A terracotta sculpture - Adamawa - Nigeria (No reserve price)
04
days
13
hours
50
minutes
37
seconds
Current bid
€ 10
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 330
 | €10 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €5 | |
 | €3 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A terracotta sculpture from Nigeria, attributed to the Adamawa cultural area, origin Adamawa Region, Nigeria, sold with stand, height 30 cm, weight 1.6 kg, in fair condition and authentic as original/official.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Anthropomorphic Terracotta Sculpture with Zoomorphic Crown – Adamawa, Nigeria
Origin: Adamawa Region, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Adamawa cultural area, precise ethnic attribution uncertain
Material: Fired clay, reddish-ochre terracotta with mineral deposits and partial surface erosion, incl stand.
Dating: Uncertain
Provenance: Adamawa Region, Nigeria, according to the known provenance
Description
This extraordinary terracotta sculpture combines a voluminous, anthropomorphic-looking body with an expressively designed, zoomorphic crown. The squat, downward-curving torso has an almost pear-shaped silhouette, its smooth surface articulated by several raised, three-dimensional features. Two short, rounded projections emerge from the sides, possibly representing abstracted arms or other physical attributes. A circular protrusion is visible at the bottom, the iconographic significance of which remains unclear. Above the torso, the figure tapers to a cylindrical neck, framed by a robust, horizontally encircling ridge. This ring-shaped division forms a distinct three-dimensional separation between the lower body and the crowning element above. The upper section features a highly stylized animal head with elongated, laterally and downward-curving appendages. Particularly striking is the large, rounded opening at the front, which could be interpreted as a wide-open mouth, a snout, or a structural element. Above this opening are small, three-dimensional protrusions with dot-like depressions, possibly representing eyes or nostrils. The lateral, horn-like curves lend the head a dynamic silhouette and are vaguely reminiscent of a cow's horns or the abstracted head appendages of another animal. A definitive zoological identification is not possible. The surface has a warm hue, ranging from light ochre and sandy beige to reddish-brown. Fine pores, irregular depressions, and partial deposits reveal the handcrafted nature of the clay. The sculpture rests on a modern, color-matched cylindrical base.
Art Historical Analysis
The Adamawa region in northeastern Nigeria is part of an exceptionally diverse cultural area, whose historical development was shaped by the interaction between the savannah landscapes of Central Africa and the Benue River system. Within this expansive cultural sphere, diverse ceramic traditions emerged, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic sculptures. Particularly well-known are the terracotta works of various ethnic groups in the Adamawa and upper Benue regions, including the Longuda, whose ceramic pictorial traditions are characterized by a remarkable diversity of figurative and abstract forms. The Longuda are especially renowned for their terracotta objects known as kwandalha, which have been associated with healing practices and other ritual acts in ethnographic contexts. These works can combine human and animal features and are sometimes characterized by a highly abstract sculptural style. The present object, with its combination of a squat torso and an unusual zoomorphic crown, exhibits certain formal similarities to ceramic traditions of the Adamawa region. However, this does not allow for a direct attribution to the Longuda culture or to a specific kwandalha type. The possibility that it was originally a figurative vessel or a ceramic ritual object with a functional opening must also be considered. The large opening in the head area could have had a practical purpose, the precise determination of which would require additional views and an examination of the internal construction. Therefore, the art historical classification remains deliberately limited to the broader Adamawa cultural sphere.
Symbolism and Iconography
The sculpture's iconographic distinctiveness lies in the combination of different physical forms. The lower section, with its upright posture, lateral projections, and closed, corporeal form, conveys an anthropomorphic impression, while the upper part, with its horn-like protrusions and large frontal opening, clearly evokes zoomorphic associations. This combination could point to a symbolic fusion of human and animal characteristics. In numerous African pictorial traditions, animals hold a special significance as bearers of certain forces could be interpreted as symbols of social characteristics or as mediators between different spheres of existence. Such an interpretation is conceivable for the present object, but cannot be considered certain without specific ethnographic evidence. The horn-like protrusions could refer to a cow or another horned animal. It is also possible that the design is free and not directly zoological in nature. The large opening on the front is the most expressive element of the composition. Its position suggests a wide-open mouth and could thus evoke ideas of voice, invocation, or the intake or release of certain substances. Whether such a symbolic meaning was actually intended remains unclear. The sculptural protrusions on the torso could represent anatomical features, ornamental accents, or functional components. It is precisely the deliberate ambiguity between human form, animal, and possible vessel that lends the sculpture its particular iconographic tension.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
Ceramic objects from the Adamawa region could fulfill practical, religious, and medical-ritual functions within various local societies. Terracotta works, particularly those associated with the Longuda culture, are known for their use in healing practices, protective imagery, and the manipulation of spiritual forces. Figurative forms and functional elements could be closely intertwined. Such a use would be conceivable for the present sculpture, especially if the striking opening in the upper section originally served to hold or pour a substance. However, the photograph does not reveal whether the object has a continuous cavity or whether the opening was merely a sculptural element. It is also unknown whether the sculpture was used in a shrine, in a domestic setting, or in communal ceremonies. The surviving surface shows clear signs of natural change, but does not allow for a reliable distinction between wear and tear, deposits, and later aging processes. An interpretation as a healing object, protective figure, or ritual vessel must therefore remain hypothetical. Only a detailed examination of the construction, any potential residues, and documented comparative objects could enable a more precise determination of its function.
