A bronze sculpture - Fon - Benin (No reserve price)
05
days
01
hour
15
minutes
32
seconds
Current bid
€ 2
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Julien Gauthier
A decade of experience in historical arms, armour, and African art.
Estimate € 150 - € 200
 | €2 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €1 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 142947 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A bronze sculpture, a Fon Asen figure from the Cotonou region in Benin, 12 cm high, 300 g, sold with stand.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Fon Bronze Asen Figure, Cotonou Region, Benin
Fon, Cotonou region, southern Benin
Cast copper alloy
Asen tradition, incl stand.
This expressive copper-alloy figure belongs to the broader Fon tradition of asen, commemorative metal sculptures associated with remembrance of the dead and communication between living family members and their ancestors. Asen were highly individualized objects: their figurative imagery could refer to the identity, social position, occupation, personal history or attributes of the person commemorated..
The figure represents a seated person wearing a long garment that expands dramatically toward the lower body. The sculpture is dominated by this broad, almost triangular mass, from which the head, arms and lower legs emerge. Rather than constructing the body anatomically beneath the clothing, the caster has treated the garment as the principal sculptural volume.
The head is comparatively small but carefully articulated. A close-fitting cap covers the skull, its surface divided by incised lines. The face has large projecting almond-shaped eyes, a straight nose and prominently modeled lips. The ears project laterally, increasing the silhouette of the head. The elongated neck provides a transition between the relatively compact head and the expansive garment.
Both arms are animated. One extends outward and upward, terminating in a broad hand that appears to be held in a demonstrative or offering gesture. The opposite arm bends sharply at the elbow, with the hand directed toward the torso. This asymmetry gives the sculpture an unusually lively quality. Rather than presenting a static frontal image, the figure appears to be engaged in an action whose original significance may have been recognizable to those familiar with the individual or narrative commemorated.
The seated position is equally important. The legs project beneath the garment and terminate in broad feet or sandals, each modeled with raised details. Seating, clothing and gesture could all carry information concerning rank, profession or personal identity within an asen tableau. Without the remainder of the original ensemble or accompanying oral information, however, the specific meaning of these details cannot be reconstructed securely.
The metal surface ranges from muted brown to greenish-grey, with areas of green copper corrosion and warmer tones visible on projecting elements. The relatively thin walls and open side of the body demonstrate the technical economy of the casting. The sculptor has created considerable physical presence while keeping the principal body volume hollow.
Regional characteristics
The Cotonou attribution places the figure within the southern Beninese environment of Fon artistic traditions. The historically most important centers for asen production were associated particularly with Abomey and, later, Ouidah, although the tradition extended more broadly through southern Benin. Asen were installed in family or royal shrine contexts and functioned as points through which descendants could commemorate and address deceased individuals.
An asen in its complete form was generally considerably more complex than an isolated human figure. Typically it consisted of a metal staff supporting a platform or tableau populated by figures, animals, objects and symbolic motifs. These elements could operate almost as a visual biography of the deceased. The National Museum of African Art describes such imagery as comparable to a visual obituary, while emphasizing that many of its meanings depended on personal names, proverbs and family knowledge.
The present sculpture therefore appears most plausibly to have formed part of a larger asen composition rather than having been conceived necessarily as an independent statuette. Its pronounced gestures become especially meaningful in this context: the figure may originally have interacted visually with another person, animal or symbolic object positioned nearby.
Metalworking techniques varied considerably within the asen tradition. Forged and cut iron played a major role, especially in the distinctive workshops of Ouidah, whereas copper alloys could also be employed, particularly for prestigious or technically elaborate works. Royal asen from Abomey demonstrate sophisticated combinations of cast and worked copper alloys produced by specialized metalworking families.
The treatment of the present figure—with its hollow body, broad garment, projecting limbs and individualized costume—demonstrates the particular possibilities offered by casting. The garment creates a large uninterrupted plane, while the thin arms establish a completely different linear rhythm around it. This contrast between mass and line is one of the work's strongest formal characteristics.
Particularly noteworthy is the apparent individuality of the figure. Fon asen imagery was not simply generic ancestor representation. The assemblage could encode information about a particular deceased person through dress, gestures, attributes, animals, tools and proverbial references. Consequently, details that today appear primarily decorative may originally have carried quite precise meanings.
It would nevertheless be speculative to identify the person represented here as a ruler, priest, ancestor of a particular lineage or Vodun practitioner solely from the photograph. The safest interpretation is that the sculpture belongs to the figurative vocabulary of the Fon asen tradition and probably participated in a larger commemorative ensemble whose complete narrative has not survived with the isolated figure.
Selected Literature
Bay, Edna G. Asen: Iron Altars of the Fon People of Benin. Atlanta: Emory University Museum of Art and Archaeology, 1985. A foundational study devoted specifically to the structure, symbolism and social function of Fon asen.
Bay, Edna G. Asen, Ancestors, and Vodun: Tracing Change in African Art. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008. Particularly important for the history of asen, ancestor commemoration, royal patronage, metalworking and the changing meanings of asen imagery.
Blier, Suzanne Preston. Asen: mémoires de fer forgé. Art vodun du Danhomè dans les collections du musée Barbier-Mueller. Geneva: Musée Barbier-Mueller, 2018. Extensive comparative material on Fon asen and their figurative tableaux.
Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.
Inv. No. MAZ30638
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Fon Bronze Asen Figure, Cotonou Region, Benin
Fon, Cotonou region, southern Benin
Cast copper alloy
Asen tradition, incl stand.
This expressive copper-alloy figure belongs to the broader Fon tradition of asen, commemorative metal sculptures associated with remembrance of the dead and communication between living family members and their ancestors. Asen were highly individualized objects: their figurative imagery could refer to the identity, social position, occupation, personal history or attributes of the person commemorated..
The figure represents a seated person wearing a long garment that expands dramatically toward the lower body. The sculpture is dominated by this broad, almost triangular mass, from which the head, arms and lower legs emerge. Rather than constructing the body anatomically beneath the clothing, the caster has treated the garment as the principal sculptural volume.
The head is comparatively small but carefully articulated. A close-fitting cap covers the skull, its surface divided by incised lines. The face has large projecting almond-shaped eyes, a straight nose and prominently modeled lips. The ears project laterally, increasing the silhouette of the head. The elongated neck provides a transition between the relatively compact head and the expansive garment.
Both arms are animated. One extends outward and upward, terminating in a broad hand that appears to be held in a demonstrative or offering gesture. The opposite arm bends sharply at the elbow, with the hand directed toward the torso. This asymmetry gives the sculpture an unusually lively quality. Rather than presenting a static frontal image, the figure appears to be engaged in an action whose original significance may have been recognizable to those familiar with the individual or narrative commemorated.
The seated position is equally important. The legs project beneath the garment and terminate in broad feet or sandals, each modeled with raised details. Seating, clothing and gesture could all carry information concerning rank, profession or personal identity within an asen tableau. Without the remainder of the original ensemble or accompanying oral information, however, the specific meaning of these details cannot be reconstructed securely.
The metal surface ranges from muted brown to greenish-grey, with areas of green copper corrosion and warmer tones visible on projecting elements. The relatively thin walls and open side of the body demonstrate the technical economy of the casting. The sculptor has created considerable physical presence while keeping the principal body volume hollow.
Regional characteristics
The Cotonou attribution places the figure within the southern Beninese environment of Fon artistic traditions. The historically most important centers for asen production were associated particularly with Abomey and, later, Ouidah, although the tradition extended more broadly through southern Benin. Asen were installed in family or royal shrine contexts and functioned as points through which descendants could commemorate and address deceased individuals.
An asen in its complete form was generally considerably more complex than an isolated human figure. Typically it consisted of a metal staff supporting a platform or tableau populated by figures, animals, objects and symbolic motifs. These elements could operate almost as a visual biography of the deceased. The National Museum of African Art describes such imagery as comparable to a visual obituary, while emphasizing that many of its meanings depended on personal names, proverbs and family knowledge.
The present sculpture therefore appears most plausibly to have formed part of a larger asen composition rather than having been conceived necessarily as an independent statuette. Its pronounced gestures become especially meaningful in this context: the figure may originally have interacted visually with another person, animal or symbolic object positioned nearby.
Metalworking techniques varied considerably within the asen tradition. Forged and cut iron played a major role, especially in the distinctive workshops of Ouidah, whereas copper alloys could also be employed, particularly for prestigious or technically elaborate works. Royal asen from Abomey demonstrate sophisticated combinations of cast and worked copper alloys produced by specialized metalworking families.
The treatment of the present figure—with its hollow body, broad garment, projecting limbs and individualized costume—demonstrates the particular possibilities offered by casting. The garment creates a large uninterrupted plane, while the thin arms establish a completely different linear rhythm around it. This contrast between mass and line is one of the work's strongest formal characteristics.
Particularly noteworthy is the apparent individuality of the figure. Fon asen imagery was not simply generic ancestor representation. The assemblage could encode information about a particular deceased person through dress, gestures, attributes, animals, tools and proverbial references. Consequently, details that today appear primarily decorative may originally have carried quite precise meanings.
It would nevertheless be speculative to identify the person represented here as a ruler, priest, ancestor of a particular lineage or Vodun practitioner solely from the photograph. The safest interpretation is that the sculpture belongs to the figurative vocabulary of the Fon asen tradition and probably participated in a larger commemorative ensemble whose complete narrative has not survived with the isolated figure.
Selected Literature
Bay, Edna G. Asen: Iron Altars of the Fon People of Benin. Atlanta: Emory University Museum of Art and Archaeology, 1985. A foundational study devoted specifically to the structure, symbolism and social function of Fon asen.
Bay, Edna G. Asen, Ancestors, and Vodun: Tracing Change in African Art. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008. Particularly important for the history of asen, ancestor commemoration, royal patronage, metalworking and the changing meanings of asen imagery.
Blier, Suzanne Preston. Asen: mémoires de fer forgé. Art vodun du Danhomè dans les collections du musée Barbier-Mueller. Geneva: Musée Barbier-Mueller, 2018. Extensive comparative material on Fon asen and their figurative tableaux.
Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.
Inv. No. MAZ30638
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Fon
Country of Origin
Benin
Material
Bronze
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A bronze sculpture
Height
12 cm
Weight
300 g
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
