一件陶土雕塑 - 查姆 - 尼日利亚 (没有保留价)

04
天
04
小时
54
分钟
06
秒
开始出价
€ 1
没有保留价
Dimitri André
专家
由Dimitri André精选

拥有非洲研究硕士学位及非洲艺术15年工作经验。

估价  € 280 - € 330
没有出价记录

Catawiki买家保障

在您收到物品之前,您的付款将在我们这里受到安全保管。查看详细信息

Trustpilot 4.4分 | 143878条评论

在Trustpilot上被评为优秀。

尼日利亚产的陶土雕塑,归属 Cham(Chamba)族,阿达马瓦地区,复制品。

AI辅助摘要

卖家的描述

Cham Terracotta Sculpture – Anthropomorphic Ritual Vessel with Sculpted Figurative Decoration

Origin: Adamawa Region, Nigeria

Cultural Attribution: Cham (Chamba), attributed

Material: Fired clay, modeled, with applied ornaments, incised decoration, and an ochre to reddish-brown surface

Dating: Uncertain

Description

This anthropomorphic terracotta vessel from the Adamawa Region in eastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally complex sculptural design, in which the human figure, vessel body, and ornamental elements merge into a cohesive sculptural unity. The towering object has a voluminous, almost egg-shaped lower body that tapers upwards to a richly modeled human bust. Above the robust upper body, adorned with sculpted details, rises an elongated neck, crowned by a large, expressively sculpted head. Particularly striking is the wide-open, almost circular mouth, deeply incised into the face and possibly also forming a functional opening for the vessel. The nose is strongly emphasized, while the eyes are suggested by small, incised or impressed depressions. The face is framed laterally by sculpted elements that can be interpreted as earrings, sections of hair, or ornamental pendants. The tall, arched headdress or hairstyle is adorned with regularly arranged, relief-like stripes and incised lines. A horizontal, ribbed band marks the transition between the forehead and the headdress. An angled arm rises to the side of the head, its hand with spread fingers clearly visible. The gesture conveys the impression of an invocation, greeting, or ceremonial act, though its original meaning remains unclear. The torso is decorated with numerous sculpted, arched, and band-like elements, their surfaces structured by regular indentations. Some of these forms resemble necklaces, textile appliqués, or stylized body ornaments. The body of the vessel has a relatively smooth, slightly convex surface, bordered by circumferential, three-dimensional bands. Several elongated, ribbed appliqués develop in the lower section, extending to the widened base. The reddish-brown to sand-colored terracotta shows numerous abrasions, small chips, cracks, and irregular discolorations. Material losses are particularly evident on the projecting ornaments. The preserved surface suggests a long history, but does not allow for a definitive statement about the object's actual age or original storage conditions.

Cultural and Geographical Context

The Cham, sometimes discussed in ethnographic literature in the broader context of the Chamba groups, are among the ethnic groups of northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas are located primarily in the Gongola River system and adjacent regions of present-day Adamawa State and southern Gombe State. The region forms a cultural transition zone between the Nigerian highlands, the savannahs of the Benue Basin, and the western foothills of the Cameroon Highlands. Its history is characterized by intensive contact between diverse population groups, including the Cham, Longuda, Waja, Tula, and other communities. Within this cultural landscape, a variety of ceramic traditions developed, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic terracotta figures. Figurative vessels, whose human or animal appearance may be associated with a possible ritual use, are particularly well-known. However, the precise cultural attribution of individual objects is often difficult, as manufacturing techniques, ornamentation, and religious beliefs overlap between neighboring communities. For the present vessel, attribution to the Cham is plausible based on its documented origin and its characteristic combination of anthropomorphic modeling and ceramic vessel form. However, a definitive identification would require additional ethnographic information, comparative objects, or a documented provenance.

Iconography and Symbolism

The iconographic design of the vessel is defined by the combination of a human figure with a voluminous ceramic body. The large, wide-open mouth is particularly striking, lending the face extraordinary expressiveness. In various African pictorial traditions, the depiction can be interpreted as a The open mouth could be associated with speech, song, invocation, or the transmission of spiritual messages. However, in the case of a ceramic vessel, the possibility that the opening served a practical function, such as filling or pouring liquids, must also be considered. The striking hand position with spread fingers could indicate a ceremonial gesture. A depiction of communication or social interaction is also conceivable. Without ethnographic evidence, a concrete interpretation remains speculative. The elaborate head design and numerous sculptural ornamentation suggest a prominent figure whose appearance is characterized by distinctive attributes. The ribbed, arched overlays could represent jewelry, clothing, scarification, or other forms of body decoration. In many West African societies, such features serve to represent beauty, social rank, or ceremonial identity. However, it is impossible to determine whether the sculpture in question depicts a specific historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human form.

