigals 06/2002, S. 116, Nr. 80
Simon Blais Montreal 2007, Vereinigte Staaten 12, Nr. 130
Qittenbaum München 2008, Nr. 80
Sammlung Greschik, 2016,Werkgruppe 1, S. 128/129.

Ausgestellt 2016 in Wittenberg
die Sammlung Rainer Greschik Lobi,
Die Entdeckung des Individuums 2016

Sammlung Katsouros
Sammlung Greschik
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke

CAB38191

卖家故事

沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克的对非洲艺术的投入并非始于田野或市场,而是在一个更安静、更内在的空间——在父亲的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非为了讲出一个单一的故事;它暗示着多种可能。它邀请审视而非崇敬,并让贾艾尼克在早年就明白,物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部携带时间——断裂与延续以同样的形式共存——并请人像对待文本那样去解读它们。 二十多年多来,贾艾尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都不能完全概括他的实践形态。曾经较为随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从未是一个封闭或历史性的类别。它更像是一组活生生的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史与比较法——提供了一个语法;语言本身则在别处学得。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复的相遇逐步显现,逐步变成关系,并通过信任在多年里一点点建立起来。 马里成为这段经历的重力中心。2002年至2012年间,贾艾尼克在巴马科和塞古居住并工作,经营着Tribalartforum,一家俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抵抗简单的年表化叙述。雕塑与陶器与摄影共处同一房间,马利克·西德比(Malick Sidibé)的作品——70年代昔日马里的青年形象,充满自信与热情——与更古老的仪式形式并列挂着。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是澄清:过去与现在并不彼此抵消,而是相互锐化。 2012年的战争突然结束了这一阶段,正如战争常常所做的那样。但它并未消解这份工作。与阿吉布·卡马特(Aguibou Kamaté)一起,贾艾尼克在洛美重新集结,离许多物件的来源地更近,也离它们继续行走的路线更近。自2018年以来,柏林成为这张地图上的又一个节点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现设在夏洛滕堡皇宫对面,由一支小型专家团队支撑。其重点,尤其聚焦于西非青铜器与陶土器——这类以土与火为塑造材料,又以记忆形式抵御轻易翻译的材料。 贾艾尼克的实践之所以与众不同,不仅在于它的地理范围,还在于其内部张力。田野工作与来源研究并行;商业活动与责任感被视为不可分割。与博物馆及学术机构的合作中,流通被框定为一种伦理过程,而非单纯的掠取。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存起来,而是让它们在世界中保持可读性——在其言语的条件改变之时,仍使它们继续发声。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke 是一家驻柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具以及当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克掌舵,他的工作结合了收藏、经销、来源研究、田野考察与档案文献记录。 据画廊自述,贾艾尼克学习了民族学、艺术史与比较法,在非洲艺术领域从业超过二十五年。他的活动通过在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与而发展起来。他并非将非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为由活生生的社区和不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯的一个特别重要阶段是在马里,约2002年至2012年间在巴马科和塞古居住、工作。在那里他经营Tribalartforum,一家将历史性非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合起来的画廊,包括马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年马里的政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动关闭。 随后,贾艾尼克与阿吉布·卡马特一起继续在洛美、多哥工作,然后在柏林夏洛滕堡宫附近建立画廊。画廊尤为强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与贝宁及伊菲相关作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、道贡(Dogon)艺术、包雷(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件以及约鲁巴材料等。 贾艾尼克公共立场的一个独特之处在于他反复强调来源透明度和赔偿辩论。在若干已发表的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文书、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和赔偿研究人员的沟通等问题。这些陈述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛辩论。 画廊维持着大量线上档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括贝宁与伊菲青铜器、诺克陶土、道贡雕塑、包雷人像、丰(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易史的学者而言,贾艾尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人物更后期的一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后纽约市场的1950年代至1970年代,而贾艾尼克的工作则受现代议题的影响:田野文档、来源研究、赔偿讨论、数字档案以及与西非网络与艺术家直接接触。 本文本基于人工智能信息
使用Google翻译翻译

详细资料

Ethnic group/ culture
Lobi
原产国
布基纳法索
材质
Sold with stand
不是
状态
情况尚佳
艺术品标题
A wooden sculpture
高度
64 cm
重量
2,4 kg
德国经验证
6418
已售出的几件物品
99,46%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

类似物品

类别为您准备的

非洲及部落艺术