A wooden sculpture - Prampram - Ghana
05
days
06
hours
02
minutes
47
seconds
Current bid
€ 135
Reserve price not met
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 900 - € 1,000
 | €135 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €125 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
Title of artwork: A wooden sculpture; Country of Origin: Ghana; Ethnic group/culture: Prampram; Provenance: Prampram Region, Greater Accra, Ghana; Material: Wood; Height: 98 cm; Weight: 3 kg; Sold with stand: Yes; Condition: Fair; Authenticity: Original/official.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Pair of Figures from Prampram – Two Anthropomorphic Wooden Sculptures
Origin: Prampram, Greater Accra Region, Southern Ghana
Cultural Context: Prampram, within the cultural context of the Ga-Adangme (Dangme) people
Material: Wood, carved, black and reddish-brown paint, surfaces worn in places
Dating: Uncertain
Provenance: Prampram Region, Ghana, according to traditional provenance information
Description
This ensemble, consisting of two slender, anthropomorphic wooden figures, is characterized by a consistently abstract formal language and remarkable compositional unity. Both sculptures follow an almost identical design principle: An oval, largely featureless head rises above an elongated, narrow body, clearly separated from the torso by a thin, cylindrical neck. The shoulders are softly rounded and flow into long, slender arms that hang parallel to the body. The legs appear as strongly elongated, downward-tapering appendages, their pointed ends further emphasizing the pronounced verticality of the composition. The left figure has a dark, almost black surface with bluish reflections in places and numerous light signs of wear. The right figure, in contrast, is characterized by an intense reddish-brown paint finish, whose partially glossy surface also reveals clear signs of use and irregularities. Both heads largely forgo anatomical details. Only faint vertical ridges and depressions structure their surfaces and offer a minimal suggestion of human physiognomy. The bodies are sculpted without pronounced chest or abdominal modeling. In the lower region, both figures exhibit small sculpted protrusions that could possibly be interpreted as male sexual characteristics. However, their identification remains uncertain due to the simplified rendering. The figures stand on separate modern display pedestals. Their almost mirror-image posture and the contrasting surface colors create a dynamic interplay between formal harmony and individual differentiation.
Art Historical Analysis
The coastal region around Prampram in present-day southern Ghana belongs to the historical settlement area of the Dangme people, who, together with the Ga, form a significant cultural and linguistic group within southeastern Ghana. The artistic traditions of this region developed within the interplay of local religious beliefs, familial and social organizational structures, and historical exchange relationships with neighboring populations. Besides figurative wood carvings, ritual objects, shrine furnishings, and items associated with protective beliefs, spiritual powers, and the veneration of supernatural beings are particularly well-known. The figures presented here differ markedly from naturalistic forms of representation. Their aesthetic effect is based on a significant reduction of anatomical details in favor of a clear, vertically oriented silhouette. This formal language can be compared with various anthropomorphic sculpture traditions of southern Ghana and neighboring Togo, although a direct stylistic or functional equivalence should not be inferred. The strongly elongated limbs, slender necks, and largely undifferentiated faces, in particular, point to a deliberate concentration of the human form on a few basic formal elements. The attribution to the Prampram region should be understood as a traditional geographical reference. A more precise classification within a specific local workshop tradition or a documented ritual object type is not possible based on the photograph.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic peculiarity of the pair of figures lies in their pronounced formal parallelism and the simultaneous juxtaposition of two different surface colors. Black and red form a strong visual contrast that emphasizes the figures' connection without negating their individual appearance. In various West African religious and artistic traditions, colors can possess symbolic meanings and, for example, refer to specific spiritual powers, social categories, or ritual states. However, a direct transfer of such meanings to the sculptures in question would not be justified without a documented cultural context. It is conceivable that the different coloring was intended to make a complementary relationship between the two figures visible. It could also have served to distinguish between two people or spiritual beings. The paired arrangement opens up further possibilities. In numerous West African societies, concepts of duality, kinship, partnership, and social complementarity hold particular significance. The ensemble could therefore embody a symbolic community of two figures whose relationship is more important than their individual anatomical features. However, whether they actually represent an originally related pair cannot be deduced solely from stylistic similarity. The largely featureless heads also warrant special attention. Their closed, oval shape deprives the figures of a distinct personal identity and lends them a transpersonal appearance. This reduction could point to the representation of general human or spiritual principles, but remains an art historical interpretation.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
In the religious life of Ga Dangme societies, traditional deities, local guardian spirits, ancestor worship, and the relationship between the visible and invisible worlds have historically played a significant role. Certain material objects can serve in this context as components of shrines, as symbols of spiritual presence, or as aids to ritual acts. For the two wooden figures in question, such a use is possible, but not proven. Their slender, elongated design and the lack of a base on the original figures could indicate that they were once embedded in another material, attached to a structure, or placed within a ritual ensemble. The tapered legs would, in principle, allow for such a use. Whether the figures were originally presented as a pair or only later combined into an ensemble remains unclear. Likewise, no specific cultic treatment can be deduced from the visible surface changes. The abrasions and paint loss could have resulted from prolonged handling, storage, or natural aging processes. The interpretation as ancestral figures, protective figures, or ritual representatives should therefore be understood as a possibility, not as a confirmed function.
