一个陶土雕塑 - Cham - 尼日利亞 (沒有保留價)

04
天
11
小時
26
分鐘
15
秒
開始競投
€ 1
沒有保留價
Dimitri André
專家
由Dimitri André精選

擁有非洲研究碩士學位及非洲藝術15年工作經驗。

估價  € 280 - € 330
沒有出價記錄

Catawiki買家保障

在您收到物品前,我們會妥善保管您的付款。查看詳情

Trustpilot評分 4.4 | 143856 則評論

在Trustpilot獲得極佳評等。

尼日利亞產的陶土雕塑,歸屬 Cham(Chamba)族,亞達瑪瓦地區,複製品。

AI輔助摘要

賣家描述

Cham Terracotta Sculpture – Anthropomorphic Ritual Vessel with Sculpted Figurative Decoration

Origin: Adamawa Region, Nigeria

Cultural Attribution: Cham (Chamba), attributed

Material: Fired clay, modeled, with applied ornaments, incised decoration, and an ochre to reddish-brown surface

Dating: Uncertain

Description

This anthropomorphic terracotta vessel from the Adamawa Region in eastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally complex sculptural design, in which the human figure, vessel body, and ornamental elements merge into a cohesive sculptural unity. The towering object has a voluminous, almost egg-shaped lower body that tapers upwards to a richly modeled human bust. Above the robust upper body, adorned with sculpted details, rises an elongated neck, crowned by a large, expressively sculpted head. Particularly striking is the wide-open, almost circular mouth, deeply incised into the face and possibly also forming a functional opening for the vessel. The nose is strongly emphasized, while the eyes are suggested by small, incised or impressed depressions. The face is framed laterally by sculpted elements that can be interpreted as earrings, sections of hair, or ornamental pendants. The tall, arched headdress or hairstyle is adorned with regularly arranged, relief-like stripes and incised lines. A horizontal, ribbed band marks the transition between the forehead and the headdress. An angled arm rises to the side of the head, its hand with spread fingers clearly visible. The gesture conveys the impression of an invocation, greeting, or ceremonial act, though its original meaning remains unclear. The torso is decorated with numerous sculpted, arched, and band-like elements, their surfaces structured by regular indentations. Some of these forms resemble necklaces, textile appliqués, or stylized body ornaments. The body of the vessel has a relatively smooth, slightly convex surface, bordered by circumferential, three-dimensional bands. Several elongated, ribbed appliqués develop in the lower section, extending to the widened base. The reddish-brown to sand-colored terracotta shows numerous abrasions, small chips, cracks, and irregular discolorations. Material losses are particularly evident on the projecting ornaments. The preserved surface suggests a long history, but does not allow for a definitive statement about the object's actual age or original storage conditions.

Cultural and Geographical Context

The Cham, sometimes discussed in ethnographic literature in the broader context of the Chamba groups, are among the ethnic groups of northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas are located primarily in the Gongola River system and adjacent regions of present-day Adamawa State and southern Gombe State. The region forms a cultural transition zone between the Nigerian highlands, the savannahs of the Benue Basin, and the western foothills of the Cameroon Highlands. Its history is characterized by intensive contact between diverse population groups, including the Cham, Longuda, Waja, Tula, and other communities. Within this cultural landscape, a variety of ceramic traditions developed, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic terracotta figures. Figurative vessels, whose human or animal appearance may be associated with a possible ritual use, are particularly well-known. However, the precise cultural attribution of individual objects is often difficult, as manufacturing techniques, ornamentation, and religious beliefs overlap between neighboring communities. For the present vessel, attribution to the Cham is plausible based on its documented origin and its characteristic combination of anthropomorphic modeling and ceramic vessel form. However, a definitive identification would require additional ethnographic information, comparative objects, or a documented provenance.

