A bronze sculpture - Benin - Nigeria (No reserve price)
00
days
17
hours
38
minutes
16
seconds
Current bid
€ 40
No reserve price
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André
Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.
Estimate € 450 - € 550
 | €40 | |
|---|---|---|
 | €37 | |
| €32 | |
Catawiki Buyer Protection
Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details
Trustpilot 4.4 | 145414 reviews
Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.
A bronze fish-shaped container from Nigeria, attributed to Benin culture, is a reproduction measuring 24 cm long and 11 cm high, in fair condition, with no documented ownership history.
AI-assisted summary
Description from the seller
Fish-Shaped Kola Nut Container – Benin, Nigeria
Origin: Historical Kingdom of Benin, Benin City region, present-day Nigeria
Cultural attribution: Edo (Benin), stylistic attribution
Material: Cast copper alloy, traditionally referred to as bronze, with brown and partially greenish oxidation patina
Dimensions: Length 24 cm, height 11 cm
Weight: 660 g
Inventory number: MAZ22776
Dating: Not established
Provenance: No detailed information regarding the object's ownership history is documented
Description
This remarkable lidded container, entirely conceived in the form of a fish, combines the sculptural representation of an aquatic creature with the practical function of a receptacle for the storage and presentation of kola nuts. The elongated body displays a compact, gently curved silhouette, tapering towards a prominently developed, deeply forked tail fin. The broad, almost triangular head features two circular, protruding eyes and a pronounced, slightly open mouth with clearly modelled lips. A horizontal dividing line runs along the sides of the body, separating the sculpture into a lower container and a removable upper lid. The transition between the head and the body is accentuated by a curved, raised line. The dorsal surface is decorated with a carefully executed scale pattern consisting of overlapping semicircular lines and finely punched dotted fields. The lateral fins are comparatively small, while the tail fin displays a particularly differentiated structure created by closely spaced parallel incisions. A substantial, elegantly arched carrying handle rises from the back, accompanied by two smaller, hook-shaped projections. The original construction incorporated four slender supporting legs, of which three survive. The surface exhibits an irregular patina ranging predominantly from dark brown to ochre, with partially developed greenish oxidation. The combination of a cohesive sculptural form, refined ornamentation and functional construction suggests an object deliberately conceived as both a utilitarian vessel and an autonomous work of art.
Art Historical Context
In its form and iconography, the object belongs to the artistic tradition associated with the metalwork of the historical Kingdom of Benin, whose political and artistic centre was located in Benin City, in present-day southern Nigeria. The royal workshops of the Edo people, in particular, developed a highly sophisticated tradition of metal casting, producing objects that gave visual expression to political authority, religious concepts and social hierarchies. Specialist bronze casters were organised into guilds and traditionally worked in close association with the royal court. In addition to the celebrated relief plaques, commemorative heads and freestanding figures, elaborately designed vessels, boxes and ceremonial implements formed part of the repertoire of these workshops. Containers shaped as animals or plants constitute a particularly distinctive category, in which the external appearance could be directly related to the symbolic significance of the contents. The use of a copper alloy and the sophisticated surface decoration of the present fish-shaped container suggest a connection with this tradition of courtly craftsmanship. Comparable lidded vessels are documented in museum collections, including that of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Nevertheless, a definitive attribution of the present example to a historical royal workshop or a particular period of production cannot be established without additional provenance documentation and technical examination.
Symbolism and Iconography
Fish occupy an important symbolic position within the courtly imagery of Benin. The so-called mudfish, in particular, an aquatic creature associated with an amphibious existence, frequently appears in representations connected with the Oba, the King of Benin. Its ability to move between aquatic and terrestrial environments has been interpreted as a metaphor for royal authority, mediating between the human and spiritual realms. Fish imagery is also associated with Olokun, the Edo deity connected with water, the sea and wealth. Representations of fish therefore occur on royal metalwork, ornaments and ritual objects. The present fish sculpture may be considered within this iconographic framework, although its clearly articulated scales and forked tail do not permit a secure zoological identification as a mudfish. Particularly noteworthy is the complete transformation of the animal's body into a container: the sculpturally modelled mouth, prominent eyes and ornamentally structured flanks give the vessel a distinctive visual presence extending beyond its practical function. The combination of the fish form and its potentially valuable contents may evoke concepts of prosperity, protection and the symbolic relationship between water and royal authority. While such an interpretation is iconographically plausible, it cannot be regarded as a specifically documented meaning of this individual object.
Ritual and Social Function
Kola nuts possessed a significance within Benin society that extended far beyond their consumption as a stimulant. Their presentation constituted an expression of hospitality, mutual respect and social recognition. At the royal court and during ceremonial gatherings, they could be offered as symbols of political affiliation, social status or religious devotion. The opening, sharing and distribution of kola nuts were embedded in established forms of social interaction. Accordingly, elaborately fashioned containers made from wood, ivory and metal were produced, their artistic decoration emphasising the importance and value of the offering. In terms of both its construction and appearance, the present fish-shaped lidded vessel may be assigned to this category of objects. The curved handle facilitates the lifting of the lid, while the supporting legs elevate the container above the surface on which it stands. The object thus combines the functions of a storage vessel, a presentation container and a sculptural representation of symbolic significance. Whether this particular example was actually used at the court of an Oba, in the household of a high-ranking dignitary or within another ceremonial context cannot be determined in the absence of object-specific historical documentation.
