A iron sculpture - Mumuye - Nigeria (No reserve price)
04
days
18
hours
57
minutes
35
seconds
Current bid
€ 21
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 330
 | €21 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €18 | |
 | €11 | |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A iron sculpture by the Mumuye, Nigeria, titled A iron sculpture, original/official with a stand, weighing 4.5 kg and standing 58 cm high, provenance Jalingo Region, Taraba State, Northeast Nigeria, in fair condition.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Anthropomorphic Iron Sculpture of the Mumuye People – Standing Figure with Elongated Limbs
Origin: Jalingo (Janligo) Region, Taraba State, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Mumuye, attributed
Material: Iron, presumably forged and joined, reddish-brown to dark brown oxidation patina, incl stand.
Dating: Not certain
Provenance: Jalingo Region, Nigeria, according to the known provenance
Description
This exceptionally slender iron sculpture depicts an upright anthropomorphic figure characterized by extreme elongation of body proportions and a dynamic, almost dance-like posture. The figure has a narrow, elongated torso that extends upwards into a strikingly thin neck. This supports a small, nearly spherical head with simplified, yet clearly recognizable facial features. The eyes appear as small, indented forms, while a narrow nose and a prominent mouth lend the face a calm, focused expression. The head is slightly tilted to the side and appears to turn towards the viewer. Particularly characteristic are the long, slender arms, which extend asymmetrically to the sides of the body. The right arm forms a wide arc, its lower section ending in a flattened, disc-like hand. The opposite arm initially falls diagonally downwards and transitions into a narrow, pointed extension. The legs are greatly elongated and slightly angled, creating an open, rhythmically articulated silhouette. Their ends form flat, forward-pointing feet. The body appears almost linear overall, with individual sections accentuated by slight thickenings and irregular transitions. The surface possesses a warm, reddish-brown oxidation patina with darker depressions and, in places, rough, irregular textures. The object is mounted on a modern black display base.
Art Historical Analysis
The Mumuye belong to the ethnic groups of the Upper Benue region in present-day northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas extend particularly across parts of Taraba State, including the landscapes around Jalingo, Zing, and adjacent regions. The artistic traditions of the Mumuye people became internationally known primarily through their anthropomorphic wooden sculptures, which are among the most distinctive figurative expressions of Central Nigeria. These figures are often characterized by elongated bodies, abstracted facial features, and a dynamic articulation of the limbs. Known by various local names, these sculptures could play a significant role within social and religious contexts. The present object, with its pronounced verticality, simplified anatomy, and dynamic arm posture, shares formal similarities with this artistic tradition. However, it differs significantly from the well-known carved wooden figures in its material and construction. The use of iron allows for a much greater resolution of the body into narrow, spatially expansive lines. While wooden sculptures develop their form from a closed volume of material, the present form arises from the connection of elongated metal sections, the spaces between which contribute significantly to the composition. A definitive classification within a documented Mumuye tradition of figurative iron sculpture is not possible based on the photograph alone. The cultural attribution should therefore be considered provisional. It also remains unclear whether the sculpture originated from an older local workshop tradition or represents a later artistic interpretation of regional formal concepts.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic effect of the sculpture is largely determined by the unusual posture of the human body. The small, slightly tilted head, the outstretched arms, and the bent legs create the impression of a figure in a moment of concentrated movement. This posture could be interpreted as a depiction of a dance, a ceremonial gesture, or some other physical action. However, a definitive interpretation is not possible. In various African pictorial traditions, certain body postures can possess social, religious, or symbolic meanings. The position of the arms, in particular, can indicate action, communication, or a special relationship to the surrounding world. However, for the figure in question, there is a lack of reliable ethnographic information that would allow for a concrete interpretation. The striking elongation of the neck and limbs could be understood as a deliberate departure from naturalistic body proportions. The human body does not appear as an anatomically closed unit, but rather as a system of interconnected lines and directions of movement. The asymmetrical design reinforces this impression. While one arm swings far outwards, the other follows a more vertical movement. The legs form an open, seemingly unstable stance, which is balanced by the broad feet. This formal tension lends the figure a special expressiveness, without necessarily implying a specific spiritual or social meaning.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
Within the traditional societies of the upper Benue region, anthropomorphic sculptures could fulfill various functions. For certain Mumuye wooden figures, connections to protective beliefs, healing practices, and the social authority of specialized individuals are documented. Such objects could hold special significance within communal or individual religious contexts. Whether comparable concepts were also relevant to the present iron sculpture cannot be proven. The unusual posture could suggest a ceremonial representation, but a direct comparison with documented Mumuye wooden figures would be methodologically problematic. The object could also have been created as an independent figurative work whose primary significance lay in its sculptural form. The elongated legs and flat feet suggest that the figure could originally be displayed freestanding or mounted on a base. Whether the current display pedestal reflects an original display situation remains unclear. The visible oxidation documents changes to the metal surface but does not allow for a reliable age determination. Nor can any particular ritual treatment be inferred from it. Further functional analysis would require information about the object's production, original use, and collection history.
