A wooden sculpture - Prampram - Ghana

04
days
10
hours
58
minutes
32
seconds
Current bid
€ 50
Reserve price not met
Dimitri André
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André

Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.

Estimate  € 2,400 - € 2,700
FR
€50
FR
€13
PL
€10

Catawiki Buyer Protection

Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details

Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews

Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.

A wooden sculpture from Prampram, Ghana, 125 cm tall and weighing 3.2 kg, made of wood with a stand, in fair condition and authentic/original.

AI-assisted summary

Description from the seller

These objects referred to as “Prampram sculptures” can only with difficulty be defined as a clearly bounded, homogeneous group within the artistic landscape of this ethnic group in southern Ghana. The term itself points to the coastal region around Prampram, whose cultural context is shaped largely by Ga-Adangbe-speaking communities. Within this context, ritual wooden figures are far less canonized than in some of the better-known sculptural traditions of West Africa; rather, they emerge situationally, tied to specific ritual practices, shrines, or initiation settings. This embeddedness helps explain the striking formal openness evident in the figure under discussion. Incl stand.

The described sculpture, whose form is directly derived from a naturally grown, branching piece of wood, points to a central principle found in many West African artistic traditions, often discussed in terms of “material agency”. Here, the material is not entirely subordinated to artistic intention; instead, its given form is understood as already an intrinsic force. Within animistic worldviews—present in varying forms in southern Ghana—nature itself is endowed with vitality. Wood is not merely raw material but already animated, permeated by spiritual potentials that are revealed or accentuated through minimal intervention.

In this respect, a structural affinity can be observed with practices among other West African groups such as the Lobi, whose figures are likewise often developed from naturally pre-shaped wood and whose seemingly “raw” appearance expresses a direct relationship between spirit beings, material, and social space. However, this should not be mistaken for a direct stylistic or cultural continuity; rather, it reflects a shared logic in the engagement with natural form and spirituality.

The situational perception of such sculptures - in the light of the bush, at the threshold between day and night - is not merely atmospheric but constitutive of their effect. Rituals staged in transitional zones, both temporal and spatial, mark liminal states in which the boundary between visible and invisible worlds becomes permeable. The sculpture functions less as an autonomous artwork than as a node within a network of relations: between humans, ancestors, local spirits, and the surrounding landscape. Its initial visual indistinguishability from its environment intensifies this role. Only upon closer inspection does difference emerge - a moment of recognition that is itself part of the ritual experience.

A comparison with Alberto Giacometti offers a revealing aesthetic perspective. His figure “L'Homme qui marche I” embodies an existential condensation: movement as reduction, as linear progression through space, coupled with radical abstraction and isolation. The Prampram figure, by contrast, appears to propose a counter-model: not linear movement but an oscillating, dance-like dynamic that suggests not directionality but embeddedness. Whereas Giacometti’s figure articulates the modern individual as an isolated subject in an empty space, the African sculpture presents itself as part of a dense web of relations - neither isolated nor reduced, but branching and interconnected.

The use of a naturally grown branch further reinforces this impression. Its bifurcations may be read as visual metaphors for multiple connections: between realms, between states of being, between individual and collective. The apparent “wildness” is not a sign of formlessness but follows a distinct logic - one oriented less toward symmetry and proportion than toward presence and efficacy.

Ultimately, such sculptures are better understood not as static objects but as processes: manifestations of a worldview in which nature, spirit, and human practice are inseparably intertwined. Their aesthetic quality does not unfold in isolation, as it might in a museum setting, but rather through the interplay of place, time, ritual, and perception.

Partly encrusted sacrifucation patina , incl. stand.

References:

Dogbe, B.K. (1977). "The human form as a central theme in art." Image (Journal of the College of Art), Kumasi.Jaenicke, W. (2017). "Neue Prampram Figuren entdeckt." [YouTube video]. Retrieved from https://wolfgang-jaenicke.comPrampram - Ghana. (2025). Barnebys. Retrieved from https://www.barnebys.com/auctions/lot/prampram-ghana-vNrWAsb-619055287.

