A wooden sculpture - Luba - DR Congo (No reserve price)
05
days
04
hours
12
minutes
02
seconds
Current bid
€ 3
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 330
 | €3 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €2 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A wooden sculpture titled Janus Staff Sculpture of the Luba – Anthropomorphic Ceremonial Staff with Double Faces, originating from the Tanganyika Region in the Democratic Republic of Congo, attributed to the Luba culture, carved in wood, about 35 cm high and weighing 250 g, in fair condition, authentic/original.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Janus Staff Sculpture of the Luba – Anthropomorphic Ceremonial Staff with Double Faces
Origin: Tanganyika Region, Democratic Republic of Congo
Cultural Attribution: Luba
Material: Wood, carved, dark patinated surface
Dating: Uncertain
Description
This exceptionally slender, vertically oriented wooden sculpture depicts an anthropomorphic ceremonial staff, the upper end of which is formed by a Janus head with two opposing faces. The composition is characterized by a remarkable formal unity, in which the elongated, largely unornamented shaft and the intricately detailed figurative crowning element combine to form a harmonious whole. The staff-like body has a slightly concave middle section and widens both towards the top and the rounded base. Its dark, in places silky-glossy surface shows fine signs of wear, scratches, and reddish-brown abrasions that reveal the warm wood tone beneath the almost black patina. The two faces of the Janus head are characterized by meticulous modeling of their features. Almond-shaped eyes framed by curved lids, a narrow, prominent nose, and sculpted lips lend the physiognomies a calm, focused expression. The sides are articulated by geometrically arranged hair or ornamental elements. Diagonal lines connect the facial features to the elongated neck, reinforcing the sculptural intertwining of the two heads. Above the crowning element is a short, cylindrical projection with a lateral opening, the original function of which is unclear. The sculpture rests on a modern, circular display base.
Art Historical Analysis
The art of the Luba people, whose historical settlements extended across large parts of the southeastern Congo Basin, is among the most important courtly and ceremonial artistic traditions of Central Africa. Particularly in connection with the historical Luba kingdom, differentiated forms of sculptural representation developed, in which political legitimacy, genealogical knowledge, and spiritual authority were closely intertwined. Characteristic object types include caryatid stools, headrests, staffs, commemorative objects, and anthropomorphic figures. The art-historical significance of these works lies not only in their aesthetic design but also in their function as material carriers of social memory and institutionalized power. Within this tradition, ceremonial staffs occupy a special position. They could serve as symbols of rank, dignity, and political authority and were sometimes integrated into the symbolic acts of courtly representation. Due to its elongated shaft and figurative crowning, the present object can generally be compared with this group of objects. However, the double-sided design of the head represents a distinctive iconographic feature, the precise classification of which within the Luba tradition requires further comparative analysis. The attribution to the Tanganyika region should be understood as a traditional indication of origin. A more precise localization of the workshop or a specific regional style group is not possible based on the photograph.
Symbolism and Iconography
The Janus motif, the union of two oppositely oriented human faces within a shared sculptural structure, opens up a variety of symbolic interpretations. In various African art traditions, multifaceted representations can express ideas of comprehensive perception, complementary forces, or the connection between different spheres of existence. For the Luba culture, the significance of memory, genealogical continuity, and the mediation between the current political order and inherited notions of authority is particularly noteworthy. Against this backdrop, the double orientation of the faces on the staff could be interpreted as a symbol of perception extending beyond a single point of view. The two heads would thus not necessarily represent different individuals, but could allude to the simultaneity of different perspectives. Likewise, a symbolic relationship between past and present, or between the visible and invisible worlds, is conceivable. However, such interpretations remain hypothetical, as no documented iconographic tradition exists for this specific object. The meaning of geometrically structured hairstyles or head ornaments cannot be definitively determined without further ethnographic comparisons. Their meticulous execution underscores the significance of the human head as the central expressive element of the composition is nevertheless significant.
Ritual Function and Social Significance
Ceremonial staffs of the Luba could function as visible insignia of authority and dignity within political and social contexts. In certain historical contexts, such objects were associated with the legitimation of rule, the commemoration of important ancestors, or the public display of institutional hierarchies. Their meaning arose from the interplay of material design, social attribution, and ceremonial use. For the present Janus staff, such a use is conceivable in principle, but not proven. The lateral opening of the cylindrical head could indicate a previous attachment, a lost additional element, or another constructive function. A definitive interpretation as a receptacle for ritual substances, however, would not be justified without material analysis. Likewise, it cannot be determined whether the object was originally carried, displayed, or used as part of a larger ceremonial apparatus. The dark patinated surface could have resulted from handling, surface treatment, and aging processes; It does not, in itself, constitute evidence of a specific ritual use.
Art Historical Assessment
The aesthetic distinctiveness of this Janus staff sculpture lies in the consistent juxtaposition of formal reduction and concentrated figurative detail. While the elongated shaft, through its almost architectural simplicity, creates a serene vertical movement, the sculptural design intensifies in the area of the double-faced crowning element into a complex interplay of curved lines and carefully modeled volumes. The two faces appear as equal components of a shared sculptural concept, giving the sculpture a pronounced spatial presence regardless of the viewer's perspective. The harmonious proportions, the controlled surface treatment, and the subtle tension between the abstract basic form and the human physiognomy lend the object remarkable expressiveness. Subject to cultural attribution, the staff can be considered a characteristic example of that Central African approach to art in which figurative sculpture and ceremonial object design are inextricably linked. Its particular art historical significance stems from the unusual combination of a double-sided anthropomorphic head with a deliberately simple, elongated support form.
Literature
Mary Nooter Roberts and Allen F. Roberts (eds.): Memory: Luba Art and the Making of History. New York: The Museum for African Art, 1996.
