一件木雕作品 - Prampram - 加纳 (没有保留价)





Catawiki买家保障
在您收到物品之前,您的付款将在我们这里受到安全保管。查看详细信息
Trustpilot 4.4分 | 136487条评论
在Trustpilot上被评为优秀。
原装木雕作品,题为《A wooden sculpture》,来自加纳南部地区Prampram,由Prampram族群创作,含底座,高度89厘米,重量2.6千克,原厂正品并提供出处信息。
卖家的描述
Prampram statue,Southern Region,Prampram village,Ghana。Incl stand。
This wooden figure from Prampram in the southern coastal region of Ghana belongs to the sculptural traditions associated with Ga-Adangbe communities along the Gulf of Guinea. Prampram,historically situated within a network of fishing settlements,trading routes,and shrine centers east of Accra,developed a rich visual culture shaped by interactions among Ga,Dangme,Akan,and Ewe-speaking populations. Sculptural production in this region cannot be understood solely through formal analysis,since figures were embedded within complex systems of ritual practice,lineage memory,spiritual mediation,and local political authority. Carved figures wearing loin cloths appear in a variety of shrine and domestic contexts,where clothing itself functioned not merely as ornament but as a marker of social identity,bodily discipline,and ritual propriety.
The present figure demonstrates the restrained monumentality characteristic of many southern Ghanaian shrine sculptures. The body is rendered with an emphasis on frontal balance and concentrated presence rather than anatomical naturalism. Facial features are often enlarged or stylized in order to intensify the figure’s spiritual efficacy,while the abbreviated treatment of musculature and bodily proportion reflects sculptural conventions prioritizing symbolic clarity over individualized representation. The loin cloth establishes both modesty and status,situating the figure within recognizable social and cultural frameworks. In many Ghanaian sculptural traditions,textiles and wrapped garments signified adulthood,moral order,and participation within community structures; even minimally rendered clothing could therefore carry substantial symbolic weight.
Among Ga-Adangbe communities,carved figures were frequently connected to shrine practices involving tutelary spirits,ancestral powers,healing cults,or protective deities associated with land and sea. Such figures often accumulated libations,pigments,sacrificial matter,and ritual handling over extended periods of use,resulting in surfaces marked by abrasion,darkening,encrustation,and repair. These material traces should be understood as evidence of activation rather than deterioration. The object’s efficacy derived not simply from its carved form but from the ongoing ritual relationships maintained around it. As in many West African religious systems,the distinction between image and presence remained deliberately unstable: the sculpture functioned simultaneously as representation,receptacle,and participant within ritual exchange.
The coastal position of Prampram also places such works within broader histories of Atlantic contact and transformation. From the seventeenth century onward,southern Ghana became deeply entangled in European commercial networks,missionary activity,and colonial administration. Nevertheless,local sculptural traditions persisted through adaptation rather than disappearance. Shrine figures continued to be commissioned and used even as imported textiles,Christianity,Islam,and new forms of political authority reshaped coastal society. The coexistence of continuity and change is visible in many twentieth-century Ghanaian sculptures,where older ritual forms intersect with evolving material conditions and regional artistic exchanges.
The relative simplicity of the figure’s attire intensifies the sculptural emphasis on bodily presence. The loin cloth acts as a minimal but crucial visual anchor,distinguishing the represented body from abstraction while preserving the concentrated austerity characteristic of shrine sculpture. Such restraint reflects broader aesthetic values in many West African traditions,where controlled reduction and formal economy often produce heightened expressive force. Rather than functioning as decorative surplus,each carved element contributes to the figure’s ritual and symbolic coherence.
References
C*A*B*4*9*5*0*6*
Herbert M. Cole and Doran H. Ross, The Arts of Ghana, University of California, Museum of Cultural History, Los Angeles, 1977.
Marion Kilson, Kpele Lala: Ga Religious Songs and Symbols, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971.
Robert Sutherland Rattray, Religion and Art in Ashanti, Oxford University Press, London, 1927.
Enid Schildkrout and Curtis A. Keim, African Reflections: Art from Northeastern Zaire, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, 1990.
Wyatt MacGaffey, Religion and Society in Central Africa: The BaKongo of Lower Zaire, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.
