A iron sculpture - Mumuye - Nigeria (No reserve price)
04
days
20
hours
36
minutes
41
seconds
Current bid
€ 1
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 330
 | €1 |
|---|
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
Iron sculpture by the Mumuye from Taraba Region, Nigeria; forged iron with a reddish-brown patina, on a stand, 67 cm high, 800 g, in fair condition, authenticity: Original/official.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Iron Sculpture by Mumuye – Abstract Iron Sculpture with Curved Silhouette
Origin: Taraba Region, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Mumuye, attributed
Material: Iron, forged, with a reddish-brown oxidation patina, incl stand.
Dating: Uncertain
Description
This iron sculpture from the Taraba region of northeastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally minimalist yet dynamic formal language. Its slender, vertically oriented form develops from a long, almost straight iron shaft, which transitions in the upper section into a complex sequence of curved and hook-shaped elements. The object possesses a distinctly linear silhouette, the effect of which arises primarily from the interplay between straight, curved, and pointed forms. The lower shaft is crafted from a narrow iron rod, the irregular surface of which suggests hand-forged workmanship. At its lower end is a small ring-shaped eyelet, which may have originally served for fastening or suspension. The current black display base is a modern addition. In the upper third, the shaft initially develops into a gently curving line extending to the left, which transitions into a small, hook-like projection. Above this, a second, more pronounced bend follows, turning sharply to the right. A short, tapered extension protrudes laterally from this area. The upper main form then describes a wide, almost semicircular arc, the end of which extends horizontally to the right and tapers to a narrow point. This large, crescent-shaped curve forms the visual focal point of the entire composition. The surface is covered with a uniform, reddish-brown oxidation layer of varying intensity in places. Minor irregularities, slight thickening of the material, and the not entirely symmetrical rendering of the contours underscore the hand-forged character. The figure achieves its unique effect through the deliberate limitation to a single, continuous axis of movement, which dissolves in the upper section into a series of rhythmically interrelated curves.
Cultural and Geographical Context
The Mumuye are an ethnic group in northeastern Nigeria, particularly in present-day Taraba State. Their historical settlement areas extend across the landscapes south of the Benue River and the adjacent savannah and hill country. The region is characterized by extraordinary cultural diversity, with the Mumuye, Chamba, Jukun, Wurkun, and other communities interacting over long periods. The material culture of these groups includes not only wooden sculptures but also metal tools, weapons, jewelry, and objects with potential ceremonial significance. The Mumuye's figurative wood carvings are particularly well-known, featuring anthropomorphic sculptures characterized by elongated bodies, abstracted limbs, and a pronounced rhythmic structure. These works were used in various social and religious contexts, including protective beliefs, healing practices, and connections to spiritual forces. Ironworking held both practical and symbolic significance in many societies of the Benue region. Blacksmiths possessed specialized technical knowledge that enabled the transformation of iron through fire and mechanical processing. However, the social standing of blacksmiths and religious beliefs about the material varied considerably between communities. The present iron sculpture has been culturally attributed to the Mumuye people. Whether its form actually corresponds to a specific Mumuye tradition or originated within a broader regional context cannot be definitively determined without documented comparative objects.
Formal Language and Possible Symbolism
The object's unusual shape opens up various possibilities for iconographic interpretation. The large upper curve is reminiscent of a bent neck, a sickle-shaped head, or an abstract animal form. The two smaller, lower curves could be interpreted as further anatomical allusions. The pointed projections, in particular, lend the form a certain resemblance to stylized beaks, horns, or other animal features. However, a definitive identification as a bird, snake, or other living being would be speculative. It could also be a symbolically designed iron object whose form does not explicitly intend a representational image. In various West African meta-cultures All traditions feature highly abstracted figures and symbols whose meaning only becomes clear from their original ritual or social context. The flowing lines could suggest notions of movement, vitality, or transformation. However, such interpretations should not be considered definitive cultural statements. The designation as a sculpture initially describes the object's current aesthetic perception, while its original purpose may have been more functional or ceremonial.
Possible Ritual Function
Forged iron objects could be part of protective rituals, ceremonial acts, or religious institutions in various societies of northeastern Nigeria. In certain regional traditions, metal objects were associated with spiritual powers, while others served as symbols of rank, implements, or symbolic attributes. Due to its slender form and the small eyelet at the bottom, the present form may originally have been mounted, placed on a surface, or integrated into a larger object arrangement. Its use as a finial, emblem, or component of ritual equipment seems plausible. Its resemblance to a functional hook or staff device should also be considered. The sweeping upper curve and the two lateral extensions may have served a practical purpose in addition to their symbolic function. Without information on the original context of discovery or acquisition, possible signs of use, and comparable ethnographic pieces, it is impossible to distinguish between these possibilities. Therefore, a concrete use in ancestor worship, initiations, or in connection with healing rituals has not been proven.