The sculpture in question does not represent a particular historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human figure. Possible Ritual Function

Anthropomorphic terracotta vessels from northeastern Nigeria can be considered in the context of religious, social, and ceremonial practices. In various communities of the region, ceramic objects possess a meaning that extends beyond their everyday use as containers. They may be part of healing rituals, protective ceremonies, ancestor worship, or other forms of communication with spiritual powers. The combination of a human figure and the vessel's body opens up the possibility of understanding the object simultaneously as a container and as a pictorial representation of a particular power or personality. The wide-open mouth could have a dual meaning in such a context: as a functional opening and as a symbolic organ of communication. Whether the present piece was actually intended to hold liquids, offerings, or other substances cannot be determined from the photograph. Likewise, it remains unclear whether it was an independently used cult vessel, part of a larger ritual apparatus, or an object with another function. The designation as a ritual vessel should therefore be understood as a culturally and historically grounded, but not definitively established, interpretation.

Art Historical Analysis

From an art historical perspective, the terracotta represents a remarkable example of the fusion of ceramic vessel architecture and figurative sculpture. The composition develops from a closed, voluminous lower body, whose serene, slightly conical form creates a striking contrast to the richly articulated upper section. The sculptural applications generate a complex rhythm of horizontal bands, vertical stripes, and flowing ornaments. Particularly characteristic is the deliberate emphasis on the head, which, through its height, ornamental design, and large mouth opening, becomes the focal point of the entire composition. The raised hand breaks through the largely closed silhouette, lending the figure a pronounced gestural dynamism. The modeling of the body parts does not adhere to a strictly naturalistic anatomy, but rather to an artistic order in which certain features are consciously exaggerated. This formal language is found in various ceramic traditions of northeastern Nigeria, where anthropomorphic representations are frequently characterized by expressive faces, sculptural decorative elements, and complex surface textures. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the smooth sections of the vessel's body and the densely ornamented zones of the upper part. This creates a visual tension between stillness and movement, solid mass and sculptural differentiation. The ceramic technique allows for a direct, additive design, in which individual elements are applied to the base and subsequently structured by incisions or notches. This method is clearly recognizable in the relief-like bands and ornamental overlays. A precise attribution to a specific workshop or individual potter is not possible due to a lack of comparative documentation.

Art Historical Assessment

The exceptional artistic quality of this terracotta vessel, attributed to Cham, lies in its extraordinary combination of a functional basic form, expressive anthropomorphization, and ornamental diversity. The voluminous vessel body forms the stable foundation of a complex figurative composition, whose expressive power is particularly evident in the open mouth, raised hand, and richly articulated head unfold their expressive power. The numerous sculptural details lend the surface a vibrant, rhythmically structured appearance and illustrate the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture. Within the context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, the object possesses a remarkable sculptural presence. It exemplifies an artistic conception in which the boundaries between vessel, human figure, and potential ritual symbol become fluid. Its precise dating, original use, and specific cultural context remain open to interpretation without supplementary archaeological or ethnographic documentation. The work's particular significance lies precisely in this combination of formal autonomy and cultural-historical complexity.

Literature

Marla C. Berns: Art, History, and Gender: Women and Clay in West Africa. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1993.

Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.

The publications mentioned serve as a general art historical and ethnographic framework for classifying West African ceramic and terracotta traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the vessel in question or a definitive attribution to a specific Cham workshop.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ31179

Informant: Amadou Dogo

Sold without TL test.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.

