A bronze head - Queen Idia - Benin - Nigeria






Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 123294 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
Bronze head of Queen Idia, from Nigeria, Benin culture, weighing 4.6 kg and standing 50 cm tall in fair condition.
Description from the seller
An bronze head of Queen Idia, Nigeria.
The Bronze Head of Queen Idia, a masterpiece of 16th-century Benin court art, exemplifies the sophisticated metalworking techniques and complex visual language of the Edo people, while simultaneously serving as a powerful political and spiritual symbol. Created using the lost-wax casting method by the royal guild of Igun Eronmwon, the head portrays Queen Idia—the mother of Oba Esigie—adorned with a high coral-bead crown (ukpe-okhue), iron-inlaid eyes, and distinctive facial scarifications, all of which signify her elevated status and sacred authority. The sculpture functioned as a commemorative altar head, placed on ancestral altars in the palace to honor her as the first Iyoba (Queen Mother), a title institutionalized by Esigie in recognition of Idia’s instrumental role in securing his reign and leading military campaigns. As a symbol of matrilineal influence, spiritual intercession, and dynastic legitimacy, the head not only venerates Idia's legacy but also reinforces the divine nature of kingship in Benin cosmology. According to the National Museums Liverpool, “Only royal altars dedicated to previous Obas and previous Iyobas are permitted to have commemorative heads cast in bronze or brass placed on them,” underscoring the head’s exclusivity and ritual significance within royal ancestral veneration (National Museums Liverpool, n.d.).
Bodenstein and von Luschan - two antagonistic viewpoints
Felicity Bodenstein
“In the lecture … Dr Bodenstein traces the journey of the Idia masks from Benin via the art market to Western museums. The aim is to understand how, over the course of the 20th century, the current interpretations of the historical figure Idia in Europe and in Nigeria have developed. To what extent are these congruent and where do they differ?” IDW Online. She further emphasises that the miniaturised ivory and metal portraits of Idia made in the 16th century have become widely dispersed globally—while their original significance in the Benin‑court context was largely lost for decades. IDW Online
Her work also foregrounds the digital project “Digital Benin” which seeks to map artefacts from over 20 countries and to enable co‑constructed knowledge with Nigerian and European scholars.
In a lecture entitled “Where is Idia? A study of dispersal and display” delivered at the Technische Universität Berlin on 5 December 2018, Felicity Bodenstein examines the trajectories of the Idia masks as they travelled from Benin through the art market to Western museum collections. She frames this movement not merely as a circulation of objects but as a complex negotiation of meaning: over the course of the twentieth century, interpretations of the historical figure Idia diverged between Europe and Nigeria, raising questions about the congruence and disparity of these understandings. Her analysis underscores the extent to which the original significance of the miniature ivory and metal portraits of Idia, produced in the sixteenth century for the Benin court, was largely effaced during decades of global dispersal. In this context, Bodenstein draws attention to the “Digital Benin” initiative, a collaborative project designed to map artefacts located in over twenty countries and to facilitate co‑constructed knowledge between Nigerian and European scholars, thereby creating new frameworks for understanding both the objects and their historical narratives.
Felix von Luschan,
in his 1919 monograph Die Altertümer von Benin (Berlin), states that the Benin bronzes are of the highest technical quality, demonstrating exceptional casting skill and artistic sophistication. He emphasizes the precision of lost‑wax casting methods and the nuanced treatment of facial and regalia details, positioning these objects among the most accomplished examples of African metalwork of their period. Luschan’s assessments historically influenced both European collecting practices and early scholarly approaches to Benin art, shaping perceptions of technical and aesthetic achievement that remain foundational in the study of these works.
Photo Felix von Luschan (last photo sequence), Benin queen, Die Altertümer von Benin, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, at the end of the phoesequence together with the exemplare we collected a couple of years ago and the Berlin exemplare, probably the best of all.
In the early twentieth century, Felix von Luschan’s monumental survey Die Altertümer von Benin offered European audiences one of the first systematic encounters with the material culture of the Benin court. Within this encyclopedic work, the ivory masks and pendants—now widely associated with the historical figure of Idia, the Iyoba of Benin—are catalogued primarily according to form, material, and provenance, rather than as portraits of a queen‑mother. Luschan’s lens is typological and descriptive, oriented toward museum documentation, and his attention to these objects foregrounds their circulation into European collections rather than their embedded courtly significance.
Viewed from the perspective of Idia’s representation, Luschan’s approach both illuminates and obscures. It illuminates in that it preserves detailed records of the objects’ physical characteristics and early acquisition histories, enabling later scholars to trace their dispersal across continents. It obscures in that the subtlety of Idia’s symbolic and political role—the power, ritual authority, and cultural resonance she embodied in the sixteenth‑century court—is largely absent from his analysis. In this respect, Luschan’s work exemplifies a stage in which European documentation of Benin art was rigorous yet culturally detached, a moment preceding the more nuanced interpretations that would emerge in late twentieth‑ and early twenty‑first‑century scholarship.
Thus, in tracing the afterlife of Idia’s image, one can read Luschan as providing a foundational archive of form and distribution, while simultaneously highlighting the gaps between early European typological accounts and the living historical, ritual, and gendered significances that scholars like Bodenstein seek to recover and map through initiatives such as Digital Benin.