Art Historical Analysis
From an art historical perspective, the object bears a remarkable resemblance to an abstract, linear conception of sculpture. Unlike sculpture developed from closed volumes, its spatial effect arises almost exclusively from the movement of a slender iron form in space. The long vertical shaft forms a calm, stabilizing axis, while the upper section develops a series of increasingly sweeping curves. This composition creates a dynamic transition from static rectilinearity to dynamic movement. The large upper curve appears almost to float and lends the otherwise strictly vertical form a pronounced horizontal extension. The smaller hooks and points in the central area mediate between these two directions. The significance of the surrounding void is particularly noteworthy. The curved iron sections enclose open areas that become essential components of the overall sculptural effect. The viewer thus perceives not only the forged material but also the spaces it creates. From today's perspective, this aesthetic quality is reminiscent of principles in modern abstract metal sculpture. However, such a formal parallel should not be equated with a historical influence or a shared artistic intention. The traditional ironworking of the Benue region developed its own technical, social, and design prerequisites. The mastery of wrought iron is particularly evident here in the controlled creation of tight bends, the gradual alteration of the material's cross-section, and the precisely pointed ends. The irregular oxidation surface reinforces the sculpture's material character and forms a captivating contrast to the elegance of its contours.
Art Historical Assessment
The exceptional quality of this iron sculpture attributed to Mumuye lies in its extraordinary formal concentration. With just a few forged lines, a complex, rhythmically dynamic form emerges, its expressiveness arising from the interplay of material, contour, and negative space. The large, crescent-like curve lends the object a distinctive silhouette, while the smaller hook-like forms create a subtle inner tension. As a testament to a regional tradition of ironworking, the sculpture illustrates the creative possibilities of a material that could be used for both practical and symbolic purposes. Its contemporary aesthetic impact is undeniable, yet its original function, precise cultural context, and dating remain unclear without further documentation. It is precisely this combination of meticulous craftsmanship, radical abstraction, and potential symbolic meaning that makes the object a remarkable example of West African metalwork.
Literature
Frank Herreman (ed.): Mumuye Sculpture: Nigeria. The African Museum, Berg en Dal, 1997.
Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.
The publications mentioned serve to provide a general art historical context for Mumuye art and African metalworking traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the iron object in question or a definitive determination of its original function.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31209
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Iron Sculpture by Mumuye – Abstract Iron Sculpture with Curved Silhouette
Origin: Taraba Region, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Mumuye, attributed
Material: Iron, forged, with a reddish-brown oxidation patina, incl stand.
Dating: Uncertain
Description
This iron sculpture from the Taraba region of northeastern Nigeria is characterized by an exceptionally minimalist yet dynamic formal language. Its slender, vertically oriented form develops from a long, almost straight iron shaft, which transitions in the upper section into a complex sequence of curved and hook-shaped elements. The object possesses a distinctly linear silhouette, the effect of which arises primarily from the interplay between straight, curved, and pointed forms. The lower shaft is crafted from a narrow iron rod, the irregular surface of which suggests hand-forged workmanship. At its lower end is a small ring-shaped eyelet, which may have originally served for fastening or suspension. The current black display base is a modern addition. In the upper third, the shaft initially develops into a gently curving line extending to the left, which transitions into a small, hook-like projection. Above this, a second, more pronounced bend follows, turning sharply to the right. A short, tapered extension protrudes laterally from this area. The upper main form then describes a wide, almost semicircular arc, the end of which extends horizontally to the right and tapers to a narrow point. This large, crescent-shaped curve forms the visual focal point of the entire composition. The surface is covered with a uniform, reddish-brown oxidation layer of varying intensity in places. Minor irregularities, slight thickening of the material, and the not entirely symmetrical rendering of the contours underscore the hand-forged character. The figure achieves its unique effect through the deliberate limitation to a single, continuous axis of movement, which dissolves in the upper section into a series of rhythmically interrelated curves.
Cultural and Geographical Context
The Mumuye are an ethnic group in northeastern Nigeria, particularly in present-day Taraba State. Their historical settlement areas extend across the landscapes south of the Benue River and the adjacent savannah and hill country. The region is characterized by extraordinary cultural diversity, with the Mumuye, Chamba, Jukun, Wurkun, and other communities interacting over long periods. The material culture of these groups includes not only wooden sculptures but also metal tools, weapons, jewelry, and objects with potential ceremonial significance. The Mumuye's figurative wood carvings are particularly well-known, featuring anthropomorphic sculptures characterized by elongated bodies, abstracted limbs, and a pronounced rhythmic structure. These works were used in various social and religious contexts, including protective beliefs, healing practices, and connections to spiritual forces. Ironworking held both practical and symbolic significance in many societies of the Benue region. Blacksmiths possessed specialized technical knowledge that enabled the transformation of iron through fire and mechanical processing. However, the social standing of blacksmiths and religious beliefs about the material varied considerably between communities. The present iron sculpture has been culturally attributed to the Mumuye people. Whether its form actually corresponds to a specific Mumuye tradition or originated within a broader regional context cannot be definitively determined without documented comparative objects.
