A wooden sculpture - Togo (No reserve price)
04
days
14
hours
56
minutes
38
seconds
Current bid
€ 4
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 330
 | €4 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €3 | |
| €2 |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 143856 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
Pair of Losso wooden sculptures from Siou village, Niamtougou Region, Northern Togo, attributed to Losso (Nawdba) and dating undetermined, carved wood with a dark patina, supplied with a modern display stand, height 20 cm, weight 690 g, in fair condition and authentic/original.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Pair of Losso Wooden Sculptures – Stylized Anthropomorphic Figures
Losso (Nawdba), attributed
Siou Village, Niamtougou Region, Northern Togo
Material: Carved wood with dark brown patina, surface wear and incised decoration
Dating: Undetermined, possibly 20th century
Cultural Attribution: Losso, according to the informant
Function: Undetermined; possibly associated with ancestral or protective practices
Description
This remarkable pair of wooden sculptures represents two highly stylized anthropomorphic figures characterized by elongated cylindrical bodies, compact rounded heads, and a distinctive reduction of human anatomy to elementary geometric forms. Their closely related proportions and decorative details suggest a shared sculptural conception, possibly originating from the same workshop or individual carver.
Both figures possess horizontally expanded, rounded heads resembling flattened domes. The upper surfaces are decorated with short incised lines, while small projecting elements and shallow grooves suggest highly abbreviated facial features. The heads rest upon long, cylindrical sections that may represent elongated necks or an intentional extension of the upper body. This unusual arrangement creates a strong vertical emphasis and gives the sculptures an almost architectural appearance.
The central portions of the figures are comparatively broad and display a series of incised geometric patterns. Small rounded projections emerge from the frontal surfaces, possibly indicating breasts, anatomical details, or symbolic attributes. Their exact significance cannot be determined with certainty. Prominent rectangular projections extend from one side of each body, suggesting highly abstracted arms or other structural elements. These projections are particularly distinctive because they interrupt the otherwise cylindrical silhouettes.
The lower sections terminate in two short, substantial supports separated by a central opening. These elements may represent legs, although their block-like construction makes anatomical interpretation secondary to the overall sculptural design. The figures are mounted on modern black display bases, which are not original components.
The surfaces exhibit dark brown coloration with lighter areas of abrasion, particularly along projecting edges and incised details. Numerous scratches, shallow grooves, and irregular patches of discoloration contribute to the sculptures' textured appearance. Their surfaces suggest handling and environmental exposure, although neither age nor ritual use can be established from these characteristics alone.
Despite minor differences in proportions and decoration, the two sculptures form a visually coherent ensemble. Their repeated structural elements create a deliberate rhythm, while subtle variations preserve the individuality of each figure.
Art-Historical Context
The sculptures are attributed to the Losso, also known as the Nawdba, an ethnolinguistic community inhabiting parts of northern Togo, particularly the area surrounding Niamtougou. The Losso cultural region belongs to a broader landscape of closely interacting communities, including the Lamba, Kabyè, and other populations of the northern Togolese highlands.
Wooden sculpture in this region is characterized by considerable formal diversity, ranging from comparatively naturalistic anthropomorphic representations to highly abstract, columnar figures. The artistic traditions of the Losso and neighboring communities have historically been associated with family shrines, ancestral relationships, and practices involving protective or spiritual forces.
The present sculptures display several characteristics consistent with the broader vocabulary of northern Togolese figurative carving. Their cylindrical bodies, simplified anatomical features, and pronounced geometric organization emphasize the essential structure of the human figure rather than naturalistic representation.
Particularly striking is the unusual relationship between the rounded heads and elongated neck-like sections. Such extreme vertical abstraction distinguishes these objects from more conventional anthropomorphic sculptures and suggests a local artistic interpretation within the wider regional tradition.
The attribution to Siou village is especially relevant. Siou lies within the Niamtougou area and is associated with the Nawdm-speaking cultural environment. Nevertheless, individual workshops and sculptural styles within this region have not always been systematically documented. The supplied village attribution should therefore be preserved without assuming that the figures represent a securely established Siou sculptural subtype.
Symbolism and Possible Ritual Function
The sculptures' highly abstracted human forms invite consideration of their possible relationship to ancestral representation and protective ritual practices. In several northern Togolese communities, carved wooden figures have served as material supports for relationships between living families, deceased relatives, and spiritual forces.
Such figures do not necessarily function as portraits in the Western sense. Their significance may derive instead from ritual consecration, inherited associations, or their placement within particular domestic and communal settings.
