A iron sculpture - Mumuye - Nigeria (No reserve price)
00
days
17
hours
59
minutes
13
seconds
Current bid
€ 50
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 280 - € 350
 | €50 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €47 | |
| €44 | |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 145414 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
“A iron sculpture” is an original black iron Mumuye figure from Nigeria, 55 cm high and weighing 2.5 kg, sold with a stand.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Anthropomorphic Iron Figure of the Mumuye
Nigeria, Upper Benue region, culturally attributed to the Mumuye
Material: Iron, hand-forged from a single piece, without welded joints, incl. stand
Surface: Brown to dark brown oxidized iron with lighter surface deposits
Dimension: Height: 55 cm, Weight: 2,5 kg
Inv. No. MAZ34319
Description
This exceptional Mumuye iron figure is distinguished by its radical reduction of the human body to a few elongated lines and its remarkable spatial presence. The upright figure rises from two widely spaced, slightly bent legs enclosing a tall, arch-shaped opening. The feet have been hammered into flattened surfaces. Above the junction of the legs, a slender, almost rod-like torso extends upward, with two long arms descending on either side of its upper section. Following different curves along the vertical axis of the body, the arms terminate in small, rounded, flattened hands. The highly abstracted head features two laterally projecting, leaf-shaped extensions reminiscent of the characteristic ear or coiffure forms found in Mumuye sculpture. Facial features are barely articulated. The composition derives its expressive power from the interplay between forged iron and the generous open spaces separating the arms, torso, and legs. Dark brown areas of corrosion, ochre-colored oxidation, and lighter surface deposits give the metal a richly varied and irregular texture.
Forged from a Single Piece of Iron
The most remarkable feature of this figure is its sophisticated forging technique. According to the available information, the entire sculpture was created from a single piece of iron, without welding, riveting, or otherwise joining separate components. What initially appears to be an assemblage of several slender iron rods is therefore the result of an exceptionally demanding process of plastic deformation.
The traditional production of such a figure required extraordinary mastery of fire, temperature, and material. In a charcoal-fired forge, the iron was repeatedly heated until it became sufficiently malleable to be shaped by hammering. Working on an anvil, the blacksmith could gradually transform the initially compact iron blank into a human figure through carefully controlled drawing out, upsetting, flattening, and bending.
One of the essential techniques involved splitting the heated iron with a sharp forging chisel. By making longitudinal cuts, the smith could create several branching elements from a single continuous mass of metal. It is technically conceivable that the two legs were formed by splitting the lower section of the original blank, spreading the resulting branches apart, and hammering them into their elongated shapes. Similar operations may have produced the arms and the projections of the head. The precise sequence of these procedures, however, cannot be established with certainty from the finished object.
Particularly challenging was the formation of the slender limbs without weakening or damaging the iron where they emerge from the torso. Every hammer blow had to take into account the thickness of the material, its temperature, and the intended proportions. While the arms were drawn out into long, narrow extensions, their ends were selectively flattened and widened to suggest hands. The widely spreading legs and flattened feet likewise required precise control over the distribution of the available metal. Throughout the process, the workpiece had to be repeatedly reheated, turned, repositioned on the anvil, and worked in individual sections. The central technical challenge lay in developing a complex, spatially articulated figure from a limited quantity of iron without adding any separate metal components.
Art Historical Context
The Mumuye inhabit the Upper Benue region of northeastern Nigeria, particularly the present-day state of Taraba. Their figurative art represents one of the most distinctive sculptural traditions of central Nigeria. They are especially renowned for their highly abstract wooden figures, characterized by slender bodies, arms projecting away from the torso, unusually shaped heads, and dynamically bent legs.
The present iron figure incorporates essential characteristics of this sculptural tradition while translating them into an almost linear structure in metal. The human body is conceived not as a closed volume but as a rhythmic arrangement of vertical, curved, and angular elements. The enclosed negative space is as significant as the iron itself. In particular, the widely opened legs lend the figure a monumental presence independent of its actual dimensions. The descending arms and leaf-shaped projections of the head establish a visual connection with traditional Mumuye iconography. At the same time, the sculpture demonstrates how an established figurative concept could be adapted to the technical possibilities of a different material. From a contemporary perspective, its formal audacity recalls certain principles of modern abstract sculpture, yet it must be understood within its own African artistic and craftsmanship traditions.