卖家故事

沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克的对非洲艺术的投入并非始于田野或市场,而是在一个更安静、更内在的空间——在父亲的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非为了讲出一个单一的故事;它暗示着多种可能。它邀请审视而非崇敬,并让贾艾尼克在早年就明白,物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部携带时间——断裂与延续以同样的形式共存——并请人像对待文本那样去解读它们。 二十多年多来,贾艾尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都不能完全概括他的实践形态。曾经较为随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从未是一个封闭或历史性的类别。它更像是一组活生生的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史与比较法——提供了一个语法;语言本身则在别处学得。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复的相遇逐步显现,逐步变成关系,并通过信任在多年里一点点建立起来。 马里成为这段经历的重力中心。2002年至2012年间,贾艾尼克在巴马科和塞古居住并工作,经营着Tribalartforum,一家俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抵抗简单的年表化叙述。雕塑与陶器与摄影共处同一房间,马利克·西德比(Malick Sidibé)的作品——70年代昔日马里的青年形象,充满自信与热情——与更古老的仪式形式并列挂着。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是澄清:过去与现在并不彼此抵消,而是相互锐化。 2012年的战争突然结束了这一阶段,正如战争常常所做的那样。但它并未消解这份工作。与阿吉布·卡马特(Aguibou Kamaté)一起,贾艾尼克在洛美重新集结,离许多物件的来源地更近,也离它们继续行走的路线更近。自2018年以来,柏林成为这张地图上的又一个节点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现设在夏洛滕堡皇宫对面,由一支小型专家团队支撑。其重点,尤其聚焦于西非青铜器与陶土器——这类以土与火为塑造材料,又以记忆形式抵御轻易翻译的材料。 贾艾尼克的实践之所以与众不同,不仅在于它的地理范围,还在于其内部张力。田野工作与来源研究并行;商业活动与责任感被视为不可分割。与博物馆及学术机构的合作中,流通被框定为一种伦理过程,而非单纯的掠取。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存起来,而是让它们在世界中保持可读性——在其言语的条件改变之时,仍使它们继续发声。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke 是一家驻柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具以及当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克掌舵,他的工作结合了收藏、经销、来源研究、田野考察与档案文献记录。 据画廊自述,贾艾尼克学习了民族学、艺术史与比较法,在非洲艺术领域从业超过二十五年。他的活动通过在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与而发展起来。他并非将非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为由活生生的社区和不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯的一个特别重要阶段是在马里,约2002年至2012年间在巴马科和塞古居住、工作。在那里他经营Tribalartforum,一家将历史性非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合起来的画廊,包括马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年马里的政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动关闭。 随后,贾艾尼克与阿吉布·卡马特一起继续在洛美、多哥工作,然后在柏林夏洛滕堡宫附近建立画廊。画廊尤为强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与贝宁及伊菲相关作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、道贡(Dogon)艺术、包雷(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件以及约鲁巴材料等。 贾艾尼克公共立场的一个独特之处在于他反复强调来源透明度和赔偿辩论。在若干已发表的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文书、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和赔偿研究人员的沟通等问题。这些陈述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛辩论。 画廊维持着大量线上档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括贝宁与伊菲青铜器、诺克陶土、道贡雕塑、包雷人像、丰(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易史的学者而言,贾艾尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人物更后期的一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后纽约市场的1950年代至1970年代,而贾艾尼克的工作则受现代议题的影响:田野文档、来源研究、赔偿讨论、数字档案以及与西非网络与艺术家直接接触。 本文本基于人工智能信息
使用Google翻译翻译

Cham Terracotta Sculpture – Anthropomorphic Ritual Vessel with Sculpted Figurative Decoration

Origin: Adamawa Region, Nigeria

Cultural Attribution: Cham (Chamba), attributed

Material: Fired clay, modeled, with applied ornaments, incised decoration, and an ochre to reddish-brown surface

Dating: Uncertain

Description

This anthropomorphic terracotta vessel from the Adamawa Region in eastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally complex sculptural design, in which the human figure, vessel body, and ornamental elements merge into a cohesive sculptural unity. The towering object has a voluminous, almost egg-shaped lower body that tapers upwards to a richly modeled human bust. Above the robust upper body, adorned with sculpted details, rises an elongated neck, crowned by a large, expressively sculpted head. Particularly striking is the wide-open, almost circular mouth, deeply incised into the face and possibly also forming a functional opening for the vessel. The nose is strongly emphasized, while the eyes are suggested by small, incised or impressed depressions. The face is framed laterally by sculpted elements that can be interpreted as earrings, sections of hair, or ornamental pendants. The tall, arched headdress or hairstyle is adorned with regularly arranged, relief-like stripes and incised lines. A horizontal, ribbed band marks the transition between the forehead and the headdress. An angled arm rises to the side of the head, its hand with spread fingers clearly visible. The gesture conveys the impression of an invocation, greeting, or ceremonial act, though its original meaning remains unclear. The torso is decorated with numerous sculpted, arched, and band-like elements, their surfaces structured by regular indentations. Some of these forms resemble necklaces, textile appliqués, or stylized body ornaments. The body of the vessel has a relatively smooth, slightly convex surface, bordered by circumferential, three-dimensional bands. Several elongated, ribbed appliqués develop in the lower section, extending to the widened base. The reddish-brown to sand-colored terracotta shows numerous abrasions, small chips, cracks, and irregular discolorations. Material losses are particularly evident on the projecting ornaments. The preserved surface suggests a long history, but does not allow for a definitive statement about the object's actual age or original storage conditions.