The present sculptures' strongly vertical organization could suggest permanence and stability, while the compact heads and abbreviated limbs emphasize an intentional reduction of the human body. However, these formal characteristics cannot independently establish a particular religious meaning.
The small rounded projections on the torsos may represent anatomical features, but their symbolic significance remains uncertain. Similarly, the rectangular lateral elements could indicate arms or attributes associated with the represented figures.
The apparent pairing is another potentially meaningful characteristic. In certain African sculptural traditions, paired figures express complementary relationships, family continuity, or the association of distinct spiritual presences. Nevertheless, no documented ritual context confirms that the present sculptures were originally conceived as a complementary pair.
Their close stylistic correspondence makes such an association plausible, but the possibility that they were brought together at a later stage cannot be excluded.
Without information concerning their original location, ownership, or ritual treatment, a more precise functional interpretation would be speculative.
Regional Characteristics: Siou and the Niamtougou Area
The Niamtougou region of northern Togo occupies an important position within the cultural geography of the Kara area. Its landscape of hills, cultivated valleys, and dispersed settlements has historically supported communities whose social and religious practices are closely connected with lineage organization, agricultural life, and ancestral relationships.
Siou is particularly associated with the Losso or Nawdba cultural sphere. The wider region is characterized by longstanding interactions between neighboring populations, making rigid stylistic boundaries difficult to establish.
Traditional wooden sculpture in northern Togo frequently reflects the importance of local ritual practices rather than the requirements of centralized political institutions. Objects may be produced for individual families, lineage shrines, or particular spiritual purposes, and their forms can vary considerably between neighboring settlements.
In this context, the present figures' simplified bodies and carefully organized geometric decoration are especially interesting. Their elongated cylindrical sections create a strong formal continuity between head and torso, while the incised markings introduce a restrained decorative vocabulary.
The short, block-like lower supports distinguish these sculptures from standing figures with fully articulated legs. Their compact construction may have facilitated placement on a shrine or another supporting surface, although this remains hypothetical.
The reported origin in Siou offers a valuable geographical point of reference. It also encourages comparison with the sculptural traditions of neighboring Lamba and Kabyè communities, whose artistic production forms part of the same interconnected northern Togolese environment.
Nevertheless, regional proximity should not be mistaken for cultural identity. The sculptures' specific classification must remain dependent upon documented provenance and comparative examples.
Art-Historical Appreciation
The artistic distinction of this pair lies in the radical simplification of the human figure and the disciplined repetition of geometric forms. The sculptor has transformed the body into a sequence of cylindrical and rectangular volumes, producing a composition of remarkable clarity.
The horizontally expanded heads provide a visual counterweight to the elongated vertical bodies. Their rounded contours contrast with the angular lateral projections and block-like lower supports, creating a carefully balanced relationship between curved and straight forms.
The incised decoration contributes significantly to the sculptures' expressive character. Rather than covering the surfaces with elaborate ornament, the carver has employed restrained geometric markings that emphasize particular anatomical or structural areas.
The dark, worn surfaces enhance the visual effect of these details, allowing the lighter incisions and abraded edges to emerge against the deeper brown wood.
Viewed together, the figures establish a compelling sculptural dialogue. Their similarities suggest a common artistic vocabulary, while differences in their proportions and surface treatment introduce a sense of individuality.
The pair represents an intriguing example of the abstract figurative traditions associated with northern Togo. Its unusual proportions, distinctive cylindrical construction, and reported origin in Siou make it particularly relevant for comparative study of Losso sculpture.
Although its precise function and historical date remain uncertain, the ensemble demonstrates the expressive possibilities of highly reduced anthropomorphic representation within the artistic environment of the Niamtougou region.
Selected Literature
Amrouche, Pierre. Corps & décors: Statuaire Lamba et Losso du Togo. 2008. A particularly relevant comparative reference for the sculptural traditions of the Lamba and Losso of northern Togo, including their distinctive treatment of the human figure.
Froelich, Jean-Claude, Pierre Alexandre, and Robert Cornevin. Les populations du Nord-Togo. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963. An important ethnographic study of the communities of northern Togo, providing historical and cultural context for the Losso and neighboring populations.
Spieth, Jakob. Die Ewe-Stämme: Material zur Kunde des Ewe-Volkes in Deutsch-Togo. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 1906. A historical ethnographic work concerning southern Togo; geographically less relevant to the present sculptures and not a direct reference for Losso statuary.
The study by Pierre Amrouche is the most directly relevant art-historical comparison for the present objects. The ethnographic publication by Froelich, Alexandre, and Cornevin provides important regional context. Neither establishes the precise function or dating of this particular pair.