Art Historical Assessment
The unique aesthetic quality of this terracotta sculpture lies in the striking juxtaposition of closed, serene volumes and dynamically expansive forms. The compact torso conveys stability and material weight, while the sweeping projections of the crown create a lively, almost animated silhouette. The ring-shaped neck forms an essential compositional link between these two areas. The large frontal opening breaks the closedness of the upper volume and creates a striking contrast between the sculptural mass and the negative space. Also noteworthy is the restrained surface treatment, which eschews elaborate ornamental patterns and instead emphasizes the impact of the fundamental forms. The warm, earthy tones underscore the raw character of the ceramic material and lend the figure a serene, almost archaic presence. Within the broader context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, this object can be considered an interesting example of a pictorial approach in which anthropomorphic and zoomorphic elements merge into a unique sculptural unity. Its art historical significance lies particularly in its unusual form and the open relationship between figurative representation and potential functional purpose. Subject to its cultural and chronological classification, the sculpture documents the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture within the diverse Adamawa cultural sphere.
Literature
Marla C. Berns, Richard Fardon, and Sidney Littlefield Kasfir (eds.): Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the Benue River Valley. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum at UCLA, 2011.
For a more comprehensive analysis, comparative studies of the ceramic traditions of the Longuda and other societies of the Adamawa region are particularly necessary. No scholarly publications directly related to this object are known.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31919
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Right party of the head has been built new
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Anthropomorphic Terracotta Sculpture with Zoomorphic Crown – Adamawa, Nigeria
Origin: Adamawa Region, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Adamawa cultural area, precise ethnic attribution uncertain
Material: Fired clay, reddish-ochre terracotta with mineral deposits and partial surface erosion, incl stand.
Dating: Uncertain
Provenance: Adamawa Region, Nigeria, according to the known provenance
Description
This extraordinary terracotta sculpture combines a voluminous, anthropomorphic-looking body with an expressively designed, zoomorphic crown. The squat, downward-curving torso has an almost pear-shaped silhouette, its smooth surface articulated by several raised, three-dimensional features. Two short, rounded projections emerge from the sides, possibly representing abstracted arms or other physical attributes. A circular protrusion is visible at the bottom, the iconographic significance of which remains unclear. Above the torso, the figure tapers to a cylindrical neck, framed by a robust, horizontally encircling ridge. This ring-shaped division forms a distinct three-dimensional separation between the lower body and the crowning element above. The upper section features a highly stylized animal head with elongated, laterally and downward-curving appendages. Particularly striking is the large, rounded opening at the front, which could be interpreted as a wide-open mouth, a snout, or a structural element. Above this opening are small, three-dimensional protrusions with dot-like depressions, possibly representing eyes or nostrils. The lateral, horn-like curves lend the head a dynamic silhouette and are vaguely reminiscent of a cow's horns or the abstracted head appendages of another animal. A definitive zoological identification is not possible. The surface has a warm hue, ranging from light ochre and sandy beige to reddish-brown. Fine pores, irregular depressions, and partial deposits reveal the handcrafted nature of the clay. The sculpture rests on a modern, color-matched cylindrical base.