Formal Language and Possible Symbolism
The object's unusual shape opens up various possibilities for iconographic interpretation. The large upper curve is reminiscent of a bent neck, a sickle-shaped head, or an abstract animal form. The two smaller, lower curves could be interpreted as further anatomical allusions. The pointed projections, in particular, lend the form a certain resemblance to stylized beaks, horns, or other animal features. However, a definitive identification as a bird, snake, or other living being would be speculative. It could also be a symbolically designed iron object whose form does not explicitly intend a representational image. In various West African meta-cultures All traditions feature highly abstracted figures and symbols whose meaning only becomes clear from their original ritual or social context. The flowing lines could suggest notions of movement, vitality, or transformation. However, such interpretations should not be considered definitive cultural statements. The designation as a sculpture initially describes the object's current aesthetic perception, while its original purpose may have been more functional or ceremonial.
Possible Ritual Function
Forged iron objects could be part of protective rituals, ceremonial acts, or religious institutions in various societies of northeastern Nigeria. In certain regional traditions, metal objects were associated with spiritual powers, while others served as symbols of rank, implements, or symbolic attributes. Due to its slender form and the small eyelet at the bottom, the present form may originally have been mounted, placed on a surface, or integrated into a larger object arrangement. Its use as a finial, emblem, or component of ritual equipment seems plausible. Its resemblance to a functional hook or staff device should also be considered. The sweeping upper curve and the two lateral extensions may have served a practical purpose in addition to their symbolic function. Without information on the original context of discovery or acquisition, possible signs of use, and comparable ethnographic pieces, it is impossible to distinguish between these possibilities. Therefore, a concrete use in ancestor worship, initiations, or in connection with healing rituals has not been proven.
Art Historical Analysis
From an art historical perspective, the object bears a remarkable resemblance to an abstract, linear conception of sculpture. Unlike sculpture developed from closed volumes, its spatial effect arises almost exclusively from the movement of a slender iron form in space. The long vertical shaft forms a calm, stabilizing axis, while the upper section develops a series of increasingly sweeping curves. This composition creates a dynamic transition from static rectilinearity to dynamic movement. The large upper curve appears almost to float and lends the otherwise strictly vertical form a pronounced horizontal extension. The smaller hooks and points in the central area mediate between these two directions. The significance of the surrounding void is particularly noteworthy. The curved iron sections enclose open areas that become essential components of the overall sculptural effect. The viewer thus perceives not only the forged material but also the spaces it creates. From today's perspective, this aesthetic quality is reminiscent of principles in modern abstract metal sculpture. However, such a formal parallel should not be equated with a historical influence or a shared artistic intention. The traditional ironworking of the Benue region developed its own technical, social, and design prerequisites. The mastery of wrought iron is particularly evident here in the controlled creation of tight bends, the gradual alteration of the material's cross-section, and the precisely pointed ends. The irregular oxidation surface reinforces the sculpture's material character and forms a captivating contrast to the elegance of its contours.
Art Historical Assessment
The exceptional quality of this iron sculpture attributed to Mumuye lies in its extraordinary formal concentration. With just a few forged lines, a complex, rhythmically dynamic form emerges, its expressiveness arising from the interplay of material, contour, and negative space. The large, crescent-like curve lends the object a distinctive silhouette, while the smaller hook-like forms create a subtle inner tension. As a testament to a regional tradition of ironworking, the sculpture illustrates the creative possibilities of a material that could be used for both practical and symbolic purposes. Its contemporary aesthetic impact is undeniable, yet its original function, precise cultural context, and dating remain unclear without further documentation. It is precisely this combination of meticulous craftsmanship, radical abstraction, and potential symbolic meaning that makes the object a remarkable example of West African metalwork.
Literature
Frank Herreman (ed.): Mumuye Sculpture: Nigeria. The African Museum, Berg en Dal, 1997.
Karl-Ferdinand Schaedler: Earth and Ore: 2500 Years of African Art in Terra-Cotta and Metal. Panterra Verlag, Munich, 1997.
The publications mentioned serve to provide a general art historical context for Mumuye art and African metalworking traditions. They do not constitute direct documentation of the iron object in question or a definitive determination of its original function.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31209
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Mumuye
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Black iron
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A iron sculpture
Height
67 cm
Weight
800 g
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