Art Historical Assessment
The unique aesthetic quality of this iron sculpture lies in its extraordinary combination of figurative recognizability and radical formal reduction. The human body is reduced to a few elongated, interconnected elements, the arrangement of which creates a dynamic spatial composition. The figure possesses a pronounced verticality, emphasized by the long neck and slender legs. At the same time, the outstretched arms disrupt this order, lending the form a lively, almost dance-like dynamism. The relationship between material weight and visual lightness is particularly remarkable. Although iron is a resistant and relatively heavy material, the sculpture appears almost weightless due to its open spaces and slender limbs. The irregularly oxidized surface reinforces the impression of a form developed directly from the material itself. The small, meticulously modeled head provides a serene counterpoint to the dynamic posture and imbues the figure with a concentrated human presence. Within the broader art historical context of the figurative traditions of the Benue region, and subject to its cultural attribution, the object can be considered a remarkable example of linear, spatially open metal sculpture. Its particular significance lies in the independent transformation of human anatomy into an abstract, movement-oriented formal language. The sculpture impressively demonstrates how few sculptural elements can suffice to create a human figure of great expressiveness and spatial presence.
Literature
Frank Herreman (ed.): Mumuye: Sculpture from Nigeria – The Human Figure Reinvented. Brussels: Mercatorfonds, 2016.
Marla C. Berns, Richard Fardon, and Sidney Littlefield Kasfir (eds.): Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the Benue River Valley. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum at UCLA, 2011.
The publications mentioned above serve as a general art historical context for the figurative traditions of the Mumuye and the Benue region. A reliable literature reference directly related to this specific type of anthropomorphic iron sculpture is not currently available.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ32120
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Anthropomorphic Iron Sculpture of the Mumuye People – Standing Figure with Elongated Limbs
Origin: Jalingo (Janligo) Region, Taraba State, Northeast Nigeria
Cultural Attribution: Mumuye, attributed
Material: Iron, presumably forged and joined, reddish-brown to dark brown oxidation patina, incl stand.
Dating: Not certain
Provenance: Jalingo Region, Nigeria, according to the known provenance
Description
This exceptionally slender iron sculpture depicts an upright anthropomorphic figure characterized by extreme elongation of body proportions and a dynamic, almost dance-like posture. The figure has a narrow, elongated torso that extends upwards into a strikingly thin neck. This supports a small, nearly spherical head with simplified, yet clearly recognizable facial features. The eyes appear as small, indented forms, while a narrow nose and a prominent mouth lend the face a calm, focused expression. The head is slightly tilted to the side and appears to turn towards the viewer. Particularly characteristic are the long, slender arms, which extend asymmetrically to the sides of the body. The right arm forms a wide arc, its lower section ending in a flattened, disc-like hand. The opposite arm initially falls diagonally downwards and transitions into a narrow, pointed extension. The legs are greatly elongated and slightly angled, creating an open, rhythmically articulated silhouette. Their ends form flat, forward-pointing feet. The body appears almost linear overall, with individual sections accentuated by slight thickenings and irregular transitions. The surface possesses a warm, reddish-brown oxidation patina with darker depressions and, in places, rough, irregular textures. The object is mounted on a modern black display base.
Art Historical Analysis
The Mumuye belong to the ethnic groups of the Upper Benue region in present-day northeastern Nigeria. Their historical settlement areas extend particularly across parts of Taraba State, including the landscapes around Jalingo, Zing, and adjacent regions. The artistic traditions of the Mumuye people became internationally known primarily through their anthropomorphic wooden sculptures, which are among the most distinctive figurative expressions of Central Nigeria. These figures are often characterized by elongated bodies, abstracted facial features, and a dynamic articulation of the limbs. Known by various local names, these sculptures could play a significant role within social and religious contexts. The present object, with its pronounced verticality, simplified anatomy, and dynamic arm posture, shares formal similarities with this artistic tradition. However, it differs significantly from the well-known carved wooden figures in its material and construction. The use of iron allows for a much greater resolution of the body into narrow, spatially expansive lines. While wooden sculptures develop their form from a closed volume of material, the present form arises from the connection of elongated metal sections, the spaces between which contribute significantly to the composition. A definitive classification within a documented Mumuye tradition of figurative iron sculpture is not possible based on the photograph alone. The cultural attribution should therefore be considered provisional. It also remains unclear whether the sculpture originated from an older local workshop tradition or represents a later artistic interpretation of regional formal concepts.
