A stone sculpture - Dogon - Mali (No reserve price)
08
days
01
hour
40
minutes
07
seconds
Current bid
€ 1
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Julien Gauthier
A decade of experience in historical arms, armour, and African art.
Estimate € 450 - € 550
 | €1 |
|---|
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 142824 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
Stone sculpture in Dogon style from Mali, Bandiagara region, depicting a mounted rider; height 34 cm, weight 3.6 kg, in fair condition.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Dogon Stone Equestrian Figure, Bandiagara Region, Mali
Dogon, Bandiagara region, Mali
Stone
This unusual stone sculpture represents a mounted male figure and translates one of the most significant themes of Dogon and wider Western Sudanic imagery—the horse and rider—into a compact, strongly architectural composition. The sculpture is organized around the vertical body of the rider and the rectangular opening formed beneath the horse, while an elongated base visually unites animal and human figure.
The rider dominates the composition. His disproportionately large head rises from a long cylindrical neck and is modeled with strongly projecting facial features. Heavy arched brows frame narrow eyes, while the broad nose, projecting lips and pronounced chin create a powerful profile. The treatment is highly sculptural rather than naturalistic: the face consists of a succession of projecting horizontal volumes that contrast with the elongated verticality of the neck and torso.
The rider sits erect upon the animal, his body reduced to a narrow column. His arms descend toward the horse's neck and appear closely integrated into the central mass of the composition. This rigid, frontal bearing gives him an appearance of authority rather than movement. The sculptor has consequently emphasized the status of the rider rather than attempting to represent an active equestrian scene.
The horse is treated with comparable economy. Its long neck descends almost vertically toward the base, while the body forms a horizontal bridge between the forequarters and hindquarters. The resulting rectangular negative space beneath the animal is one of the most important formal features of the sculpture. Horse, rider and base become a single architectural structure composed of alternating solids and voids.
The stone has a warm ochre to light brown coloration with darker areas concentrated in recesses and across the upper surfaces. Its softly rounded edges and irregular surface lend the sculpture an archaeological character. These visual characteristics alone, however, cannot provide a secure indication of age.
Regional characteristics
The attribution to the Bandiagara region is particularly significant. The Bandiagara Escarpment and its surrounding plateau constitute the historical heartland of many Dogon communities and have produced an exceptionally varied sculptural tradition encompassing standing and kneeling figures, ancestral images, architectural elements, ritual vessels and equestrian representations.
Horse-and-rider imagery occupies a distinctive position within Dogon art. Horses were historically prestigious animals throughout the Western Sudan and were closely associated with wealth, political authority and military power. The Metropolitan Museum of Art notes that the equestrian archetype occurs widely across the region and was associated with persons possessing exceptional political, military, economic or spiritual authority.
Within Dogon traditions, equestrian figures have frequently been interpreted as representations of the hogon, the religious and political authority of a community. A historical account from 1907 documented an equestrian wooden sculpture belonging to a hogon, while other field evidence records an equestrian sculpture used on an ancestral altar.
The horse also acquired cosmological associations. In interpretations of Dogon mythology recorded during the twentieth century, equestrian imagery was connected with Nommo and with accounts concerning the primordial ancestors. A Dogon initiation vessel in the Metropolitan Museum, for example, bears an equestrian figure identified in that specific ritual context with the hogon and relates the horse to the mythical descent of the primordial ancestors.
Such interpretations should nevertheless be applied cautiously to an individual sculpture. The Metropolitan Museum's catalogue of the Lester Wunderman collection explicitly observes that comparable freestanding Dogon horsemen generally lack adequate field documentation and that there is no compelling evidence for identifying every example with one particular historical or mythical personality. The horse-and-rider motif was widespread throughout the Western Sudan and also occurs in the artistic traditions of neighboring populations.
The material of the present sculpture makes it particularly intriguing. Most widely published Dogon equestrian sculptures are in wood or metal, and equestrian imagery also appears on ritual vessels and other objects. A stone example therefore deserves special attention. Without archaeological documentation, however, neither its precise ritual function nor its chronology should be inferred solely from material and surface appearance.
Formally, the work shares the characteristic Dogon preference for reducing bodies to strongly articulated geometric masses. The oversized head of the rider, abbreviated torso and highly simplified horse subordinate anatomical realism to clarity and monumentality. Despite its compact proportions, the sculpture communicates an emphatic hierarchy: the horse provides the structural foundation while the upright rider becomes the visual and symbolic summit.
The image may consequently be understood within the broader Western Sudanic language of equestrian authority. Whether the rider specifically represents a hogon, an ancestor, a legendary leader or another powerful personage cannot be determined without its original field context. What can be stated more securely is that the horse-and-rider theme carried strong associations with prestige and exceptional status in Dogon and neighboring artistic traditions.
Selected Literature
Laude, Jean. African Art of the Dogon: The Myths of the Cliff Dwellers. New York, 1973.
Griaule, Marcel. Masques dogons. Paris, Institut d’Ethnologie, 1938.
Ezra, Kate. Art of the Dogon: Selections from the Lester Wunderman Collection. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1988. Particularly relevant for Dogon equestrian sculpture and for the cautious interpretation of the horse-and-rider motif.
De Grunne, Bernard. Ancient Sculpture of the Inland Niger Delta and Its Influence on Dogon Art. In comparative studies of Dogon and Middle Niger sculptural traditions.