Art Historical Assessment
The particular artistic quality of this pair of figures lies in the consistent reduction of the human body to an almost symbolic form. The elongated legs, slender arms, and heads clearly set off from the torso create an exceptionally stretched silhouette, the effect of which is further enhanced by the absence of ornamental details. The two sculptures appear less as individual portraits than as concentrated sculptural expressions of human presence. Their artistic strength lies in the balanced relationship between rounded and linear elements: the oval heads and softly modeled shoulders stand in striking contrast to the strictly vertical limbs. The different treatment of the surfaces is particularly impressive. The dark figure has a restrained, almost monochromatic appearance, while the red sculpture, through its intense color, unfolds a stronger visual presence. Together they form a composition in which repetition and variation become essential design elements. Subject to their cultural attribution, the ensemble can be appreciated as a remarkable example of abstract anthropomorphic wooden sculpture from the coastal region of southern Ghana. Its art historical significance lies primarily in its distinctive formal language and the striking combination of sculptural simplicity, color contrast, and potential symbolic duality.
Literature
For further scholarly contextualization, ethnographic and art historical studies on the Ga Dangme societies, their religious traditions, and the material culture of southern Ghana should be consulted. A verified literature reference directly related to this type of figure is not currently available.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31810
Informant: Tagué
Height: 98 cm / 98 cm
Weight: 3 kg / 3,1 kg (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Pair of Figures from Prampram – Two Anthropomorphic Wooden Sculptures
Origin: Prampram, Greater Accra Region, Southern Ghana
Cultural Context: Prampram, within the cultural context of the Ga-Adangme (Dangme) people
Material: Wood, carved, black and reddish-brown paint, surfaces worn in places
Dating: Uncertain
Provenance: Prampram Region, Ghana, according to traditional provenance information
Description
This ensemble, consisting of two slender, anthropomorphic wooden figures, is characterized by a consistently abstract formal language and remarkable compositional unity. Both sculptures follow an almost identical design principle: An oval, largely featureless head rises above an elongated, narrow body, clearly separated from the torso by a thin, cylindrical neck. The shoulders are softly rounded and flow into long, slender arms that hang parallel to the body. The legs appear as strongly elongated, downward-tapering appendages, their pointed ends further emphasizing the pronounced verticality of the composition. The left figure has a dark, almost black surface with bluish reflections in places and numerous light signs of wear. The right figure, in contrast, is characterized by an intense reddish-brown paint finish, whose partially glossy surface also reveals clear signs of use and irregularities. Both heads largely forgo anatomical details. Only faint vertical ridges and depressions structure their surfaces and offer a minimal suggestion of human physiognomy. The bodies are sculpted without pronounced chest or abdominal modeling. In the lower region, both figures exhibit small sculpted protrusions that could possibly be interpreted as male sexual characteristics. However, their identification remains uncertain due to the simplified rendering. The figures stand on separate modern display pedestals. Their almost mirror-image posture and the contrasting surface colors create a dynamic interplay between formal harmony and individual differentiation.
