A iron sculpture - Lobi - Burkina Faso (No reserve price)

03
days
05
hours
43
minutes
45
seconds
Current bid
€ 5
No reserve price
Dimitri André
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André

Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.

Estimate  € 210 - € 250
DE
€5
FR
€4
DE
€3

Catawiki Buyer Protection

Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details

Trustpilot 4.4 | 143966 reviews

Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.

Original, official iron sculpture titled 'A iron sculpture' from Burkina Faso's Kampti region, attributed to the Lobi culture, mounted on a wooden base with stand, with a height of 47 cm and a weight of 190 g, in fair condition.

AI-assisted summary

Description from the seller

Zoomorphic sculpture made of lobi iron

Origin: Kampti region, in southwestern Burkina Faso.

Material: black iron, wooden base, incl stand

Description

The sculpture depicts a four-legged animal with a very elongated body, positioned almost horizontally. The small, slightly bulging head extends directly into a narrow neck. Two slender, arched front limbs slope diagonally toward the ground; at the rear, two other limbs form more pronounced curves. The hindquarters curve backward in a supple motion reminiscent of a curled tail. The figure as a whole resembles a lizard, a monitor lizard, or possibly a chameleon, but the species cannot be identified with certainty. For comparison, the Brooklyn Museum holds a wooden Lobi chameleon figure dating from the late 19th or early 20th century, attesting to the presence of this animal motif in Lobi art. The modeling is reduced to a few essential lines. The head bears faint indications of a mouth and perhaps an eye, while the body forms a flattened, irregular strip. The limbs are rendered as curved rods, creating large empty spaces. The surface is no longer truly black: it exhibits reddish-brown corrosion, pitting, and oxidation crusts. These marks provide insight into the metal's deterioration but do not prove either the object's age or its ancient ritual use. The black rectangular base and its fasteners clearly belong to a modern display mount.

Historical and Artistic Analysis

The piece's visual appeal lies in its balance between horizontality and tension. The long back forms a continuous line, while the arched legs seem to suspend the animal above the ground. The negative space thus becomes a compositional element as important as the metal itself. This construction emphasizes silhouette, rhythm, and the idea of movement rather than naturalism. Viewed in profile, the figure appears to be crawling, leaping, or standing in a state of alert. Its abstraction likely results from the forging process: one or more iron bars may have been heated, hammered, stretched, bent, and then possibly assembled. An X-ray, microscopic examination of the joints, and metallographic analysis would be necessary to distinguish between forged parts, welds, repairs, and losses due to corrosion. The heavy oxidation alone does not allow us to conclude that the figure was displayed on an altar for a long period. A comparison with Lobi iron figures held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum confirms the existence of figurative metalwork in the Lobi region. However, this animal-like form must be distinguished from the anthropomorphic wooden bateba, which are much better documented. Daniela Bognolo demonstrates that the objects grouped under the term "Lobi" belong to a heterogeneous cultural and stylistic ensemble, in which the form of a ritual object depends on the religious power in question, the local group, the lineage, and sometimes the identity of the artist. It would therefore be unwise to ascribe a fixed and universal meaning to this figure.

Possible Ritual Function

In Lobi religious beliefs, the thila—invisible, protective powers—can manifest their will through illnesses, dreams, accidents, or other unusual events. Their message is interpreted by a divination specialist. Domestic or lineage altars may contain vessels, human or animal figures, and various consecrated substances. Klaus Schneider emphasizes that there is no single classification of thila valid for the entire Lobi region: the rules, taboos, and associated objects vary by region, family, and situation. In this context, an iron animal figure could potentially serve as a material vessel for a power, an altar guardian, or a protective instrument commissioned following a divination consultation. The reptile—an animal close to the ground and capable of moving between different environments—may suggest vigilance, adaptation, or the crossing of boundaries. This interpretation, however, remains comparative and should not be presented as a certainty.

Historical and Artistic Assessment

Despite its small scale and the economy of its materials, the work possesses a strong presence. The blacksmith transforms a heavy material into an almost graphic creature, composed of lines, curves, and negative space. Its historical and artistic value lies less in zoological accuracy than in its ability to convey the animal's vigilance, mobility, and power. Documented provenance and technical analyses would remain essential before any definitive attribution.

Selected Bibliography

Labouret, Henri. The Tribes of the Lobi Branch (Middle Black Volta, West Africa). Paris, Institute of Ethnology, 1931.

Meyer, Piet. Art and Religion of the Lobi. Zurich, Museum Rietberg, 1981.

Père, Madeleine. The Lobi: Tradition and Change: Burkina Faso. Laval, Siloë, 1988, 2 volumes.

Schneider, Klaus. Craft and Material Culture of the Lobi in Burkina Faso. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1990.

Bognolo, Daniela. Lobi. Milan, 5 Continents Éditions, 2007.

