A bronze head - Ife - Nigeria
08
days
19
hours
23
minutes
41
seconds
Starting bid
€ 1
Reserve price not met
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 1,600 - € 1,800
No bids placed
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 139016 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A bronze head, an original Ife sculpture from Nigeria, 18 cm high and weighing 750 g, in fair condition.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
This Ife- Bronze head is approximately 20 cm high, representing a human figure with a remarkable degree of naturalism. Despite its relatively small scale, the face is carefully modelled and displays strongly individualized features: a high rounded forehead, almond-shaped eyes with clearly defined lids, a broad nose, prominent full lips, rounded cheeks, and a softly modelled chin. The particular proportions of the eyes, nose, mouth, and jaw create the impression of a specific physiognomy rather than a generalized or idealized human type.
One of the most characteristic features is the dense pattern of fine vertical lines covering much of the face. Similar striations occur on a number of well-known naturalistic heads from Ife. They have frequently been interpreted as scarification or other forms of facial marking, although their precise significance remains debated. Reddish traces are also visible, particularly around the nose and mouth and within some of the incised lines. Whether these represent remnants of an original surface treatment would require technical analysis.
The top of the head is rounded and comparatively plain. Of particular importance for the question of identity is the absence of a crown, elaborate headdress, diadem, beadwork, or other immediately recognizable insignia of Yoruba kingship. The neck is likewise restrained in its treatment, cylindrical in form and terminating in horizontal bands.
The small size of the head deserves particular attention. At approximately 20 cm, it belongs to the less commonly encountered small-scale examples of naturalistic Ife metal sculpture. Wolfgang Jaenicke, who has collected and examined approximately two dozen life-size Ife heads over the course of his collecting activity, considers heads of this smaller format to be considerably rarer. This observation should be understood as deriving from long-term collecting and market experience rather than as a statistical survey of all surviving Ife sculpture.
It is nevertheless supported to some extent by an important archaeological comparison. The celebrated group discovered at Wunmonije in Ife in 1938 consisted of seventeen copper and brass heads. According to the British Museum, fifteen were life-size, while only two were smaller than life-size. Significantly, the two smaller examples were crowned. The Wunmonije evidence therefore demonstrates both the predominance of life-size heads within this major archaeological group and the fact that small scale in itself does not exclude royal associations.
This makes the present head particularly interesting. It combines three characteristics: an unusual small format, a strongly individualized physiognomy, and an absence of visible royal insignia. It therefore differs not only from the majority of the life-size Wunmonije heads but also from the smaller crowned examples.
The naturalistic heads of Ife, generally dated between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries, have frequently been associated with the Ooni, the ruler of Ife. Earlier scholarship in particular tended to interpret such works as royal portraits, sometimes regarding physiognomic differences between individual heads as evidence for representations of successive rulers.
There are strong historical and cultural reasons for connecting important Ife heads with kingship. Ile-Ife occupied an exceptional position as a religious and political centre, while the Ooni stood at the centre of its sacred kingship. The human head itself also has profound significance in Yoruba thought. The concept of ori extends beyond the physical head and is connected with individual identity, destiny, and spiritual agency. As Babatunde Lawal has demonstrated, the prominence of the head in Yoruba art therefore cannot be understood simply in terms of physical likeness.
Nevertheless, the general identification of naturalistic Ife heads as portraits of Ooni is no longer secure. For most isolated heads there is no archaeological or historical evidence allowing them to be associated with a named ruler. Even the identity of the individuals represented by the Wunmonije heads remains a matter of interpretation. Their importance and high status are evident, but naturalism alone cannot establish whether every individual represented was an Ooni.
The concept of “portraiture” therefore requires some qualification. The extraordinary naturalism of Ife sculpture encourages a modern viewer to interpret these heads as portraits. Individual works differ considerably in the forms of their faces, eyes, noses, lips, cheeks, and jaws, suggesting that physiognomic distinction was meaningful. Yet naturalism does not necessarily imply portraiture in the modern European sense of recording a recognizable likeness of a particular historical individual.
More recent scholarship has consequently examined the relationship between physiognomic individuality, political identity, ritual function, and social status. Suzanne Preston Blier has been particularly important in reconsidering the heads within the political culture of early Ife. In Art and Risk in Ancient Yoruba she discusses the “Portrait Heads” within the broader context of politics, representation, and regalia and separately examines the political significance of royal headgear. This approach emphasizes that physiognomy and regalia constitute different, though interconnected, systems of representation.
From this perspective, an “individual portrait” and a “representation of a ruler” need not be mutually exclusive. A sculpture could conceivably preserve recognizable characteristics of a particular person while simultaneously expressing political office, dynastic identity, or ritual status.