François Neyt: Luba: Aux sources du Zaïre. Paris: Musée Dapper, 1993.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31658
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Janus Staff Sculpture of the Luba – Anthropomorphic Ceremonial Staff with Double Faces
Origin: Tanganyika Region, Democratic Republic of Congo
Cultural Attribution: Luba
Material: Wood, carved, dark patinated surface
Dating: Uncertain
Description
This exceptionally slender, vertically oriented wooden sculpture depicts an anthropomorphic ceremonial staff, the upper end of which is formed by a Janus head with two opposing faces. The composition is characterized by a remarkable formal unity, in which the elongated, largely unornamented shaft and the intricately detailed figurative crowning element combine to form a harmonious whole. The staff-like body has a slightly concave middle section and widens both towards the top and the rounded base. Its dark, in places silky-glossy surface shows fine signs of wear, scratches, and reddish-brown abrasions that reveal the warm wood tone beneath the almost black patina. The two faces of the Janus head are characterized by meticulous modeling of their features. Almond-shaped eyes framed by curved lids, a narrow, prominent nose, and sculpted lips lend the physiognomies a calm, focused expression. The sides are articulated by geometrically arranged hair or ornamental elements. Diagonal lines connect the facial features to the elongated neck, reinforcing the sculptural intertwining of the two heads. Above the crowning element is a short, cylindrical projection with a lateral opening, the original function of which is unclear. The sculpture rests on a modern, circular display base.
Art Historical Analysis
The art of the Luba people, whose historical settlements extended across large parts of the southeastern Congo Basin, is among the most important courtly and ceremonial artistic traditions of Central Africa. Particularly in connection with the historical Luba kingdom, differentiated forms of sculptural representation developed, in which political legitimacy, genealogical knowledge, and spiritual authority were closely intertwined. Characteristic object types include caryatid stools, headrests, staffs, commemorative objects, and anthropomorphic figures. The art-historical significance of these works lies not only in their aesthetic design but also in their function as material carriers of social memory and institutionalized power. Within this tradition, ceremonial staffs occupy a special position. They could serve as symbols of rank, dignity, and political authority and were sometimes integrated into the symbolic acts of courtly representation. Due to its elongated shaft and figurative crowning, the present object can generally be compared with this group of objects. However, the double-sided design of the head represents a distinctive iconographic feature, the precise classification of which within the Luba tradition requires further comparative analysis. The attribution to the Tanganyika region should be understood as a traditional indication of origin. A more precise localization of the workshop or a specific regional style group is not possible based on the photograph.
Symbolism and Iconography
The Janus motif, the union of two oppositely oriented human faces within a shared sculptural structure, opens up a variety of symbolic interpretations. In various African art traditions, multifaceted representations can express ideas of comprehensive perception, complementary forces, or the connection between different spheres of existence. For the Luba culture, the significance of memory, genealogical continuity, and the mediation between the current political order and inherited notions of authority is particularly noteworthy. Against this backdrop, the double orientation of the faces on the staff could be interpreted as a symbol of perception extending beyond a single point of view. The two heads would thus not necessarily represent different individuals, but could allude to the simultaneity of different perspectives. Likewise, a symbolic relationship between past and present, or between the visible and invisible worlds, is conceivable. However, such interpretations remain hypothetical, as no documented iconographic tradition exists for this specific object. The meaning of geometrically structured hairstyles or head ornaments cannot be definitively determined without further ethnographic comparisons. Their meticulous execution underscores the significance of the human head as the central expressive element of the composition is nevertheless significant.
Ritual Function and Social Significance
Ceremonial staffs of the Luba could function as visible insignia of authority and dignity within political and social contexts. In certain historical contexts, such objects were associated with the legitimation of rule, the commemoration of important ancestors, or the public display of institutional hierarchies. Their meaning arose from the interplay of material design, social attribution, and ceremonial use. For the present Janus staff, such a use is conceivable in principle, but not proven. The lateral opening of the cylindrical head could indicate a previous attachment, a lost additional element, or another constructive function. A definitive interpretation as a receptacle for ritual substances, however, would not be justified without material analysis. Likewise, it cannot be determined whether the object was originally carried, displayed, or used as part of a larger ceremonial apparatus. The dark patinated surface could have resulted from handling, surface treatment, and aging processes; It does not, in itself, constitute evidence of a specific ritual use.
Art Historical Assessment
The aesthetic distinctiveness of this Janus staff sculpture lies in the consistent juxtaposition of formal reduction and concentrated figurative detail. While the elongated shaft, through its almost architectural simplicity, creates a serene vertical movement, the sculptural design intensifies in the area of the double-faced crowning element into a complex interplay of curved lines and carefully modeled volumes. The two faces appear as equal components of a shared sculptural concept, giving the sculpture a pronounced spatial presence regardless of the viewer's perspective. The harmonious proportions, the controlled surface treatment, and the subtle tension between the abstract basic form and the human physiognomy lend the object remarkable expressiveness. Subject to cultural attribution, the staff can be considered a characteristic example of that Central African approach to art in which figurative sculpture and ceremonial object design are inextricably linked. Its particular art historical significance stems from the unusual combination of a double-sided anthropomorphic head with a deliberately simple, elongated support form.
Literature
Mary Nooter Roberts and Allen F. Roberts (eds.): Memory: Luba Art and the Making of History. New York: The Museum for African Art, 1996.
François Neyt: Luba: Aux sources du Zaïre. Paris: Musée Dapper, 1993.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31658
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Luba
Country of Origin
DR Congo
Material
Wood
Sold with stand
No
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A wooden sculpture
Height
35 cm
Weight
250 g
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
