A wooden sculpture - Prampram - Ghana (No reserve price)
05
days
00
hours
27
minutes
49
seconds
Current bid
€ 4
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 700 - € 850
 | €4 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €1 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A wooden sculpture, a pair of Prampram anthropomorphic figures from Southern Ghana, carved wood with a light gray-beige patina; height 87 cm, weight 10.5 kg, sold with stand, original/authentic.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Anthropomorphic Figure Pair of Prampram – Two Kneeling Wooden Sculptures with Raised Arms
Origin: Southern Ghana, Prampram Region, Greater Accra Region
Cultural Attribution: Prampram, Dangme (Ga-Adangme) cultural milieu
Material: Carved wood, light gray to beige patina, partial surface deposits
Dating: Not certain
Provenance: Southern Ghana, according to the original provenance information
Description
This ensemble, consisting of two nearly identical anthropomorphic wooden figures, is characterized by an exceptionally expressive posture and a consistently abstract formal language. Both sculptures depict kneeling or squatting human figures, their elongated torsos crowned by spherical heads on slender, cylindrical necks. The faces are reduced to a few features. Small, dot-like indentations mark the eyes, while narrow, vertical ridges suggest the noses. The modeling of the mouth, cheeks, and ears is largely absent. The posture of the arms is particularly characteristic: bent at the sides with the forearms extended vertically upwards. The hands do not appear anatomically differentiated, but rather taper into pointed projections. This gesture lends the figures a remarkable dynamism and suggests a ceremonial gesture of rising, calling, or receiving. The cylindrical torsos are almost entirely unarticulated and feature several small, regularly spaced indentations along their fronts. Irregular, knot-like protrusions emerge laterally, possibly representing anatomical details or symbolic elements. The legs are sharply bent, and their pointed lower legs create a wide-open, dynamic silhouette. Both figures have a light, grayish-beige surface with darker discolorations, occasional cracks, and clear signs of weathering. The sculptures are mounted on separate, modern black display pedestals.
Art Historical Analysis
The Prampram region on Ghana's southern Atlantic coast belongs to the historical settlement area of the Dangme people, who are linguistically and culturally closely connected to the neighboring Ga people. Within this coastal region, diverse artistic and religious traditions developed, their material expressions shaped by local religious communities, family structures, and supra-regional exchange networks. Figurative wood sculpture occupies a special position within this context, although numerous local object types have thus far been insufficiently documented in art historical research compared to the better-known sculptural traditions of the Akan or other West African societies. The present pair of figures, due to their highly abstracted body design and striking arm positions, can be placed within the broader context of anthropomorphic wood sculptures from southeastern Ghana. The pronounced verticality of the bodies, the spherical heads, and the limbs reduced to a few linear elements demonstrate a distinctive sculptural conception that focuses not on the naturalistic representation of human anatomy, but rather on the symbolically condensed depiction of a specific posture. Particularly noteworthy is the almost identical design of both figures, which could indicate a deliberate compositional unity. However, it cannot be determined with certainty whether they were originally created as a pair or originate from a larger group of similar sculptures. A precise attribution to a specific local workshop or a documented ritual figure type is also not possible based on the available photograph. Therefore, the cultural attribution to the Prampram region remains provisional.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic peculiarity of the two figures lies primarily in their unusual posture. The bent legs and upward-pointing arms form an expressive gesture whose meaning seems to extend beyond a purely anatomical representation. In various African pictorial traditions, raised arms can appear as an expression of invocation, veneration, supplication, or spiritual communication. However, a direct application of these interpretations to the sculptures in question would not be justified without corresponding ethnographic evidence. Nevertheless, the figures' posture opens the possibility of viewing them as representations of a ceremonial or symbolically significant moment. The kneeling or squatting position could indicate a special relationship with a higher power or a state of ritual concentration. It is also conceivable that t he figures represent a specific social role or a defined physical action. The spherical heads appear almost faceless, thus possessing a strikingly transpersonal effect. The reduction of personal characteristics could indicate that the intention was not to depict individual historical figures, but rather general human or spiritual concepts. The small depressions on the front of the torsos deserve particular attention. Their relatively regular arrangement could have an ornamental, symbolic, or originally functional meaning. Whether they served to hold additional materials or were simply part of the sculptural design cannot be determined. The lateral projections also allow for different interpretations, without a clear iconographic classification being possible.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
In the traditional religious life of Ga Dangme societies, local deities, spiritual guardians, and the relationship between the human community and the supernatural world held a historically significant position. Certain material objects could serve within such contexts as signs of spiritual presence, as components of shrines, or as aids to ceremonial acts. A use for these two wooden figures is conceivable in principle, but not documented. The strikingly expressive arm position could refer to a gesture that held particular significance within a ritual context. The crouching posture and the consistent upward orientation of the arms could be interpreted as a sculptural condensation of an action. Likewise, their use as a symbolic pair of figures within a family or communal shrine is conceivable. The light-colored surfaces with their irregular deposits and discolorations could have resulted from prolonged display, repeated handling, or natural aging processes. Whether they were treated with ritual substances cannot be determined without material analysis. The largely identical design of both figures could indicate a shared function. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether their paired presentation corresponds to an original cultural order or stems from a later arrangement.