Cultural and Geographical Context

The Cham, sometimes discussed in ethnographic literature in the broader context of the Chamba groups, are among the ethnic groups of northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas are located primarily in the Gongola River system and adjacent regions of present-day Adamawa State and southern Gombe State. The region forms a cultural transition zone between the Nigerian highlands, the savannahs of the Benue Basin, and the western foothills of the Cameroon Highlands. Its history is characterized by intensive contact between diverse population groups, including the Cham, Longuda, Waja, Tula, and other communities. Within this cultural landscape, a variety of ceramic traditions developed, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic terracotta figures. Figurative vessels, whose human or animal appearance may be associated with a possible ritual use, are particularly well-known. However, the precise cultural attribution of individual objects is often difficult, as manufacturing techniques, ornamentation, and religious beliefs overlap between neighboring communities. For the present vessel, attribution to the Cham is plausible based on its documented origin and its characteristic combination of anthropomorphic modeling and ceramic vessel form. However, a definitive identification would require additional ethnographic information, comparative objects, or a documented provenance.

Iconography and Symbolism

The iconographic design of the vessel is defined by the combination of a human figure with a voluminous ceramic body. The large, wide-open mouth is particularly striking, lending the face extraordinary expressiveness. In various African pictorial traditions, the depiction can be interpreted as a The open mouth could be associated with speech, song, invocation, or the transmission of spiritual messages. However, in the case of a ceramic vessel, the possibility that the opening served a practical function, such as filling or pouring liquids, must also be considered. The striking hand position with spread fingers could indicate a ceremonial gesture. A depiction of communication or social interaction is also conceivable. Without ethnographic evidence, a concrete interpretation remains speculative. The elaborate head design and numerous sculptural ornamentation suggest a prominent figure whose appearance is characterized by distinctive attributes. The ribbed, arched overlays could represent jewelry, clothing, scarification, or other forms of body decoration. In many West African societies, such features serve to represent beauty, social rank, or ceremonial identity. However, it is impossible to determine whether the sculpture in question depicts a specific historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human form.

The sculpture in question does not represent a particular historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human figure. Possible Ritual Function

Anthropomorphic terracotta vessels from northeastern Nigeria can be considered in the context of religious, social, and ceremonial practices. In various communities of the region, ceramic objects possess a meaning that extends beyond their everyday use as containers. They may be part of healing rituals, protective ceremonies, ancestor worship, or other forms of communication with spiritual powers. The combination of a human figure and the vessel's body opens up the possibility of understanding the object simultaneously as a container and as a pictorial representation of a particular power or personality. The wide-open mouth could have a dual meaning in such a context: as a functional opening and as a symbolic organ of communication. Whether the present piece was actually intended to hold liquids, offerings, or other substances cannot be determined from the photograph. Likewise, it remains unclear whether it was an independently used cult vessel, part of a larger ritual apparatus, or an object with another function. The designation as a ritual vessel should therefore be understood as a culturally and historically grounded, but not definitively established, interpretation.

Art Historical Analysis

From an art historical perspective, the terracotta represents a remarkable example of the fusion of ceramic vessel architecture and figurative sculpture. The composition develops from a closed, voluminous lower body, whose serene, slightly conical form creates a striking contrast to the richly articulated upper section. The sculptural applications generate a complex rhythm of horizontal bands, vertical stripes, and flowing ornaments. Particularly characteristic is the deliberate emphasis on the head, which, through its height, ornamental design, and large mouth opening, becomes the focal point of the entire composition. The raised hand breaks through the largely closed silhouette, lending the figure a pronounced gestural dynamism. The modeling of the body parts does not adhere to a strictly naturalistic anatomy, but rather to an artistic order in which certain features are consciously exaggerated. This formal language is found in various ceramic traditions of northeastern Nigeria, where anthropomorphic representations are frequently characterized by expressive faces, sculptural decorative elements, and complex surface textures. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the smooth sections of the vessel's body and the densely ornamented zones of the upper part. This creates a visual tension between stillness and movement, solid mass and sculptural differentiation. The ceramic technique allows for a direct, additive design, in which individual elements are applied to the base and subsequently structured by incisions or notches. This method is clearly recognizable in the relief-like bands and ornamental overlays. A precise attribution to a specific workshop or individual potter is not possible due to a lack of comparative documentation.

Art Historical Assessment

The exceptional artistic quality of this terracotta vessel, attributed to Cham, lies in its extraordinary combination of a functional basic form, expressive anthropomorphization, and ornamental diversity. The voluminous vessel body forms the stable foundation of a complex figurative composition, whose expressive power is particularly evident in the open mouth, raised hand, and richly articulated head unfold their expressive power. The numerous sculptural details lend the surface a vibrant, rhythmically structured appearance and illustrate the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture. Within the context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, the object possesses a remarkable sculptural presence. It exemplifies an artistic conception in which the boundaries between vessel, human figure, and potential ritual symbol become fluid. Its precise dating, original use, and specific cultural context remain open to interpretation without supplementary archaeological or ethnographic documentation. The work's particular significance lies precisely in this combination of formal autonomy and cultural-historical complexity.