In the case of the present head, however, the absence of visible royal insignia deserves particular consideration. If royal identity was intended to be explicitly communicated, crowns, elaborate headgear, beads, and other insignia provided effective visual means of doing so. Their absence cannot simply be ignored. Combined with the unusually small scale and strongly individualized facial features, it raises the serious possibility that the person represented was not an Ooni but another specific individual of social, political, or ritual importance.
At the same time, the absence of a cast bronze crown cannot prove that the individual was not an Ooni. Separate crowns, beads, textiles, or other materials may originally have accompanied certain heads and subsequently disappeared. Archaeological context and evidence for attachments are therefore essential to any definitive interpretation.
The most cautious description of the present object would consequently be a small-scale, naturalistic, and highly individualized bronze head in the Ife tradition rather than an unequivocal “Portrait of an Ooni.” Neither its physiognomy, scale, nor lack of royal insignia can independently establish the sitter's identity. Taken together, however, these characteristics provide substantial reason to reconsider the automatic association of naturalistic Ife heads with the Ooni and to take more seriously the possibility of individual portraiture.
The rarity of the small format also raises a broader research question. If further study were to demonstrate that small-scale Ife heads differ systematically from life-size examples in their regalia, physiognomy, technical construction, or archaeological contexts, they might represent a distinct functional category within Ife portrait sculpture. At present this remains a hypothesis rather than an established conclusion.
References (selected)
Blier, Suzanne Preston. Art and Risk in Ancient Yoruba: Ife History, Power, and Identity, c. 1300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Especially “A Gallery of Portrait Heads: Political Art in Early Ife” and the discussion of royal headgear.
Drewal, Henry John, John Pemberton III, and Rowland Abiodun. Yoruba: Nine Centuries of African Art and Thought. New York: The Center for African Art / Harry N. Abrams, 1989.
Lawal, Babatunde. “Orí: The Significance of the Head in Yoruba Sculpture.” Journal of Anthropological Research 41, no. 1 (1985): 91–103.
Willett, Frank. Ife in the History of West African Sculpture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
British Museum, London. Wunmonije Head, Collection Database, CRS.17. Particularly relevant for the composition of the 1938 Wunmonije discovery and the distinction between the fifteen life-size and two smaller crowned heads.
Jaenicke, Wolfgang. Personal observations based on long-term collecting and examination of Ife heads. Jaenicke has collected approximately two dozen life-size examples and notes the comparative rarity of small-format heads. This observation should be understood as a collector's empirical assessment rather than a published statistical survey.
Some of the information is generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history.
The price is without the price for the TL analysis but can be done within four weeks for 350,- Euro
Invt. No. MAZ21778
The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
This Ife- Bronze head is approximately 20 cm high, representing a human figure with a remarkable degree of naturalism. Despite its relatively small scale, the face is carefully modelled and displays strongly individualized features: a high rounded forehead, almond-shaped eyes with clearly defined lids, a broad nose, prominent full lips, rounded cheeks, and a softly modelled chin. The particular proportions of the eyes, nose, mouth, and jaw create the impression of a specific physiognomy rather than a generalized or idealized human type.
One of the most characteristic features is the dense pattern of fine vertical lines covering much of the face. Similar striations occur on a number of well-known naturalistic heads from Ife. They have frequently been interpreted as scarification or other forms of facial marking, although their precise significance remains debated. Reddish traces are also visible, particularly around the nose and mouth and within some of the incised lines. Whether these represent remnants of an original surface treatment would require technical analysis.
The top of the head is rounded and comparatively plain. Of particular importance for the question of identity is the absence of a crown, elaborate headdress, diadem, beadwork, or other immediately recognizable insignia of Yoruba kingship. The neck is likewise restrained in its treatment, cylindrical in form and terminating in horizontal bands.
The small size of the head deserves particular attention. At approximately 20 cm, it belongs to the less commonly encountered small-scale examples of naturalistic Ife metal sculpture. Wolfgang Jaenicke, who has collected and examined approximately two dozen life-size Ife heads over the course of his collecting activity, considers heads of this smaller format to be considerably rarer. This observation should be understood as deriving from long-term collecting and market experience rather than as a statistical survey of all surviving Ife sculpture.
It is nevertheless supported to some extent by an important archaeological comparison. The celebrated group discovered at Wunmonije in Ife in 1938 consisted of seventeen copper and brass heads. According to the British Museum, fifteen were life-size, while only two were smaller than life-size. Significantly, the two smaller examples were crowned. The Wunmonije evidence therefore demonstrates both the predominance of life-size heads within this major archaeological group and the fact that small scale in itself does not exclude royal associations.
This makes the present head particularly interesting. It combines three characteristics: an unusual small format, a strongly individualized physiognomy, and an absence of visible royal insignia. It therefore differs not only from the majority of the life-size Wunmonije heads but also from the smaller crowned examples.
