“Ceci n’est pas un visage” brings together two conceptions of reality that at first seem far removed from one another: the highly developed realism of the art of Ife and the poetic Surrealism of René Magritte. At the centre stands the fragment of a head. It possesses eyes, a nose and a mouth, the familiar signs of a human face, yet it resists the idea of a complete visage. The breaks remain visible; substantial parts are missing. Precisely because of this incompleteness, the work raises a fundamental question: how little of a face needs to remain for us still to recognise a face? Incl stand. The portrait art of Ife, which flourished between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries in present-day Nigeria, is renowned for a mode of representation often described as naturalistic or realistic. Its heads and figures combine precisely modelled human physiognomy with a rigorous formal order. Characteristic vertical lines structure the surfaces of many of these faces. The realism of Ife therefore cannot simply be understood as the faithful imitation of an individual person. Likeness, idealised presence, social significance and highly controlled artistic form come together to produce a distinctive reality of the image. A fragment fundamentally alters this reality. What was once a head becomes, through loss, an object suspended between presence and absence. The fragment preserves the idea of a whole even though that whole no longer exists materially. An eye is enough for us to imagine a gaze. A mouth produces the possibility of expression. A nose continues to organise the remaining features. The viewer instinctively completes what is missing. A fragment, then, is not merely a damaged whole. It is a particular form of image in which what is absent becomes as active as what remains visible. It is at this point that the realism of Ife encounters Magritte’s Surrealism. Magritte, too, depicted things with striking representational clarity. Bowler hats, clouds, windows, rooms and human figures appear precise, recognisable and almost ordinary. The surreal does not arise from the dissolution of visible reality, but from its seemingly rational depiction. Each individual object appears real; what becomes unreal is the relationship between those objects. It is precisely the realism of the painting that makes the contradiction convincing. The black bowler hat, the isolated male figure, the view towards sea and sky, and the uncertain relationship between interior and exterior all evoke Magritte’s visual vocabulary. Above all, however, the phrase “Ceci n’est pas un visage” recalls Magritte’s celebrated interrogation of the relationship between image, word and object. The statement initially contradicts what seems immediately apparent. Of course we see a face. And yet we do not. What stands before us is neither a living person nor a complete head, but the image of a fragment that itself refers to an image of a once-complete human being. Magritte’s question about the reality of representation thus acquires another dimension through its encounter with the Ife fragment. The fragment is materially part of an object, yet simultaneously a sign of a lost whole. It is matter and imagination, presence and absence. Its damaged condition exposes a distinction between the head and the face: the head is a physical, sculptural form, while the visage is to a considerable degree created through perception. We assemble its parts, interpret eyes as a gaze and a mouth as expression, and construct a human presence from what remains and from what is missing. In “Ceci n’est pas un visage”, two forms of realism therefore confront one another. One relies on the extraordinary sculptural presence of the human image; the other employs the precise representation of the visible world in order to destabilise our confidence in it. The realism of Ife allows the fragment, despite its losses, to retain the force of human presence. Magritte’s Surrealism makes that apparently self-evident presence uncertain. What, then, is the fragment of a visage? The remnant of a destroyed whole, an autonomous work of art, a historical body, a sign of absence, or already a complete image reconstructed in our imagination? The fragment does not answer these questions. It keeps them open. Perhaps this is where an unexpected proximity between Ife and Magritte emerges: both demonstrate that realism does not mean that image and reality are identical. The more convincingly a face appears before us, the more insistent the question becomes: where does this face actually exist—in the object, in the image, or in the gaze of the beholder? Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright. Invt. No. MAZ21735 TL Test Kotalla 340 years +/- 26 % The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.