Labelle Prussin, African Nomadic Architecture: Space, Place and Gender, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 1995.
Ghana Museums and Monuments Board, consulted 2026.
C*A*B*4*9*5*0*6*
The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.
卖家故事
Prampram statue,Southern Region,Prampram village,Ghana。Incl stand。
This wooden figure from Prampram in the southern coastal region of Ghana belongs to the sculptural traditions associated with Ga-Adangbe communities along the Gulf of Guinea. Prampram,historically situated within a network of fishing settlements,trading routes,and shrine centers east of Accra,developed a rich visual culture shaped by interactions among Ga,Dangme,Akan,and Ewe-speaking populations. Sculptural production in this region cannot be understood solely through formal analysis,since figures were embedded within complex systems of ritual practice,lineage memory,spiritual mediation,and local political authority. Carved figures wearing loin cloths appear in a variety of shrine and domestic contexts,where clothing itself functioned not merely as ornament but as a marker of social identity,bodily discipline,and ritual propriety.
The present figure demonstrates the restrained monumentality characteristic of many southern Ghanaian shrine sculptures. The body is rendered with an emphasis on frontal balance and concentrated presence rather than anatomical naturalism. Facial features are often enlarged or stylized in order to intensify the figure’s spiritual efficacy,while the abbreviated treatment of musculature and bodily proportion reflects sculptural conventions prioritizing symbolic clarity over individualized representation. The loin cloth establishes both modesty and status,situating the figure within recognizable social and cultural frameworks. In many Ghanaian sculptural traditions,textiles and wrapped garments signified adulthood,moral order,and participation within community structures; even minimally rendered clothing could therefore carry substantial symbolic weight.
Among Ga-Adangbe communities,carved figures were frequently connected to shrine practices involving tutelary spirits,ancestral powers,healing cults,or protective deities associated with land and sea. Such figures often accumulated libations,pigments,sacrificial matter,and ritual handling over extended periods of use,resulting in surfaces marked by abrasion,darkening,encrustation,and repair. These material traces should be understood as evidence of activation rather than deterioration. The object’s efficacy derived not simply from its carved form but from the ongoing ritual relationships maintained around it. As in many West African religious systems,the distinction between image and presence remained deliberately unstable: the sculpture functioned simultaneously as representation,receptacle,and participant within ritual exchange.
The coastal position of Prampram also places such works within broader histories of Atlantic contact and transformation. From the seventeenth century onward,southern Ghana became deeply entangled in European commercial networks,missionary activity,and colonial administration. Nevertheless,local sculptural traditions persisted through adaptation rather than disappearance. Shrine figures continued to be commissioned and used even as imported textiles,Christianity,Islam,and new forms of political authority reshaped coastal society. The coexistence of continuity and change is visible in many twentieth-century Ghanaian sculptures,where older ritual forms intersect with evolving material conditions and regional artistic exchanges.
The relative simplicity of the figure’s attire intensifies the sculptural emphasis on bodily presence. The loin cloth acts as a minimal but crucial visual anchor,distinguishing the represented body from abstraction while preserving the concentrated austerity characteristic of shrine sculpture. Such restraint reflects broader aesthetic values in many West African traditions,where controlled reduction and formal economy often produce heightened expressive force. Rather than functioning as decorative surplus,each carved element contributes to the figure’s ritual and symbolic coherence.
References
C*A*B*4*9*5*0*6*
Herbert M. Cole and Doran H. Ross, The Arts of Ghana, University of California, Museum of Cultural History, Los Angeles, 1977.
Marion Kilson, Kpele Lala: Ga Religious Songs and Symbols, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971.
Robert Sutherland Rattray, Religion and Art in Ashanti, Oxford University Press, London, 1927.
Enid Schildkrout and Curtis A. Keim, African Reflections: Art from Northeastern Zaire, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, 1990.
Wyatt MacGaffey, Religion and Society in Central Africa: The BaKongo of Lower Zaire, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.
Labelle Prussin, African Nomadic Architecture: Space, Place and Gender, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 1995.
Ghana Museums and Monuments Board, consulted 2026.
C*A*B*4*9*5*0*6*
The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.
卖家故事
详细资料
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