Art Historical Analysis
The coastal region around Prampram in present-day southern Ghana belongs to the historical settlement area of the Dangme people, who, together with the Ga, form a significant cultural and linguistic group within southeastern Ghana. The artistic traditions of this region developed within the interplay of local religious beliefs, familial and social organizational structures, and historical exchange relationships with neighboring populations. Besides figurative wood carvings, ritual objects, shrine furnishings, and items associated with protective beliefs, spiritual powers, and the veneration of supernatural beings are particularly well-known. The figures presented here differ markedly from naturalistic forms of representation. Their aesthetic effect is based on a significant reduction of anatomical details in favor of a clear, vertically oriented silhouette. This formal language can be compared with various anthropomorphic sculpture traditions of southern Ghana and neighboring Togo, although a direct stylistic or functional equivalence should not be inferred. The strongly elongated limbs, slender necks, and largely undifferentiated faces, in particular, point to a deliberate concentration of the human form on a few basic formal elements. The attribution to the Prampram region should be understood as a traditional geographical reference. A more precise classification within a specific local workshop tradition or a documented ritual object type is not possible based on the photograph.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic peculiarity of the pair of figures lies in their pronounced formal parallelism and the simultaneous juxtaposition of two different surface colors. Black and red form a strong visual contrast that emphasizes the figures' connection without negating their individual appearance. In various West African religious and artistic traditions, colors can possess symbolic meanings and, for example, refer to specific spiritual powers, social categories, or ritual states. However, a direct transfer of such meanings to the sculptures in question would not be justified without a documented cultural context. It is conceivable that the different coloring was intended to make a complementary relationship between the two figures visible. It could also have served to distinguish between two people or spiritual beings. The paired arrangement opens up further possibilities. In numerous West African societies, concepts of duality, kinship, partnership, and social complementarity hold particular significance. The ensemble could therefore embody a symbolic community of two figures whose relationship is more important than their individual anatomical features. However, whether they actually represent an originally related pair cannot be deduced solely from stylistic similarity. The largely featureless heads also warrant special attention. Their closed, oval shape deprives the figures of a distinct personal identity and lends them a transpersonal appearance. This reduction could point to the representation of general human or spiritual principles, but remains an art historical interpretation.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
In the religious life of Ga Dangme societies, traditional deities, local guardian spirits, ancestor worship, and the relationship between the visible and invisible worlds have historically played a significant role. Certain material objects can serve in this context as components of shrines, as symbols of spiritual presence, or as aids to ritual acts. For the two wooden figures in question, such a use is possible, but not proven. Their slender, elongated design and the lack of a base on the original figures could indicate that they were once embedded in another material, attached to a structure, or placed within a ritual ensemble. The tapered legs would, in principle, allow for such a use. Whether the figures were originally presented as a pair or only later combined into an ensemble remains unclear. Likewise, no specific cultic treatment can be deduced from the visible surface changes. The abrasions and paint loss could have resulted from prolonged handling, storage, or natural aging processes. The interpretation as ancestral figures, protective figures, or ritual representatives should therefore be understood as a possibility, not as a confirmed function.
Art Historical Assessment
The particular artistic quality of this pair of figures lies in the consistent reduction of the human body to an almost symbolic form. The elongated legs, slender arms, and heads clearly set off from the torso create an exceptionally stretched silhouette, the effect of which is further enhanced by the absence of ornamental details. The two sculptures appear less as individual portraits than as concentrated sculptural expressions of human presence. Their artistic strength lies in the balanced relationship between rounded and linear elements: the oval heads and softly modeled shoulders stand in striking contrast to the strictly vertical limbs. The different treatment of the surfaces is particularly impressive. The dark figure has a restrained, almost monochromatic appearance, while the red sculpture, through its intense color, unfolds a stronger visual presence. Together they form a composition in which repetition and variation become essential design elements. Subject to their cultural attribution, the ensemble can be appreciated as a remarkable example of abstract anthropomorphic wooden sculpture from the coastal region of southern Ghana. Its art historical significance lies primarily in its distinctive formal language and the striking combination of sculptural simplicity, color contrast, and potential symbolic duality.
Literature
For further scholarly contextualization, ethnographic and art historical studies on the Ga Dangme societies, their religious traditions, and the material culture of southern Ghana should be consulted. A verified literature reference directly related to this type of figure is not currently available.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31810
Informant: Tagué
Height: 98 cm / 98 cm
Weight: 3 kg / 3,1 kg (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Prampram
Country of Origin
Ghana
Material
Wood
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A wooden sculpture
Height
98 cm
Weight
6.1 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