Seller's Story
An bronze head of Queen Idia, Nigeria.
The Bronze Head of Queen Idia, a masterpiece of 16th-century Benin court art, exemplifies the sophisticated metalworking techniques and complex visual language of the Edo people, while simultaneously serving as a powerful political and spiritual symbol. Created using the lost-wax casting method by the royal guild of Igun Eronmwon, the head portrays Queen Idia—the mother of Oba Esigie—adorned with a high coral-bead crown (ukpe-okhue), iron-inlaid eyes, and distinctive facial scarifications, all of which signify her elevated status and sacred authority. The sculpture functioned as a commemorative altar head, placed on ancestral altars in the palace to honor her as the first Iyoba (Queen Mother), a title institutionalized by Esigie in recognition of Idia’s instrumental role in securing his reign and leading military campaigns. As a symbol of matrilineal influence, spiritual intercession, and dynastic legitimacy, the head not only venerates Idia's legacy but also reinforces the divine nature of kingship in Benin cosmology. According to the National Museums Liverpool, “Only royal altars dedicated to previous Obas and previous Iyobas are permitted to have commemorative heads cast in bronze or brass placed on them,” underscoring the head’s exclusivity and ritual significance within royal ancestral veneration (National Museums Liverpool, n.d.).
Bodenstein and von Luschan - two antagonistic viewpoints
Felicity Bodenstein
“In the lecture … Dr Bodenstein traces the journey of the Idia masks from Benin via the art market to Western museums. The aim is to understand how, over the course of the 20th century, the current interpretations of the historical figure Idia in Europe and in Nigeria have developed. To what extent are these congruent and where do they differ?” IDW Online. She further emphasises that the miniaturised ivory and metal portraits of Idia made in the 16th century have become widely dispersed globally—while their original significance in the Benin‑court context was largely lost for decades. IDW Online
Her work also foregrounds the digital project “Digital Benin” which seeks to map artefacts from over 20 countries and to enable co‑constructed knowledge with Nigerian and European scholars.
In a lecture entitled “Where is Idia? A study of dispersal and display” delivered at the Technische Universität Berlin on 5 December 2018, Felicity Bodenstein examines the trajectories of the Idia masks as they travelled from Benin through the art market to Western museum collections. She frames this movement not merely as a circulation of objects but as a complex negotiation of meaning: over the course of the twentieth century, interpretations of the historical figure Idia diverged between Europe and Nigeria, raising questions about the congruence and disparity of these understandings. Her analysis underscores the extent to which the original significance of the miniature ivory and metal portraits of Idia, produced in the sixteenth century for the Benin court, was largely effaced during decades of global dispersal. In this context, Bodenstein draws attention to the “Digital Benin” initiative, a collaborative project designed to map artefacts located in over twenty countries and to facilitate co‑constructed knowledge between Nigerian and European scholars, thereby creating new frameworks for understanding both the objects and their historical narratives.
Felix von Luschan,
in his 1919 monograph Die Altertümer von Benin (Berlin), states that the Benin bronzes are of the highest technical quality, demonstrating exceptional casting skill and artistic sophistication. He emphasizes the precision of lost‑wax casting methods and the nuanced treatment of facial and regalia details, positioning these objects among the most accomplished examples of African metalwork of their period. Luschan’s assessments historically influenced both European collecting practices and early scholarly approaches to Benin art, shaping perceptions of technical and aesthetic achievement that remain foundational in the study of these works.
Photo Felix von Luschan (last photo sequence), Benin queen, Die Altertümer von Benin, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, at the end of the phoesequence together with the exemplare we collected a couple of years ago and the Berlin exemplare, probably the best of all.
In the early twentieth century, Felix von Luschan’s monumental survey Die Altertümer von Benin offered European audiences one of the first systematic encounters with the material culture of the Benin court. Within this encyclopedic work, the ivory masks and pendants—now widely associated with the historical figure of Idia, the Iyoba of Benin—are catalogued primarily according to form, material, and provenance, rather than as portraits of a queen‑mother. Luschan’s lens is typological and descriptive, oriented toward museum documentation, and his attention to these objects foregrounds their circulation into European collections rather than their embedded courtly significance.
Viewed from the perspective of Idia’s representation, Luschan’s approach both illuminates and obscures. It illuminates in that it preserves detailed records of the objects’ physical characteristics and early acquisition histories, enabling later scholars to trace their dispersal across continents. It obscures in that the subtlety of Idia’s symbolic and political role—the power, ritual authority, and cultural resonance she embodied in the sixteenth‑century court—is largely absent from his analysis. In this respect, Luschan’s work exemplifies a stage in which European documentation of Benin art was rigorous yet culturally detached, a moment preceding the more nuanced interpretations that would emerge in late twentieth‑ and early twenty‑first‑century scholarship.
Thus, in tracing the afterlife of Idia’s image, one can read Luschan as providing a foundational archive of form and distribution, while simultaneously highlighting the gaps between early European typological accounts and the living historical, ritual, and gendered significances that scholars like Bodenstein seek to recover and map through initiatives such as Digital Benin.
Seller's Story
Details
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