Iconography and Symbolism

The iconographic design of the vessel is defined by the combination of a human figure with a voluminous ceramic body. The large, wide-open mouth is particularly striking, lending the face extraordinary expressiveness. In various African pictorial traditions, the depiction can be interpreted as a The open mouth could be associated with speech, song, invocation, or the transmission of spiritual messages. However, in the case of a ceramic vessel, the possibility that the opening served a practical function, such as filling or pouring liquids, must also be considered. The striking hand position with spread fingers could indicate a ceremonial gesture. A depiction of communication or social interaction is also conceivable. Without ethnographic evidence, a concrete interpretation remains speculative. The elaborate head design and numerous sculptural ornamentation suggest a prominent figure whose appearance is characterized by distinctive attributes. The ribbed, arched overlays could represent jewelry, clothing, scarification, or other forms of body decoration. In many West African societies, such features serve to represent beauty, social rank, or ceremonial identity. However, it is impossible to determine whether the sculpture in question depicts a specific historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human form.

The sculpture in question does not represent a particular historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human figure. Possible Ritual Function

Anthropomorphic terracotta vessels from northeastern Nigeria can be considered in the context of religious, social, and ceremonial practices. In various communities of the region, ceramic objects possess a meaning that extends beyond their everyday use as containers. They may be part of healing rituals, protective ceremonies, ancestor worship, or other forms of communication with spiritual powers. The combination of a human figure and the vessel's body opens up the possibility of understanding the object simultaneously as a container and as a pictorial representation of a particular power or personality. The wide-open mouth could have a dual meaning in such a context: as a functional opening and as a symbolic organ of communication. Whether the present piece was actually intended to hold liquids, offerings, or other substances cannot be determined from the photograph. Likewise, it remains unclear whether it was an independently used cult vessel, part of a larger ritual apparatus, or an object with another function. The designation as a ritual vessel should therefore be understood as a culturally and historically grounded, but not definitively established, interpretation.

Art Historical Analysis

From an art historical perspective, the terracotta represents a remarkable example of the fusion of ceramic vessel architecture and figurative sculpture. The composition develops from a closed, voluminous lower body, whose serene, slightly conical form creates a striking contrast to the richly articulated upper section. The sculptural applications generate a complex rhythm of horizontal bands, vertical stripes, and flowing ornaments. Particularly characteristic is the deliberate emphasis on the head, which, through its height, ornamental design, and large mouth opening, becomes the focal point of the entire composition. The raised hand breaks through the largely closed silhouette, lending the figure a pronounced gestural dynamism. The modeling of the body parts does not adhere to a strictly naturalistic anatomy, but rather to an artistic order in which certain features are consciously exaggerated. This formal language is found in various ceramic traditions of northeastern Nigeria, where anthropomorphic representations are frequently characterized by expressive faces, sculptural decorative elements, and complex surface textures. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the smooth sections of the vessel's body and the densely ornamented zones of the upper part. This creates a visual tension between stillness and movement, solid mass and sculptural differentiation. The ceramic technique allows for a direct, additive design, in which individual elements are applied to the base and subsequently structured by incisions or notches. This method is clearly recognizable in the relief-like bands and ornamental overlays. A precise attribution to a specific workshop or individual potter is not possible due to a lack of comparative documentation.

Art Historical Assessment

The exceptional artistic quality of this terracotta vessel, attributed to Cham, lies in its extraordinary combination of a functional basic form, expressive anthropomorphization, and ornamental diversity. The voluminous vessel body forms the stable foundation of a complex figurative composition, whose expressive power is particularly evident in the open mouth, raised hand, and richly articulated head unfold their expressive power. The numerous sculptural details lend the surface a vibrant, rhythmically structured appearance and illustrate the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture. Within the context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, the object possesses a remarkable sculptural presence. It exemplifies an artistic conception in which the boundaries between vessel, human figure, and potential ritual symbol become fluid. Its precise dating, original use, and specific cultural context remain open to interpretation without supplementary archaeological or ethnographic documentation. The work's particular significance lies precisely in this combination of formal autonomy and cultural-historical complexity.

Literature

Marla C. Berns: Art, History, and Gender: Women and Clay in West Africa. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1993.

Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.

The publications mentioned serve as a general art historical and ethnographic framework for classifying West African ceramic and terracotta traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the vessel in question or a definitive attribution to a specific Cham workshop.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ31179

Informant: Amadou Dogo

Sold without TL test.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.