Informant: Ouro
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ32524
Height: 20 cm / 20 cm
Weight: 320 g / 370 g (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Pair of Losso Wooden Sculptures – Stylized Anthropomorphic Figures
Losso (Nawdba), attributed
Siou Village, Niamtougou Region, Northern Togo
Material: Carved wood with dark brown patina, surface wear and incised decoration
Dating: Undetermined, possibly 20th century
Cultural Attribution: Losso, according to the informant
Function: Undetermined; possibly associated with ancestral or protective practices
Description
This remarkable pair of wooden sculptures represents two highly stylized anthropomorphic figures characterized by elongated cylindrical bodies, compact rounded heads, and a distinctive reduction of human anatomy to elementary geometric forms. Their closely related proportions and decorative details suggest a shared sculptural conception, possibly originating from the same workshop or individual carver.
Both figures possess horizontally expanded, rounded heads resembling flattened domes. The upper surfaces are decorated with short incised lines, while small projecting elements and shallow grooves suggest highly abbreviated facial features. The heads rest upon long, cylindrical sections that may represent elongated necks or an intentional extension of the upper body. This unusual arrangement creates a strong vertical emphasis and gives the sculptures an almost architectural appearance.
The central portions of the figures are comparatively broad and display a series of incised geometric patterns. Small rounded projections emerge from the frontal surfaces, possibly indicating breasts, anatomical details, or symbolic attributes. Their exact significance cannot be determined with certainty. Prominent rectangular projections extend from one side of each body, suggesting highly abstracted arms or other structural elements. These projections are particularly distinctive because they interrupt the otherwise cylindrical silhouettes.
The lower sections terminate in two short, substantial supports separated by a central opening. These elements may represent legs, although their block-like construction makes anatomical interpretation secondary to the overall sculptural design. The figures are mounted on modern black display bases, which are not original components.
The surfaces exhibit dark brown coloration with lighter areas of abrasion, particularly along projecting edges and incised details. Numerous scratches, shallow grooves, and irregular patches of discoloration contribute to the sculptures' textured appearance. Their surfaces suggest handling and environmental exposure, although neither age nor ritual use can be established from these characteristics alone.
Despite minor differences in proportions and decoration, the two sculptures form a visually coherent ensemble. Their repeated structural elements create a deliberate rhythm, while subtle variations preserve the individuality of each figure.
Art-Historical Context
The sculptures are attributed to the Losso, also known as the Nawdba, an ethnolinguistic community inhabiting parts of northern Togo, particularly the area surrounding Niamtougou. The Losso cultural region belongs to a broader landscape of closely interacting communities, including the Lamba, Kabyè, and other populations of the northern Togolese highlands.
Wooden sculpture in this region is characterized by considerable formal diversity, ranging from comparatively naturalistic anthropomorphic representations to highly abstract, columnar figures. The artistic traditions of the Losso and neighboring communities have historically been associated with family shrines, ancestral relationships, and practices involving protective or spiritual forces.
The present sculptures display several characteristics consistent with the broader vocabulary of northern Togolese figurative carving. Their cylindrical bodies, simplified anatomical features, and pronounced geometric organization emphasize the essential structure of the human figure rather than naturalistic representation.
Particularly striking is the unusual relationship between the rounded heads and elongated neck-like sections. Such extreme vertical abstraction distinguishes these objects from more conventional anthropomorphic sculptures and suggests a local artistic interpretation within the wider regional tradition.
The attribution to Siou village is especially relevant. Siou lies within the Niamtougou area and is associated with the Nawdm-speaking cultural environment. Nevertheless, individual workshops and sculptural styles within this region have not always been systematically documented. The supplied village attribution should therefore be preserved without assuming that the figures represent a securely established Siou sculptural subtype.
Symbolism and Possible Ritual Function
The sculptures' highly abstracted human forms invite consideration of their possible relationship to ancestral representation and protective ritual practices. In several northern Togolese communities, carved wooden figures have served as material supports for relationships between living families, deceased relatives, and spiritual forces.
Such figures do not necessarily function as portraits in the Western sense. Their significance may derive instead from ritual consecration, inherited associations, or their placement within particular domestic and communal settings.
The present sculptures' strongly vertical organization could suggest permanence and stability, while the compact heads and abbreviated limbs emphasize an intentional reduction of the human body. However, these formal characteristics cannot independently establish a particular religious meaning.
The small rounded projections on the torsos may represent anatomical features, but their symbolic significance remains uncertain. Similarly, the rectangular lateral elements could indicate arms or attributes associated with the represented figures.