The publications mentioned serve for comparative art historical classification. They do not establish the specific cultural attribution, dating, or original use of the sculpture in question.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ32789

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

Zoomorphic sculpture made of lobi iron

Origin: Kampti region, in southwestern Burkina Faso.

Material: black iron, wooden base, incl stand

Description

The sculpture depicts a four-legged animal with a very elongated body, positioned almost horizontally. The small, slightly bulging head extends directly into a narrow neck. Two slender, arched front limbs slope diagonally toward the ground; at the rear, two other limbs form more pronounced curves. The hindquarters curve backward in a supple motion reminiscent of a curled tail. The figure as a whole resembles a lizard, a monitor lizard, or possibly a chameleon, but the species cannot be identified with certainty. For comparison, the Brooklyn Museum holds a wooden Lobi chameleon figure dating from the late 19th or early 20th century, attesting to the presence of this animal motif in Lobi art. The modeling is reduced to a few essential lines. The head bears faint indications of a mouth and perhaps an eye, while the body forms a flattened, irregular strip. The limbs are rendered as curved rods, creating large empty spaces. The surface is no longer truly black: it exhibits reddish-brown corrosion, pitting, and oxidation crusts. These marks provide insight into the metal's deterioration but do not prove either the object's age or its ancient ritual use. The black rectangular base and its fasteners clearly belong to a modern display mount.

Historical and Artistic Analysis

The piece's visual appeal lies in its balance between horizontality and tension. The long back forms a continuous line, while the arched legs seem to suspend the animal above the ground. The negative space thus becomes a compositional element as important as the metal itself. This construction emphasizes silhouette, rhythm, and the idea of movement rather than naturalism. Viewed in profile, the figure appears to be crawling, leaping, or standing in a state of alert. Its abstraction likely results from the forging process: one or more iron bars may have been heated, hammered, stretched, bent, and then possibly assembled. An X-ray, microscopic examination of the joints, and metallographic analysis would be necessary to distinguish between forged parts, welds, repairs, and losses due to corrosion. The heavy oxidation alone does not allow us to conclude that the figure was displayed on an altar for a long period. A comparison with Lobi iron figures held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum confirms the existence of figurative metalwork in the Lobi region. However, this animal-like form must be distinguished from the anthropomorphic wooden bateba, which are much better documented. Daniela Bognolo demonstrates that the objects grouped under the term "Lobi" belong to a heterogeneous cultural and stylistic ensemble, in which the form of a ritual object depends on the religious power in question, the local group, the lineage, and sometimes the identity of the artist. It would therefore be unwise to ascribe a fixed and universal meaning to this figure.

Possible Ritual Function

In Lobi religious beliefs, the thila—invisible, protective powers—can manifest their will through illnesses, dreams, accidents, or other unusual events. Their message is interpreted by a divination specialist. Domestic or lineage altars may contain vessels, human or animal figures, and various consecrated substances. Klaus Schneider emphasizes that there is no single classification of thila valid for the entire Lobi region: the rules, taboos, and associated objects vary by region, family, and situation. In this context, an iron animal figure could potentially serve as a material vessel for a power, an altar guardian, or a protective instrument commissioned following a divination consultation. The reptile—an animal close to the ground and capable of moving between different environments—may suggest vigilance, adaptation, or the crossing of boundaries. This interpretation, however, remains comparative and should not be presented as a certainty.

Historical and Artistic Assessment

Despite its small scale and the economy of its materials, the work possesses a strong presence. The blacksmith transforms a heavy material into an almost graphic creature, composed of lines, curves, and negative space. Its historical and artistic value lies less in zoological accuracy than in its ability to convey the animal's vigilance, mobility, and power. Documented provenance and technical analyses would remain essential before any definitive attribution.

Selected Bibliography

Labouret, Henri. The Tribes of the Lobi Branch (Middle Black Volta, West Africa). Paris, Institute of Ethnology, 1931.

Meyer, Piet. Art and Religion of the Lobi. Zurich, Museum Rietberg, 1981.

Père, Madeleine. The Lobi: Tradition and Change: Burkina Faso. Laval, Siloë, 1988, 2 volumes.

Schneider, Klaus. Craft and Material Culture of the Lobi in Burkina Faso. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1990.

Bognolo, Daniela. Lobi. Milan, 5 Continents Éditions, 2007.

The publications mentioned serve for comparative art historical classification. They do not establish the specific cultural attribution, dating, or original use of the sculpture in question.

Copyright and Scientific Documentation

Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective copyright holders are reserved.

Inv. No. MAZ32789

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

Details

Ethnic group/ culture
Lobi
Country of Origin
Burkina Faso
Material
Black Iron
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A iron sculpture
Height
47 cm
Weight
190 g
Authenticity
Original/official
GermanyVerified
6937
Objects sold
99.43%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

Similar objects

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​

For you in

African & Tribal Art

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​