賣家的故事

沃尔夫冈·雅尼克的对非洲艺术的参与并非在田野调查或市场交易中开始,而是在一个更安静、内在的空间里——在他父亲留下的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非按照单一故事来编排;它暗示着多种可能。它更鼓励审视,而非崇敬,并早早教会雅尼克:物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部包藏时间——以同一种形式承载断裂与连续——并且请人像解读文本一样去读它们。 在二十多年里,雅尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都未能真正捕捉到他实践的形态。那些曾经被随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从来不是一个封闭的、历史性的类别。它反而是一套活着的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史、比较法——提供了一种语法。语言本身则是在别处学到的。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复接触逐步显现,这些接触逐渐发展为关系,并通过信任在多年里逐步建立。 马里成为这一经历的引力中心。2002年至2012年间,雅尼克在巴马科和塞古生活与工作,经营Tribalartforum——一间俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抗拒简单的年代顺序。雕塑与陶器与摄影作品共同占据同一个房间,马利克·西迪贝的作品——70年代马里青年自信而狂放的形象——与更古老的仪式形式并列悬挂。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是使人澄清:过去与现在并非彼此排斥,而是彼此锋利。 2012年的战争突然终结了这一篇章,像战争常有的那样。但它并未消解这项工作。与阿吉博·卡马特一起,雅尼克在洛美重新集结,地点更靠近许多物件的来源地以及它们仍在穿越的路线。自2018年起,柏林成为这张地图上的另一个点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现对着夏洛滕堡宫对面,由一支专业团队支援。画廊特别聚焦西非青铜器与陶土器、材料由土壤与火、以及抗拒轻易翻译的记忆形式所塑成的物件。 雅尼克的实践之所以独特,不仅在于它的地理范围,更在于其内部的张力。现场考察与出处研究并行;商业活动被视为与责任密不可分。画廊与博物馆、学术机构合作,将流通框定为一种道德过程,始终未完结。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存,而是让它们在世界中保持可解读的状态——允许它们继续发声,即使发声的条件在变化。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke是一家位于柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具与当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·雅尼克掌舵,他的工作融合收藏、经销、出处研究、田野工作与档案文献整理。 据画廊自述,雅尼克 studied ethnology、art history 与 comparative law,在非洲艺术领域工作超过二十五年。他的活动在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与中发展起来。他并不把非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为被生活共同体与不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯一个特别重要的阶段在马里,约在2002年至2012年之间,在巴马科与塞古生活与工作,经营Tribalartforum——一个将历史非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合的画廊,其中也包含马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年的马里政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动结束。 后来,与阿吉博·卡马特一起,雅尼克继续在洛美工作,随后在柏林靠近夏洛滕堡宫建立画廊。画廊格外强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与本恩(Benin)及伊夫(Ife)相关的作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、洞贡(Dogon)艺术、鲍勒(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件及约鲁巴(Yoruba)材料。 雅尼克公开立场的一大鲜明特点,是他反复强调出处透明与归还辩论。在多份公开的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文件、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和归还研究者的沟通等问题。这些表述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛讨论。 画廊维护着庞大的在线档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括本安与伊夫青铜器、诺克陶土、洞贡雕塑、鲍勒人像、冯(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像,以及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易历史的学者而言,雅尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人群体的后期一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后1950s–1970s的纽约市场,而雅尼克的工作则受到当代对田野记录、出处研究、归还讨论、数字档案以及直接与西非网络与艺术家互动等关注所塑造。 本文本基于AI信息
由Google翻譯翻譯

Cham Terracotta Sculpture – Anthropomorphic Ritual Vessel with Sculpted Figurative Decoration

Origin: Adamawa Region, Nigeria

Cultural Attribution: Cham (Chamba), attributed

Material: Fired clay, modeled, with applied ornaments, incised decoration, and an ochre to reddish-brown surface