Leloup, Hélène. Dogon. Paris: Somogy, 2011. Important comparative reference for the regional stylistic diversity of Dogon sculpture.
Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.
Inv. No. MAZ30191
Informant: Yoro.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Dogon Stone Equestrian Figure, Bandiagara Region, Mali
Dogon, Bandiagara region, Mali
Stone
This unusual stone sculpture represents a mounted male figure and translates one of the most significant themes of Dogon and wider Western Sudanic imagery—the horse and rider—into a compact, strongly architectural composition. The sculpture is organized around the vertical body of the rider and the rectangular opening formed beneath the horse, while an elongated base visually unites animal and human figure.
The rider dominates the composition. His disproportionately large head rises from a long cylindrical neck and is modeled with strongly projecting facial features. Heavy arched brows frame narrow eyes, while the broad nose, projecting lips and pronounced chin create a powerful profile. The treatment is highly sculptural rather than naturalistic: the face consists of a succession of projecting horizontal volumes that contrast with the elongated verticality of the neck and torso.
The rider sits erect upon the animal, his body reduced to a narrow column. His arms descend toward the horse's neck and appear closely integrated into the central mass of the composition. This rigid, frontal bearing gives him an appearance of authority rather than movement. The sculptor has consequently emphasized the status of the rider rather than attempting to represent an active equestrian scene.
The horse is treated with comparable economy. Its long neck descends almost vertically toward the base, while the body forms a horizontal bridge between the forequarters and hindquarters. The resulting rectangular negative space beneath the animal is one of the most important formal features of the sculpture. Horse, rider and base become a single architectural structure composed of alternating solids and voids.
The stone has a warm ochre to light brown coloration with darker areas concentrated in recesses and across the upper surfaces. Its softly rounded edges and irregular surface lend the sculpture an archaeological character. These visual characteristics alone, however, cannot provide a secure indication of age.
Regional characteristics
The attribution to the Bandiagara region is particularly significant. The Bandiagara Escarpment and its surrounding plateau constitute the historical heartland of many Dogon communities and have produced an exceptionally varied sculptural tradition encompassing standing and kneeling figures, ancestral images, architectural elements, ritual vessels and equestrian representations.
Horse-and-rider imagery occupies a distinctive position within Dogon art. Horses were historically prestigious animals throughout the Western Sudan and were closely associated with wealth, political authority and military power. The Metropolitan Museum of Art notes that the equestrian archetype occurs widely across the region and was associated with persons possessing exceptional political, military, economic or spiritual authority.
Within Dogon traditions, equestrian figures have frequently been interpreted as representations of the hogon, the religious and political authority of a community. A historical account from 1907 documented an equestrian wooden sculpture belonging to a hogon, while other field evidence records an equestrian sculpture used on an ancestral altar.
The horse also acquired cosmological associations. In interpretations of Dogon mythology recorded during the twentieth century, equestrian imagery was connected with Nommo and with accounts concerning the primordial ancestors. A Dogon initiation vessel in the Metropolitan Museum, for example, bears an equestrian figure identified in that specific ritual context with the hogon and relates the horse to the mythical descent of the primordial ancestors.
Such interpretations should nevertheless be applied cautiously to an individual sculpture. The Metropolitan Museum's catalogue of the Lester Wunderman collection explicitly observes that comparable freestanding Dogon horsemen generally lack adequate field documentation and that there is no compelling evidence for identifying every example with one particular historical or mythical personality. The horse-and-rider motif was widespread throughout the Western Sudan and also occurs in the artistic traditions of neighboring populations.
The material of the present sculpture makes it particularly intriguing. Most widely published Dogon equestrian sculptures are in wood or metal, and equestrian imagery also appears on ritual vessels and other objects. A stone example therefore deserves special attention. Without archaeological documentation, however, neither its precise ritual function nor its chronology should be inferred solely from material and surface appearance.
Formally, the work shares the characteristic Dogon preference for reducing bodies to strongly articulated geometric masses. The oversized head of the rider, abbreviated torso and highly simplified horse subordinate anatomical realism to clarity and monumentality. Despite its compact proportions, the sculpture communicates an emphatic hierarchy: the horse provides the structural foundation while the upright rider becomes the visual and symbolic summit.
The image may consequently be understood within the broader Western Sudanic language of equestrian authority. Whether the rider specifically represents a hogon, an ancestor, a legendary leader or another powerful personage cannot be determined without its original field context. What can be stated more securely is that the horse-and-rider theme carried strong associations with prestige and exceptional status in Dogon and neighboring artistic traditions.
Selected Literature
Laude, Jean. African Art of the Dogon: The Myths of the Cliff Dwellers. New York, 1973.
Griaule, Marcel. Masques dogons. Paris, Institut d’Ethnologie, 1938.
Ezra, Kate. Art of the Dogon: Selections from the Lester Wunderman Collection. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1988. Particularly relevant for Dogon equestrian sculpture and for the cautious interpretation of the horse-and-rider motif.
De Grunne, Bernard. Ancient Sculpture of the Inland Niger Delta and Its Influence on Dogon Art. In comparative studies of Dogon and Middle Niger sculptural traditions.
Leloup, Hélène. Dogon. Paris: Somogy, 2011. Important comparative reference for the regional stylistic diversity of Dogon sculpture.
Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.
Inv. No. MAZ30191
Informant: Yoro.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Dogon
Country of Origin
Mali
Material
Stone
Sold with stand
No
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A stone sculpture
Height
34 cm
Weight
3.6 kg
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