Art Historical Analysis
The Adamawa region in northeastern Nigeria is part of an exceptionally diverse cultural area, whose historical development was shaped by the interaction between the savannah landscapes of Central Africa and the Benue River system. Within this expansive cultural sphere, diverse ceramic traditions emerged, encompassing both functional vessels and anthropomorphic and zoomorphic sculptures. Particularly well-known are the terracotta works of various ethnic groups in the Adamawa and upper Benue regions, including the Longuda, whose ceramic pictorial traditions are characterized by a remarkable diversity of figurative and abstract forms. The Longuda are especially renowned for their terracotta objects known as kwandalha, which have been associated with healing practices and other ritual acts in ethnographic contexts. These works can combine human and animal features and are sometimes characterized by a highly abstract sculptural style. The present object, with its combination of a squat torso and an unusual zoomorphic crown, exhibits certain formal similarities to ceramic traditions of the Adamawa region. However, this does not allow for a direct attribution to the Longuda culture or to a specific kwandalha type. The possibility that it was originally a figurative vessel or a ceramic ritual object with a functional opening must also be considered. The large opening in the head area could have had a practical purpose, the precise determination of which would require additional views and an examination of the internal construction. Therefore, the art historical classification remains deliberately limited to the broader Adamawa cultural sphere.
Symbolism and Iconography
The sculpture's iconographic distinctiveness lies in the combination of different physical forms. The lower section, with its upright posture, lateral projections, and closed, corporeal form, conveys an anthropomorphic impression, while the upper part, with its horn-like protrusions and large frontal opening, clearly evokes zoomorphic associations. This combination could point to a symbolic fusion of human and animal characteristics. In numerous African pictorial traditions, animals hold a special significance as bearers of certain forces could be interpreted as symbols of social characteristics or as mediators between different spheres of existence. Such an interpretation is conceivable for the present object, but cannot be considered certain without specific ethnographic evidence. The horn-like protrusions could refer to a cow or another horned animal. It is also possible that the design is free and not directly zoological in nature. The large opening on the front is the most expressive element of the composition. Its position suggests a wide-open mouth and could thus evoke ideas of voice, invocation, or the intake or release of certain substances. Whether such a symbolic meaning was actually intended remains unclear. The sculptural protrusions on the torso could represent anatomical features, ornamental accents, or functional components. It is precisely the deliberate ambiguity between human form, animal, and possible vessel that lends the sculpture its particular iconographic tension.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
Ceramic objects from the Adamawa region could fulfill practical, religious, and medical-ritual functions within various local societies. Terracotta works, particularly those associated with the Longuda culture, are known for their use in healing practices, protective imagery, and the manipulation of spiritual forces. Figurative forms and functional elements could be closely intertwined. Such a use would be conceivable for the present sculpture, especially if the striking opening in the upper section originally served to hold or pour a substance. However, the photograph does not reveal whether the object has a continuous cavity or whether the opening was merely a sculptural element. It is also unknown whether the sculpture was used in a shrine, in a domestic setting, or in communal ceremonies. The surviving surface shows clear signs of natural change, but does not allow for a reliable distinction between wear and tear, deposits, and later aging processes. An interpretation as a healing object, protective figure, or ritual vessel must therefore remain hypothetical. Only a detailed examination of the construction, any potential residues, and documented comparative objects could enable a more precise determination of its function.
Art Historical Assessment
The unique aesthetic quality of this terracotta sculpture lies in the striking juxtaposition of closed, serene volumes and dynamically expansive forms. The compact torso conveys stability and material weight, while the sweeping projections of the crown create a lively, almost animated silhouette. The ring-shaped neck forms an essential compositional link between these two areas. The large frontal opening breaks the closedness of the upper volume and creates a striking contrast between the sculptural mass and the negative space. Also noteworthy is the restrained surface treatment, which eschews elaborate ornamental patterns and instead emphasizes the impact of the fundamental forms. The warm, earthy tones underscore the raw character of the ceramic material and lend the figure a serene, almost archaic presence. Within the broader context of the terracotta traditions of northeastern Nigeria, this object can be considered an interesting example of a pictorial approach in which anthropomorphic and zoomorphic elements merge into a unique sculptural unity. Its art historical significance lies particularly in its unusual form and the open relationship between figurative representation and potential functional purpose. Subject to its cultural and chronological classification, the sculpture documents the creative possibilities of ceramic sculpture within the diverse Adamawa cultural sphere.
Literature
Marla C. Berns, Richard Fardon, and Sidney Littlefield Kasfir (eds.): Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the Benue River Valley. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum at UCLA, 2011.
For a more comprehensive analysis, comparative studies of the ceramic traditions of the Longuda and other societies of the Adamawa region are particularly necessary. No scholarly publications directly related to this object are known.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ31919
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Right party of the head has been built new
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Adamawa
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Terracotta
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A terracotta sculpture
Height
30 cm
Weight
1.6 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