Dating: Uncertain

Description

This anthropomorphic terracotta vessel from the Adamawa Region in eastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally complex sculptural design, in which the human figure, vessel body, and ornamental elements merge into a cohesive sculptural unity. The towering object has a voluminous, almost egg-shaped lower body that tapers upwards to a richly modeled human bust. Above the robust upper body, adorned with sculpted details, rises an elongated neck, crowned by a large, expressively sculpted head. Particularly striking is the wide-open, almost circular mouth, deeply incised into the face and possibly also forming a functional opening for the vessel. The nose is strongly emphasized, while the eyes are suggested by small, incised or impressed depressions. The face is framed laterally by sculpted elements that can be interpreted as earrings, sections of hair, or ornamental pendants. The tall, arched headdress or hairstyle is adorned with regularly arranged, relief-like stripes and incised lines. A horizontal, ribbed band marks the transition between the forehead and the headdress. An angled arm rises to the side of the head, its hand with spread fingers clearly visible. The gesture conveys the impression of an invocation, greeting, or ceremonial act, though its original meaning remains unclear. The torso is decorated with numerous sculpted, arched, and band-like elements, their surfaces structured by regular indentations. Some of these forms resemble necklaces, textile appliqués, or stylized body ornaments. The body of the vessel has a relatively smooth, slightly convex surface, bordered by circumferential, three-dimensional bands. Several elongated, ribbed appliqués develop in the lower section, extending to the widened base. The reddish-brown to sand-colored terracotta shows numerous abrasions, small chips, cracks, and irregular discolorations. Material losses are particularly evident on the projecting ornaments. The preserved surface suggests a long history, but does not allow for a definitive statement about the object's actual age or original storage conditions.

Cultural and Geographical Context

The Cham, sometimes discussed in ethnographic literature in the broader context of the Chamba groups, are among the ethnic groups of northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas are located primarily in the Gongola River system and adjacent regions of present-day Adamawa State and southern Gombe State. The region forms a cultural transition zone between the Nigerian highlands, the savannahs of the Benue Basin, and the western foothills of the Cameroon Highlands. Its history is characterized by intensive contact between diverse population groups, including the Cham, Longuda, Waja, Tula, and other communities. Within this cultural landscape, a variety of ceramic traditions developed, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic terracotta figures. Figurative vessels, whose human or animal appearance may be associated with a possible ritual use, are particularly well-known. However, the precise cultural attribution of individual objects is often difficult, as manufacturing techniques, ornamentation, and religious beliefs overlap between neighboring communities. For the present vessel, attribution to the Cham is plausible based on its documented origin and its characteristic combination of anthropomorphic modeling and ceramic vessel form. However, a definitive identification would require additional ethnographic information, comparative objects, or a documented provenance.

Iconography and Symbolism

The iconographic design of the vessel is defined by the combination of a human figure with a voluminous ceramic body. The large, wide-open mouth is particularly striking, lending the face extraordinary expressiveness. In various African pictorial traditions, the depiction can be interpreted as a The open mouth could be associated with speech, song, invocation, or the transmission of spiritual messages. However, in the case of a ceramic vessel, the possibility that the opening served a practical function, such as filling or pouring liquids, must also be considered. The striking hand position with spread fingers could indicate a ceremonial gesture. A depiction of communication or social interaction is also conceivable. Without ethnographic evidence, a concrete interpretation remains speculative. The elaborate head design and numerous sculptural ornamentation suggest a prominent figure whose appearance is characterized by distinctive attributes. The ribbed, arched overlays could represent jewelry, clothing, scarification, or other forms of body decoration. In many West African societies, such features serve to represent beauty, social rank, or ceremonial identity. However, it is impossible to determine whether the sculpture in question depicts a specific historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human form.

The sculpture in question does not represent a particular historical figure, a spiritual authority, or an idealized human figure. Possible Ritual Function

Anthropomorphic terracotta vessels from northeastern Nigeria can be considered in the context of religious, social, and ceremonial practices. In various communities of the region, ceramic objects possess a meaning that extends beyond their everyday use as containers. They may be part of healing rituals, protective ceremonies, ancestor worship, or other forms of communication with spiritual powers. The combination of a human figure and the vessel's body opens up the possibility of understanding the object simultaneously as a container and as a pictorial representation of a particular power or personality. The wide-open mouth could have a dual meaning in such a context: as a functional opening and as a symbolic organ of communication. Whether the present piece was actually intended to hold liquids, offerings, or other substances cannot be determined from the photograph. Likewise, it remains unclear whether it was an independently used cult vessel, part of a larger ritual apparatus, or an object with another function. The designation as a ritual vessel should therefore be understood as a culturally and historically grounded, but not definitively established, interpretation.