The naturalistic heads of Ife, generally dated between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries, have frequently been associated with the Ooni, the ruler of Ife. Earlier scholarship in particular tended to interpret such works as royal portraits, sometimes regarding physiognomic differences between individual heads as evidence for representations of successive rulers.
There are strong historical and cultural reasons for connecting important Ife heads with kingship. Ile-Ife occupied an exceptional position as a religious and political centre, while the Ooni stood at the centre of its sacred kingship. The human head itself also has profound significance in Yoruba thought. The concept of ori extends beyond the physical head and is connected with individual identity, destiny, and spiritual agency. As Babatunde Lawal has demonstrated, the prominence of the head in Yoruba art therefore cannot be understood simply in terms of physical likeness.
Nevertheless, the general identification of naturalistic Ife heads as portraits of Ooni is no longer secure. For most isolated heads there is no archaeological or historical evidence allowing them to be associated with a named ruler. Even the identity of the individuals represented by the Wunmonije heads remains a matter of interpretation. Their importance and high status are evident, but naturalism alone cannot establish whether every individual represented was an Ooni.
The concept of “portraiture” therefore requires some qualification. The extraordinary naturalism of Ife sculpture encourages a modern viewer to interpret these heads as portraits. Individual works differ considerably in the forms of their faces, eyes, noses, lips, cheeks, and jaws, suggesting that physiognomic distinction was meaningful. Yet naturalism does not necessarily imply portraiture in the modern European sense of recording a recognizable likeness of a particular historical individual.
More recent scholarship has consequently examined the relationship between physiognomic individuality, political identity, ritual function, and social status. Suzanne Preston Blier has been particularly important in reconsidering the heads within the political culture of early Ife. In Art and Risk in Ancient Yoruba she discusses the “Portrait Heads” within the broader context of politics, representation, and regalia and separately examines the political significance of royal headgear. This approach emphasizes that physiognomy and regalia constitute different, though interconnected, systems of representation.
From this perspective, an “individual portrait” and a “representation of a ruler” need not be mutually exclusive. A sculpture could conceivably preserve recognizable characteristics of a particular person while simultaneously expressing political office, dynastic identity, or ritual status.
In the case of the present head, however, the absence of visible royal insignia deserves particular consideration. If royal identity was intended to be explicitly communicated, crowns, elaborate headgear, beads, and other insignia provided effective visual means of doing so. Their absence cannot simply be ignored. Combined with the unusually small scale and strongly individualized facial features, it raises the serious possibility that the person represented was not an Ooni but another specific individual of social, political, or ritual importance.
At the same time, the absence of a cast bronze crown cannot prove that the individual was not an Ooni. Separate crowns, beads, textiles, or other materials may originally have accompanied certain heads and subsequently disappeared. Archaeological context and evidence for attachments are therefore essential to any definitive interpretation.
The most cautious description of the present object would consequently be a small-scale, naturalistic, and highly individualized bronze head in the Ife tradition rather than an unequivocal “Portrait of an Ooni.” Neither its physiognomy, scale, nor lack of royal insignia can independently establish the sitter's identity. Taken together, however, these characteristics provide substantial reason to reconsider the automatic association of naturalistic Ife heads with the Ooni and to take more seriously the possibility of individual portraiture.
The rarity of the small format also raises a broader research question. If further study were to demonstrate that small-scale Ife heads differ systematically from life-size examples in their regalia, physiognomy, technical construction, or archaeological contexts, they might represent a distinct functional category within Ife portrait sculpture. At present this remains a hypothesis rather than an established conclusion.
References (selected)
Blier, Suzanne Preston. Art and Risk in Ancient Yoruba: Ife History, Power, and Identity, c. 1300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Especially “A Gallery of Portrait Heads: Political Art in Early Ife” and the discussion of royal headgear.
Drewal, Henry John, John Pemberton III, and Rowland Abiodun. Yoruba: Nine Centuries of African Art and Thought. New York: The Center for African Art / Harry N. Abrams, 1989.
Lawal, Babatunde. “Orí: The Significance of the Head in Yoruba Sculpture.” Journal of Anthropological Research 41, no. 1 (1985): 91–103.
Willett, Frank. Ife in the History of West African Sculpture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
British Museum, London. Wunmonije Head, Collection Database, CRS.17. Particularly relevant for the composition of the 1938 Wunmonije discovery and the distinction between the fifteen life-size and two smaller crowned heads.
Jaenicke, Wolfgang. Personal observations based on long-term collecting and examination of Ife heads. Jaenicke has collected approximately two dozen life-size examples and notes the comparative rarity of small-format heads. This observation should be understood as a collector's empirical assessment rather than a published statistical survey.
Some of the information is generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history.
The price is without the price for the TL analysis but can be done within four weeks for 350,- Euro
Invt. No. MAZ21778
The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Ife
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Bronze
Sold with stand
No
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A bronze head
Height
18 cm
Weight
750 g
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