Art Historical Assessment
The special aesthetic quality of this pair of figures lies in the impressive combination of radical anatomical simplification and exceptional gestural expressiveness. The elongated, almost cylindrical bodies form serene vertical axes, while the angled arms and legs disrupt this order with rhythmic movement. The spherical heads add a striking sculptural accent and lend the figures a pronounced presence despite their largely featureless appearance. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the closed volumes of the torsos and the far-reaching, tapering limbs. This creates open spaces that contribute significantly to the spatial effect of the sculptures. The two figures do not appear static, but rather seem to be captured in a moment of concentrated physical activity. Their nearly identical posture reinforces the impression of a shared action and lends the ensemble a remarkable compositional unity. The light, irregularly patinated surfaces underscore the organic character of the carved wood and form a restrained contrast to the expressive silhouette. Subject to cultural attribution, the pair of figures can be considered a remarkable example of abstracting anthropomorphic wood sculpture from the southern Ghanaian coastal region. Its art historical significance lies particularly in the unusual combination of symbolic body design, gestural intensity, and potential symbolic pairing.
Literature
For cultural-historical classification, ethnographic studies of the Ga Dangme societies of southern Ghana and their religious traditions can be consulted. No definitive art historical publication directly related to this specific type of figure could be found. Further identification requires comparison with documented collections and ethnographically verified objects from the Prampram region.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31853
Height: 87 cm / 80 cm
Weight: 4,9 kg / 5,6 kg (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Anthropomorphic Figure Pair of Prampram – Two Kneeling Wooden Sculptures with Raised Arms
Origin: Southern Ghana, Prampram Region, Greater Accra Region
Cultural Attribution: Prampram, Dangme (Ga-Adangme) cultural milieu
Material: Carved wood, light gray to beige patina, partial surface deposits
Dating: Not certain
Provenance: Southern Ghana, according to the original provenance information
Description
This ensemble, consisting of two nearly identical anthropomorphic wooden figures, is characterized by an exceptionally expressive posture and a consistently abstract formal language. Both sculptures depict kneeling or squatting human figures, their elongated torsos crowned by spherical heads on slender, cylindrical necks. The faces are reduced to a few features. Small, dot-like indentations mark the eyes, while narrow, vertical ridges suggest the noses. The modeling of the mouth, cheeks, and ears is largely absent. The posture of the arms is particularly characteristic: bent at the sides with the forearms extended vertically upwards. The hands do not appear anatomically differentiated, but rather taper into pointed projections. This gesture lends the figures a remarkable dynamism and suggests a ceremonial gesture of rising, calling, or receiving. The cylindrical torsos are almost entirely unarticulated and feature several small, regularly spaced indentations along their fronts. Irregular, knot-like protrusions emerge laterally, possibly representing anatomical details or symbolic elements. The legs are sharply bent, and their pointed lower legs create a wide-open, dynamic silhouette. Both figures have a light, grayish-beige surface with darker discolorations, occasional cracks, and clear signs of weathering. The sculptures are mounted on separate, modern black display pedestals.