Art Historical Analysis

From an art historical perspective, the terracotta represents a remarkable example of the fusion of ceramic vessel architecture and figurative sculpture. The composition develops from a closed, voluminous lower body, whose serene, slightly conical form creates a striking contrast to the richly articulated upper section. The sculptural applications generate a complex rhythm of horizontal bands, vertical stripes, and flowing ornaments. Particularly characteristic is the deliberate emphasis on the head, which, through its height, ornamental design, and large mouth opening, becomes the focal point of the entire composition. The raised hand breaks through the largely closed silhouette, lending the figure a pronounced gestural dynamism. The modeling of the body parts does not adhere to a strictly naturalistic anatomy, but rather to an artistic order in which certain features are consciously exaggerated. This formal language is found in various ceramic traditions of northeastern Nigeria, where anthropomorphic representations are frequently characterized by expressive faces, sculptural decorative elements, and complex surface textures. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the smooth sections of the vessel's body and the densely ornamented zones of the upper part. This creates a visual tension between stillness and movement, solid mass and sculptural differentiation. The ceramic technique allows for a direct, additive design, in which individual elements are applied to the base and subsequently structured by incisions or notches. This method is clearly recognizable in the relief-like bands and ornamental overlays. A precise attribution to a specific workshop or individual potter is not possible due to a lack of comparative documentation.

Art Historical Assessment

The exceptional artistic quality of this terracotta vessel, attributed to Cham, lies in its extraordinary combination of a functional basic form, expressive anthropomorphization, and ornamental diversity. The voluminous vessel body forms the stable foundation of a complex figurative composition, whose expressive power is particularly evident in the open mouth, raised hand, and richly articulated head unfold their expressive power. The numerous sculptural details lend the surface a vibrant, rhythmically structured appearance and illustrate the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture. Within the context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, the object possesses a remarkable sculptural presence. It exemplifies an artistic conception in which the boundaries between vessel, human figure, and potential ritual symbol become fluid. Its precise dating, original use, and specific cultural context remain open to interpretation without supplementary archaeological or ethnographic documentation. The work's particular significance lies precisely in this combination of formal autonomy and cultural-historical complexity.

Literature

Marla C. Berns: Art, History, and Gender: Women and Clay in West Africa. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1993.

Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.

The publications mentioned serve as a general art historical and ethnographic framework for classifying West African ceramic and terracotta traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the vessel in question or a definitive attribution to a specific Cham workshop.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ31179

Informant: Amadou Dogo

Sold without TL test.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.