Cultural Background and Possible Ritual Function
Figurative sculptures among the Mumuye could fulfill a variety of social and religious functions. Ethnographic studies describe their use in connection with protective practices, the authority of prominent individuals, divination, healing, and relationships with the ancestral world. Not every figure served the same purpose, and individual objects could be employed in different contexts. Iron also possessed significance beyond its practical applications in numerous societies of central Nigeria. The production of tools, weapons, and ritual objects required specialized knowledge, which could confer a particular social standing upon blacksmiths. However, no specific original function has been documented for the present iron figure. A ritual purpose is conceivable within its broader cultural context but cannot be regarded as established without further provenance or ethnographic information.
An Endangered Craft Tradition
The creation of a multi-limbed human figure from a single piece of iron presupposes a body of practical knowledge developed and transmitted over generations. With the spread of industrially manufactured metal products, changing economic conditions, and the decline of traditional commissions and ritual practices, numerous historical forging techniques in Africa have diminished in importance. The production of elaborate figurative ironwork, in particular, requires an intimate understanding of the material and of the effects of heat and hammering, acquired through years of experience. The continued transmission of such skills can no longer be taken for granted. The present figure should therefore be appreciated not only as an independent artistic creation but also as a testament to a highly sophisticated metalworking tradition whose survival is increasingly uncertain. The extraordinary technical achievement of the blacksmith remains immediately apparent in the seemingly effortless lightness of its open, delicate form.
Literature
Herreman, Frank, with contributions by Constantine Petridis: Mumuye: Sculpture from Nigeria – The Human Figure Reinvented. 2016.
Strybol, Jan: Central Nigerian Art Revisited: Mumuye and Surrounding Peoples. Stichting Kunstboek, 2023.
The publications listed above provide general art-historical and cultural context. They do not establish that the present figure has been specifically published or documented.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Anthropomorphic Iron Figure of the Mumuye
Nigeria, Upper Benue region, culturally attributed to the Mumuye
Material: Iron, hand-forged from a single piece, without welded joints, incl. stand
Surface: Brown to dark brown oxidized iron with lighter surface deposits
Dimension: Height: 55 cm, Weight: 2,5 kg
Inv. No. MAZ34319
Description
This exceptional Mumuye iron figure is distinguished by its radical reduction of the human body to a few elongated lines and its remarkable spatial presence. The upright figure rises from two widely spaced, slightly bent legs enclosing a tall, arch-shaped opening. The feet have been hammered into flattened surfaces. Above the junction of the legs, a slender, almost rod-like torso extends upward, with two long arms descending on either side of its upper section. Following different curves along the vertical axis of the body, the arms terminate in small, rounded, flattened hands. The highly abstracted head features two laterally projecting, leaf-shaped extensions reminiscent of the characteristic ear or coiffure forms found in Mumuye sculpture. Facial features are barely articulated. The composition derives its expressive power from the interplay between forged iron and the generous open spaces separating the arms, torso, and legs. Dark brown areas of corrosion, ochre-colored oxidation, and lighter surface deposits give the metal a richly varied and irregular texture.
Forged from a Single Piece of Iron
The most remarkable feature of this figure is its sophisticated forging technique. According to the available information, the entire sculpture was created from a single piece of iron, without welding, riveting, or otherwise joining separate components. What initially appears to be an assemblage of several slender iron rods is therefore the result of an exceptionally demanding process of plastic deformation.
The traditional production of such a figure required extraordinary mastery of fire, temperature, and material. In a charcoal-fired forge, the iron was repeatedly heated until it became sufficiently malleable to be shaped by hammering. Working on an anvil, the blacksmith could gradually transform the initially compact iron blank into a human figure through carefully controlled drawing out, upsetting, flattening, and bending.