Art Historical Analysis
The Prampram region on Ghana's southern Atlantic coast belongs to the historical settlement area of the Dangme people, who are linguistically and culturally closely connected to the neighboring Ga people. Within this coastal region, diverse artistic and religious traditions developed, their material expressions shaped by local religious communities, family structures, and supra-regional exchange networks. Figurative wood sculpture occupies a special position within this context, although numerous local object types have thus far been insufficiently documented in art historical research compared to the better-known sculptural traditions of the Akan or other West African societies. The present pair of figures, due to their highly abstracted body design and striking arm positions, can be placed within the broader context of anthropomorphic wood sculptures from southeastern Ghana. The pronounced verticality of the bodies, the spherical heads, and the limbs reduced to a few linear elements demonstrate a distinctive sculptural conception that focuses not on the naturalistic representation of human anatomy, but rather on the symbolically condensed depiction of a specific posture. Particularly noteworthy is the almost identical design of both figures, which could indicate a deliberate compositional unity. However, it cannot be determined with certainty whether they were originally created as a pair or originate from a larger group of similar sculptures. A precise attribution to a specific local workshop or a documented ritual figure type is also not possible based on the available photograph. Therefore, the cultural attribution to the Prampram region remains provisional.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic peculiarity of the two figures lies primarily in their unusual posture. The bent legs and upward-pointing arms form an expressive gesture whose meaning seems to extend beyond a purely anatomical representation. In various African pictorial traditions, raised arms can appear as an expression of invocation, veneration, supplication, or spiritual communication. However, a direct application of these interpretations to the sculptures in question would not be justified without corresponding ethnographic evidence. Nevertheless, the figures' posture opens the possibility of viewing them as representations of a ceremonial or symbolically significant moment. The kneeling or squatting position could indicate a special relationship with a higher power or a state of ritual concentration. It is also conceivable that t he figures represent a specific social role or a defined physical action. The spherical heads appear almost faceless, thus possessing a strikingly transpersonal effect. The reduction of personal characteristics could indicate that the intention was not to depict individual historical figures, but rather general human or spiritual concepts. The small depressions on the front of the torsos deserve particular attention. Their relatively regular arrangement could have an ornamental, symbolic, or originally functional meaning. Whether they served to hold additional materials or were simply part of the sculptural design cannot be determined. The lateral projections also allow for different interpretations, without a clear iconographic classification being possible.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
In the traditional religious life of Ga Dangme societies, local deities, spiritual guardians, and the relationship between the human community and the supernatural world held a historically significant position. Certain material objects could serve within such contexts as signs of spiritual presence, as components of shrines, or as aids to ceremonial acts. A use for these two wooden figures is conceivable in principle, but not documented. The strikingly expressive arm position could refer to a gesture that held particular significance within a ritual context. The crouching posture and the consistent upward orientation of the arms could be interpreted as a sculptural condensation of an action. Likewise, their use as a symbolic pair of figures within a family or communal shrine is conceivable. The light-colored surfaces with their irregular deposits and discolorations could have resulted from prolonged display, repeated handling, or natural aging processes. Whether they were treated with ritual substances cannot be determined without material analysis. The largely identical design of both figures could indicate a shared function. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether their paired presentation corresponds to an original cultural order or stems from a later arrangement.
Art Historical Assessment
The special aesthetic quality of this pair of figures lies in the impressive combination of radical anatomical simplification and exceptional gestural expressiveness. The elongated, almost cylindrical bodies form serene vertical axes, while the angled arms and legs disrupt this order with rhythmic movement. The spherical heads add a striking sculptural accent and lend the figures a pronounced presence despite their largely featureless appearance. Particularly noteworthy is the relationship between the closed volumes of the torsos and the far-reaching, tapering limbs. This creates open spaces that contribute significantly to the spatial effect of the sculptures. The two figures do not appear static, but rather seem to be captured in a moment of concentrated physical activity. Their nearly identical posture reinforces the impression of a shared action and lends the ensemble a remarkable compositional unity. The light, irregularly patinated surfaces underscore the organic character of the carved wood and form a restrained contrast to the expressive silhouette. Subject to cultural attribution, the pair of figures can be considered a remarkable example of abstracting anthropomorphic wood sculpture from the southern Ghanaian coastal region. Its art historical significance lies particularly in the unusual combination of symbolic body design, gestural intensity, and potential symbolic pairing.
Literature
For cultural-historical classification, ethnographic studies of the Ga Dangme societies of southern Ghana and their religious traditions can be consulted. No definitive art historical publication directly related to this specific type of figure could be found. Further identification requires comparison with documented collections and ethnographically verified objects from the Prampram region.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31853
Height: 87 cm / 80 cm
Weight: 4,9 kg / 5,6 kg (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Prampram
Country of Origin
Ghana
Material
Wood
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A wooden sculpture
Height
87 cm
Weight
10.5 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