The apparent pairing is another potentially meaningful characteristic. In certain African sculptural traditions, paired figures express complementary relationships, family continuity, or the association of distinct spiritual presences. Nevertheless, no documented ritual context confirms that the present sculptures were originally conceived as a complementary pair.
Their close stylistic correspondence makes such an association plausible, but the possibility that they were brought together at a later stage cannot be excluded.
Without information concerning their original location, ownership, or ritual treatment, a more precise functional interpretation would be speculative.
Regional Characteristics: Siou and the Niamtougou Area
The Niamtougou region of northern Togo occupies an important position within the cultural geography of the Kara area. Its landscape of hills, cultivated valleys, and dispersed settlements has historically supported communities whose social and religious practices are closely connected with lineage organization, agricultural life, and ancestral relationships.
Siou is particularly associated with the Losso or Nawdba cultural sphere. The wider region is characterized by longstanding interactions between neighboring populations, making rigid stylistic boundaries difficult to establish.
Traditional wooden sculpture in northern Togo frequently reflects the importance of local ritual practices rather than the requirements of centralized political institutions. Objects may be produced for individual families, lineage shrines, or particular spiritual purposes, and their forms can vary considerably between neighboring settlements.
In this context, the present figures' simplified bodies and carefully organized geometric decoration are especially interesting. Their elongated cylindrical sections create a strong formal continuity between head and torso, while the incised markings introduce a restrained decorative vocabulary.
The short, block-like lower supports distinguish these sculptures from standing figures with fully articulated legs. Their compact construction may have facilitated placement on a shrine or another supporting surface, although this remains hypothetical.
The reported origin in Siou offers a valuable geographical point of reference. It also encourages comparison with the sculptural traditions of neighboring Lamba and Kabyè communities, whose artistic production forms part of the same interconnected northern Togolese environment.
Nevertheless, regional proximity should not be mistaken for cultural identity. The sculptures' specific classification must remain dependent upon documented provenance and comparative examples.
Art-Historical Appreciation
The artistic distinction of this pair lies in the radical simplification of the human figure and the disciplined repetition of geometric forms. The sculptor has transformed the body into a sequence of cylindrical and rectangular volumes, producing a composition of remarkable clarity.
The horizontally expanded heads provide a visual counterweight to the elongated vertical bodies. Their rounded contours contrast with the angular lateral projections and block-like lower supports, creating a carefully balanced relationship between curved and straight forms.
The incised decoration contributes significantly to the sculptures' expressive character. Rather than covering the surfaces with elaborate ornament, the carver has employed restrained geometric markings that emphasize particular anatomical or structural areas.
The dark, worn surfaces enhance the visual effect of these details, allowing the lighter incisions and abraded edges to emerge against the deeper brown wood.
Viewed together, the figures establish a compelling sculptural dialogue. Their similarities suggest a common artistic vocabulary, while differences in their proportions and surface treatment introduce a sense of individuality.
The pair represents an intriguing example of the abstract figurative traditions associated with northern Togo. Its unusual proportions, distinctive cylindrical construction, and reported origin in Siou make it particularly relevant for comparative study of Losso sculpture.
Although its precise function and historical date remain uncertain, the ensemble demonstrates the expressive possibilities of highly reduced anthropomorphic representation within the artistic environment of the Niamtougou region.
Selected Literature
Amrouche, Pierre. Corps & décors: Statuaire Lamba et Losso du Togo. 2008. A particularly relevant comparative reference for the sculptural traditions of the Lamba and Losso of northern Togo, including their distinctive treatment of the human figure.
Froelich, Jean-Claude, Pierre Alexandre, and Robert Cornevin. Les populations du Nord-Togo. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963. An important ethnographic study of the communities of northern Togo, providing historical and cultural context for the Losso and neighboring populations.
Spieth, Jakob. Die Ewe-Stämme: Material zur Kunde des Ewe-Volkes in Deutsch-Togo. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 1906. A historical ethnographic work concerning southern Togo; geographically less relevant to the present sculptures and not a direct reference for Losso statuary.
The study by Pierre Amrouche is the most directly relevant art-historical comparison for the present objects. The ethnographic publication by Froelich, Alexandre, and Cornevin provides important regional context. Neither establishes the precise function or dating of this particular pair.
Informant: Ouro
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.
Inv. No. MAZ32524
Height: 20 cm / 20 cm
Weight: 320 g / 370 g (incl. stand)
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Country of Origin
Togo
Material
Wood
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A wooden sculpture
Height
20 cm
Weight
690 g
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