賣家的故事

沃尔夫冈·雅尼克的对非洲艺术的参与并非在田野调查或市场交易中开始,而是在一个更安静、内在的空间里——在他父亲留下的文件、书籍与物件之间。关于德国前殖民地的档案并非按照单一故事来编排;它暗示着多种可能。它更鼓励审视,而非崇敬,并早早教会雅尼克:物件从来不是沉默的。它们内部包藏时间——以同一种形式承载断裂与连续——并且请人像解读文本一样去读它们。 在二十多年里,雅尼克一直以收藏家、经销商与中介的身份工作,尽管这些称谓都未能真正捕捉到他实践的形态。那些曾经被随意地归在“部落艺术”范畴下的事物,在他看来从来不是一个封闭的、历史性的类别。它反而是一套活着的传统,不断在当下进行协商。他的学术训练——民族学、艺术史、比较法——提供了一种语法。语言本身则是在别处学到的。在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、多哥和加纳,知识是通过反复接触逐步显现,这些接触逐渐发展为关系,并通过信任在多年里逐步建立。 马里成为这一经历的引力中心。2002年至2012年间,雅尼克在巴马科和塞古生活与工作,经营Tribalartforum——一间俯瞰尼日尔河的画廊。这个空间抗拒简单的年代顺序。雕塑与陶器与摄影作品共同占据同一个房间,马利克·西迪贝的作品——70年代马里青年自信而狂放的形象——与更古老的仪式形式并列悬挂。其效果并非让人怀旧,而是使人澄清:过去与现在并非彼此排斥,而是彼此锋利。 2012年的战争突然终结了这一篇章,像战争常有的那样。但它并未消解这项工作。与阿吉博·卡马特一起,雅尼克在洛美重新集结,地点更靠近许多物件的来源地以及它们仍在穿越的路线。自2018年起,柏林成为这张地图上的另一个点。Wolfgang Jaenicke画廊现对着夏洛滕堡宫对面,由一支专业团队支援。画廊特别聚焦西非青铜器与陶土器、材料由土壤与火、以及抗拒轻易翻译的记忆形式所塑成的物件。 雅尼克的实践之所以独特,不仅在于它的地理范围,更在于其内部的张力。现场考察与出处研究并行;商业活动被视为与责任密不可分。画廊与博物馆、学术机构合作,将流通框定为一种道德过程,始终未完结。目标并非将物件从世界中移除并封存,而是让它们在世界中保持可解读的状态——允许它们继续发声,即使发声的条件在变化。 ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke是一家位于柏林的画廊,专注于西非雕塑、青铜器、陶土器、面具与当代非洲艺术。由沃尔夫冈·雅尼克掌舵,他的工作融合收藏、经销、出处研究、田野工作与档案文献整理。 据画廊自述,雅尼克 studied ethnology、art history 与 comparative law,在非洲艺术领域工作超过二十五年。他的活动在马里、喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、布基纳法索、加纳和多哥等国的长期参与中发展起来。他并不把非洲艺术呈现为一个封闭的历史范畴,而是描述为被生活共同体与不断变化的历史情境共同塑造的持续文化传统。 他职业生涯一个特别重要的阶段在马里,约在2002年至2012年之间,在巴马科与塞古生活与工作,经营Tribalartforum——一个将历史非洲雕塑与当代非洲摄影结合的画廊,其中也包含马利克·西迪贝的作品。2012年的马里政治与军事危机导致这一阶段的活动结束。 后来,与阿吉博·卡马特一起,雅尼克继续在洛美工作,随后在柏林靠近夏洛滕堡宫建立画廊。画廊格外强调西非青铜器、陶土器、与本恩(Benin)及伊夫(Ife)相关的作品、诺克(Nok)雕塑、洞贡(Dogon)艺术、鲍勒(Baule)雕塑、塞努福(Senufo)物件及约鲁巴(Yoruba)材料。 雅尼克公开立场的一大鲜明特点,是他反复强调出处透明与归还辩论。在多份公开的物件记录中,画廊明确讨论出口文件、联合国教科文组织公约、所有权历史以及与学者和归还研究者的沟通等问题。这些表述反映了当代关于非洲文化遗产流通、合法性、收藏史及博物馆收购实践的更广泛讨论。 画廊维护着庞大的在线档案与目录,记录着数百件非洲物件,包括本安与伊夫青铜器、诺克陶土、洞贡雕塑、鲍勒人像、冯(Fon)物件、莫巴(Moba)人像,以及其他西非材料。 对于研究非洲艺术贸易历史的学者而言,雅尼克代表了比约翰·J·克莱曼等人群体的后期一代经销商。克莱曼属于二战后1950s–1970s的纽约市场,而雅尼克的工作则受到当代对田野记录、出处研究、归还讨论、数字档案以及直接与西非网络与艺术家互动等关注所塑造。 本文本基于AI信息
由Google翻譯翻譯

詳細資料

族裔/文化
Cham
原產國
尼日利亞
物料
Terracotta
Sold with stand
不是
狀況
狀況一般
藝術品標題
A terraoctta sculpture
Height
53 cm
重量
4,2 kg
真偽
複製品/摹製品
德國已驗證
6937
已售物品
99,42%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

類似物品

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​

中的精彩好物

非洲與部落藝術

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​