Symbolism and Iconography
The iconographic effect of the sculpture is largely determined by the unusual posture of the human body. The small, slightly tilted head, the outstretched arms, and the bent legs create the impression of a figure in a moment of concentrated movement. This posture could be interpreted as a depiction of a dance, a ceremonial gesture, or some other physical action. However, a definitive interpretation is not possible. In various African pictorial traditions, certain body postures can possess social, religious, or symbolic meanings. The position of the arms, in particular, can indicate action, communication, or a special relationship to the surrounding world. However, for the figure in question, there is a lack of reliable ethnographic information that would allow for a concrete interpretation. The striking elongation of the neck and limbs could be understood as a deliberate departure from naturalistic body proportions. The human body does not appear as an anatomically closed unit, but rather as a system of interconnected lines and directions of movement. The asymmetrical design reinforces this impression. While one arm swings far outwards, the other follows a more vertical movement. The legs form an open, seemingly unstable stance, which is balanced by the broad feet. This formal tension lends the figure a special expressiveness, without necessarily implying a specific spiritual or social meaning.
Ritual Function and Cultural Context
Within the traditional societies of the upper Benue region, anthropomorphic sculptures could fulfill various functions. For certain Mumuye wooden figures, connections to protective beliefs, healing practices, and the social authority of specialized individuals are documented. Such objects could hold special significance within communal or individual religious contexts. Whether comparable concepts were also relevant to the present iron sculpture cannot be proven. The unusual posture could suggest a ceremonial representation, but a direct comparison with documented Mumuye wooden figures would be methodologically problematic. The object could also have been created as an independent figurative work whose primary significance lay in its sculptural form. The elongated legs and flat feet suggest that the figure could originally be displayed freestanding or mounted on a base. Whether the current display pedestal reflects an original display situation remains unclear. The visible oxidation documents changes to the metal surface but does not allow for a reliable age determination. Nor can any particular ritual treatment be inferred from it. Further functional analysis would require information about the object's production, original use, and collection history.
Art Historical Assessment
The unique aesthetic quality of this iron sculpture lies in its extraordinary combination of figurative recognizability and radical formal reduction. The human body is reduced to a few elongated, interconnected elements, the arrangement of which creates a dynamic spatial composition. The figure possesses a pronounced verticality, emphasized by the long neck and slender legs. At the same time, the outstretched arms disrupt this order, lending the form a lively, almost dance-like dynamism. The relationship between material weight and visual lightness is particularly remarkable. Although iron is a resistant and relatively heavy material, the sculpture appears almost weightless due to its open spaces and slender limbs. The irregularly oxidized surface reinforces the impression of a form developed directly from the material itself. The small, meticulously modeled head provides a serene counterpoint to the dynamic posture and imbues the figure with a concentrated human presence. Within the broader art historical context of the figurative traditions of the Benue region, and subject to its cultural attribution, the object can be considered a remarkable example of linear, spatially open metal sculpture. Its particular significance lies in the independent transformation of human anatomy into an abstract, movement-oriented formal language. The sculpture impressively demonstrates how few sculptural elements can suffice to create a human figure of great expressiveness and spatial presence.
Literature
Frank Herreman (ed.): Mumuye: Sculpture from Nigeria – The Human Figure Reinvented. Brussels: Mercatorfonds, 2016.
Marla C. Berns, Richard Fardon, and Sidney Littlefield Kasfir (eds.): Central Nigeria Unmasked: Arts of the Benue River Valley. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum at UCLA, 2011.
The publications mentioned above serve as a general art historical context for the figurative traditions of the Mumuye and the Benue region. A reliable literature reference directly related to this specific type of anthropomorphic iron sculpture is not currently available.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ32120
Informant: Amadou Dogo
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Mumuye
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Black Iron
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A iron sculpture
Height
58 cm
Weight
4.5 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