Literature

Marla C. Berns: Art, History, and Gender: Women and Clay in West Africa. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1993.

Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.

The publications mentioned serve as a general art historical and ethnographic framework for classifying West African ceramic and terracotta traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the vessel in question or a definitive attribution to a specific Cham workshop.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ31179

Informant: Amadou Dogo

Sold without TL test.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.

卖家故事

沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克的对非洲艺术的投入并非始于田野或市场,而是在一个更安静、更内在的空间——在父亲的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非为了讲出一个单一的故事;它暗示着多种可能。它邀请审视而非崇敬,并让贾艾尼克在早年就明白,物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部携带时间——断裂与延续以同样的形式共存——并请人像对待文本那样去解读它们。 二十多年多来,贾艾尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都不能完全概括他的实践形态。曾经较为随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从未是一个封闭或历史性的类别。它更像是一组活生生的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史与比较法——提供了一个语法;语言本身则在别处学得。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复的相遇逐步显现,逐步变成关系,并通过信任在多年里一点点建立起来。 马里成为这段经历的重力中心。2002年至2012年间,贾艾尼克在巴马科和塞古居住并工作,经营着Tribalartforum,一家俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抵抗简单的年表化叙述。雕塑与陶器与摄影共处同一房间,马利克·西德比(Malick Sidibé)的作品——70年代昔日马里的青年形象,充满自信与热情——与更古老的仪式形式并列挂着。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是澄清:过去与现在并不彼此抵消,而是相互锐化。 2012年的战争突然结束了这一阶段,正如战争常常所做的那样。但它并未消解这份工作。与阿吉布·卡马特(Aguibou Kamaté)一起,贾艾尼克在洛美重新集结,离许多物件的来源地更近,也离它们继续行走的路线更近。自2018年以来,柏林成为这张地图上的又一个节点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现设在夏洛滕堡皇宫对面,由一支小型专家团队支撑。其重点,尤其聚焦于西非青铜器与陶土器——这类以土与火为塑造材料,又以记忆形式抵御轻易翻译的材料。 贾艾尼克的实践之所以与众不同,不仅在于它的地理范围,还在于其内部张力。田野工作与来源研究并行;商业活动与责任感被视为不可分割。与博物馆及学术机构的合作中,流通被框定为一种伦理过程,而非单纯的掠取。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存起来,而是让它们在世界中保持可读性——在其言语的条件改变之时,仍使它们继续发声。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke 是一家驻柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具以及当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·贾艾尼克掌舵,他的工作结合了收藏、经销、来源研究、田野考察与档案文献记录。 据画廊自述,贾艾尼克学习了民族学、艺术史与比较法,在非洲艺术领域从业超过二十五年。他的活动通过在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与而发展起来。他并非将非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为由活生生的社区和不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯的一个特别重要阶段是在马里,约2002年至2012年间在巴马科和塞古居住、工作。在那里他经营Tribalartforum,一家将历史性非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合起来的画廊,包括马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年马里的政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动关闭。 随后,贾艾尼克与阿吉布·卡马特一起继续在洛美、多哥工作,然后在柏林夏洛滕堡宫附近建立画廊。画廊尤为强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与贝宁及伊菲相关作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、道贡(Dogon)艺术、包雷(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件以及约鲁巴材料等。 贾艾尼克公共立场的一个独特之处在于他反复强调来源透明度和赔偿辩论。在若干已发表的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文书、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和赔偿研究人员的沟通等问题。这些陈述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛辩论。 画廊维持着大量线上档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括贝宁与伊菲青铜器、诺克陶土、道贡雕塑、包雷人像、丰(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易史的学者而言,贾艾尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人物更后期的一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后纽约市场的1950年代至1970年代,而贾艾尼克的工作则受现代议题的影响:田野文档、来源研究、赔偿讨论、数字档案以及与西非网络与艺术家直接接触。 本文本基于人工智能信息
使用Google翻译翻译

详细资料

Ethnic group/ culture
Cham
原产国
尼日利亚
材质
Terracotta
Sold with stand
不是
状态
情况尚佳
艺术品标题
A terraoctta sculpture
高度
53 cm
重量
4,2 kg
真伪
复制品/摹本
德国经验证
6937
已售出的几件物品
99,43%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

类似物品

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​

类别为您准备的

非洲及部落艺术

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​