CAB41117

Withdrawal only!

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

These objects referred to as “Prampram sculptures” can only with difficulty be defined as a clearly bounded, homogeneous group within the artistic landscape of this ethnic group in southern Ghana. The term itself points to the coastal region around Prampram, whose cultural context is shaped largely by Ga-Adangbe-speaking communities. Within this context, ritual wooden figures are far less canonized than in some of the better-known sculptural traditions of West Africa; rather, they emerge situationally, tied to specific ritual practices, shrines, or initiation settings. This embeddedness helps explain the striking formal openness evident in the figure under discussion. Incl stand.

The described sculpture, whose form is directly derived from a naturally grown, branching piece of wood, points to a central principle found in many West African artistic traditions, often discussed in terms of “material agency”. Here, the material is not entirely subordinated to artistic intention; instead, its given form is understood as already an intrinsic force. Within animistic worldviews—present in varying forms in southern Ghana—nature itself is endowed with vitality. Wood is not merely raw material but already animated, permeated by spiritual potentials that are revealed or accentuated through minimal intervention.

In this respect, a structural affinity can be observed with practices among other West African groups such as the Lobi, whose figures are likewise often developed from naturally pre-shaped wood and whose seemingly “raw” appearance expresses a direct relationship between spirit beings, material, and social space. However, this should not be mistaken for a direct stylistic or cultural continuity; rather, it reflects a shared logic in the engagement with natural form and spirituality.

The situational perception of such sculptures - in the light of the bush, at the threshold between day and night - is not merely atmospheric but constitutive of their effect. Rituals staged in transitional zones, both temporal and spatial, mark liminal states in which the boundary between visible and invisible worlds becomes permeable. The sculpture functions less as an autonomous artwork than as a node within a network of relations: between humans, ancestors, local spirits, and the surrounding landscape. Its initial visual indistinguishability from its environment intensifies this role. Only upon closer inspection does difference emerge - a moment of recognition that is itself part of the ritual experience.

A comparison with Alberto Giacometti offers a revealing aesthetic perspective. His figure “L'Homme qui marche I” embodies an existential condensation: movement as reduction, as linear progression through space, coupled with radical abstraction and isolation. The Prampram figure, by contrast, appears to propose a counter-model: not linear movement but an oscillating, dance-like dynamic that suggests not directionality but embeddedness. Whereas Giacometti’s figure articulates the modern individual as an isolated subject in an empty space, the African sculpture presents itself as part of a dense web of relations - neither isolated nor reduced, but branching and interconnected.

The use of a naturally grown branch further reinforces this impression. Its bifurcations may be read as visual metaphors for multiple connections: between realms, between states of being, between individual and collective. The apparent “wildness” is not a sign of formlessness but follows a distinct logic - one oriented less toward symmetry and proportion than toward presence and efficacy.

Ultimately, such sculptures are better understood not as static objects but as processes: manifestations of a worldview in which nature, spirit, and human practice are inseparably intertwined. Their aesthetic quality does not unfold in isolation, as it might in a museum setting, but rather through the interplay of place, time, ritual, and perception.

Partly encrusted sacrifucation patina , incl. stand.

References:

Dogbe, B.K. (1977). "The human form as a central theme in art." Image (Journal of the College of Art), Kumasi.Jaenicke, W. (2017). "Neue Prampram Figuren entdeckt." [YouTube video]. Retrieved from https://wolfgang-jaenicke.comPrampram - Ghana. (2025). Barnebys. Retrieved from https://www.barnebys.com/auctions/lot/prampram-ghana-vNrWAsb-619055287.

CAB41117

Withdrawal only!

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

Details

Ethnic group/ culture
Prampram
Country of Origin
Ghana
Material
Wood
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A wooden sculpture
Height
125 cm
Weight
3.2 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
GermanyVerified
6937
Objects sold
99.42%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

Similar objects

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​

For you in

African & Tribal Art

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​