One of the essential techniques involved splitting the heated iron with a sharp forging chisel. By making longitudinal cuts, the smith could create several branching elements from a single continuous mass of metal. It is technically conceivable that the two legs were formed by splitting the lower section of the original blank, spreading the resulting branches apart, and hammering them into their elongated shapes. Similar operations may have produced the arms and the projections of the head. The precise sequence of these procedures, however, cannot be established with certainty from the finished object.
Particularly challenging was the formation of the slender limbs without weakening or damaging the iron where they emerge from the torso. Every hammer blow had to take into account the thickness of the material, its temperature, and the intended proportions. While the arms were drawn out into long, narrow extensions, their ends were selectively flattened and widened to suggest hands. The widely spreading legs and flattened feet likewise required precise control over the distribution of the available metal. Throughout the process, the workpiece had to be repeatedly reheated, turned, repositioned on the anvil, and worked in individual sections. The central technical challenge lay in developing a complex, spatially articulated figure from a limited quantity of iron without adding any separate metal components.
Art Historical Context
The Mumuye inhabit the Upper Benue region of northeastern Nigeria, particularly the present-day state of Taraba. Their figurative art represents one of the most distinctive sculptural traditions of central Nigeria. They are especially renowned for their highly abstract wooden figures, characterized by slender bodies, arms projecting away from the torso, unusually shaped heads, and dynamically bent legs.
The present iron figure incorporates essential characteristics of this sculptural tradition while translating them into an almost linear structure in metal. The human body is conceived not as a closed volume but as a rhythmic arrangement of vertical, curved, and angular elements. The enclosed negative space is as significant as the iron itself. In particular, the widely opened legs lend the figure a monumental presence independent of its actual dimensions. The descending arms and leaf-shaped projections of the head establish a visual connection with traditional Mumuye iconography. At the same time, the sculpture demonstrates how an established figurative concept could be adapted to the technical possibilities of a different material. From a contemporary perspective, its formal audacity recalls certain principles of modern abstract sculpture, yet it must be understood within its own African artistic and craftsmanship traditions.
Cultural Background and Possible Ritual Function
Figurative sculptures among the Mumuye could fulfill a variety of social and religious functions. Ethnographic studies describe their use in connection with protective practices, the authority of prominent individuals, divination, healing, and relationships with the ancestral world. Not every figure served the same purpose, and individual objects could be employed in different contexts. Iron also possessed significance beyond its practical applications in numerous societies of central Nigeria. The production of tools, weapons, and ritual objects required specialized knowledge, which could confer a particular social standing upon blacksmiths. However, no specific original function has been documented for the present iron figure. A ritual purpose is conceivable within its broader cultural context but cannot be regarded as established without further provenance or ethnographic information.
An Endangered Craft Tradition
The creation of a multi-limbed human figure from a single piece of iron presupposes a body of practical knowledge developed and transmitted over generations. With the spread of industrially manufactured metal products, changing economic conditions, and the decline of traditional commissions and ritual practices, numerous historical forging techniques in Africa have diminished in importance. The production of elaborate figurative ironwork, in particular, requires an intimate understanding of the material and of the effects of heat and hammering, acquired through years of experience. The continued transmission of such skills can no longer be taken for granted. The present figure should therefore be appreciated not only as an independent artistic creation but also as a testament to a highly sophisticated metalworking tradition whose survival is increasingly uncertain. The extraordinary technical achievement of the blacksmith remains immediately apparent in the seemingly effortless lightness of its open, delicate form.
Literature
Herreman, Frank, with contributions by Constantine Petridis: Mumuye: Sculpture from Nigeria – The Human Figure Reinvented. 2016.
Strybol, Jan: Central Nigerian Art Revisited: Mumuye and Surrounding Peoples. Stichting Kunstboek, 2023.
The publications listed above provide general art-historical and cultural context. They do not establish that the present figure has been specifically published or documented.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Mumuye
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Black Iron
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A iron sculpture
Height
55 cm
Weight
2.5 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