Art Historical Appreciation
The particular artistic quality of this object lies in its convincing combination of sculptural coherence, ornamental richness and functional design. The compact body establishes a calm horizontal composition, while the widely projecting tail fin and elevated handle introduce a dynamic sense of movement and visual tension. The geometrically structured scales contrast with the comparatively restrained treatment of the head and lower body. The circular, protruding eyes lend the animal an alert, almost individual expression. At the same time, the dividing line between the lid and the lower container reveals the technical sophistication of the construction without substantially disturbing the visual unity of the sculpture. It is precisely this interaction between utilitarian object and zoomorphic sculpture that makes the vessel particularly interesting within the art historical context of Benin.
Condition Report
Basis of Examination
The present condition report is based on the eleven photographs provided, documenting the object from various perspectives, including several detailed views of the head, patina and sculptural surface decoration. No direct physical examination of the original object, metallurgical analysis or conservation assessment of the interior and the attachment points of the supporting legs has been undertaken. The following observations are therefore restricted to features visible in the photographic documentation and the explicitly reported loss of one supporting leg.
General State of Preservation
The fish-shaped container appears to retain its essential sculptural integrity. The head, body, tail fin, lateral fins and upper carrying handle are present, and their original forms remain largely discernible. The horizontal junction between the lid and the lower section is clearly visible. No extensive or continuous fracture zones in the fish's body can be conclusively identified from the photographs. Nevertheless, the metal surfaces exhibit considerable alterations, manifested in variations of colour, irregular oxidation layers, partial encrustations and traces of abrasion. On particularly exposed areas, especially around the mouth, eyes, fin attachments and supporting legs, rounding of the edges and minor surface irregularities are visible. The finely engraved scale patterns remain largely legible.
Patina, Oxidation and Corrosion
The metal surface displays a heterogeneous patina, predominantly dark brown, with areas of blackish and ochre coloration. Particularly noticeable are irregularly distributed greenish oxidation products, occurring mainly along the flanks, within the scale ornamentation, in individual recesses and at the transitions between sculptural elements. These colour variations are generally consistent with corrosion processes affecting copper-based alloys. Green patination may form part of a stable historical surface layer; under certain conditions, however, it may also indicate active corrosion processes. A reliable distinction between stable copper corrosion products and potentially active chloride-related corrosion cannot be made from photographs alone. It would be particularly important to establish whether any of the light green deposits are powdery, loosely attached or progressively developing. The existing patina should not be interpreted either as direct evidence of the object's age or as proof of any specific storage or use history.
Lid, Rim Areas and Surface Wear
The dividing line between the lid and the lower container runs relatively evenly along much of the body, although minor irregularities are visible along the contacting edges. Around the fish's mouth, the lips and adjoining rims show noticeable abrasion and locally uneven surfaces. Whether these characteristics result exclusively from prolonged use and corrosion or whether they include minor mechanical damage cannot be conclusively determined from the photographs. The substantial dorsal handle appears to be fully preserved. Slight rounding and surface alterations can be observed on the fins and tail section. No functional examination of the lid has been carried out; consequently, its actual mobility and the condition of the interior metal surfaces remain undetermined.
Conservation Assessment and Recommendations
Based on the photographic evidence, the container may be described as largely preserved in its sculptural form, although it exhibits a significant structural loss and pronounced alterations to the metal surface. The absence of the fourth supporting leg should be explicitly recorded in the conservation documentation. The three surviving legs provide the sculpture with sufficient stability for it to stand, although careful handling remains advisable. Furthermore, a professional examination of the greenish corrosion areas is recommended in order to exclude the possibility of active corrosion processes. Until their condition has been clarified, fluctuations in humidity should be avoided and changes to the surface should be monitored regularly. Uncontrolled cleaning, polishing, chemical patina treatment or structural additions should be avoided. Reconstruction of the missing supporting leg should only be considered following a professional conservation assessment.
Summary of Condition
The overall state of preservation may be described as satisfactory, with one significant loss of original material and partially developed corrosion phenomena. The overall sculptural appearance, together with the principal iconographic and ornamental features, remains intact. The greenish oxidation areas should be examined by a qualified conservator to exclude the possibility of progressive corrosion.
Literature and Comparative Objects
Ezra, Kate: Royal Art of Benin: The Perls Collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1992. Barley, Nigel: The Art of Benin. London: British Museum Press, 2010. Ben-Amos, Paula Girshick: The Art of Benin. London: British Museum Press, 1995. A particularly relevant museum comparison is the bronze or brass gourd-shaped lidded vessel in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, accession number 1991.17.66a, b. The publications and museum objects cited here provide a general art historical framework for the present work; no direct publication of this particular example, inventory number MAZ22776, in the cited literature has been established.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Make the English more natural and consistent
Catawiki does not issue Certificates of Authenticity for traditional or ancient African art objects. Our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines require sellers to provide accurate and complete information regarding the authenticity, provenance and legal origin of their objects and, where applicable, supporting documentation. The guidelines do not require such documentation to take the form of an independently issued Certificate of Authenticity in every case.
Where a seller provides a self-issued certificate or declaration concerning authenticity, this represents the seller's own statement and should not be understood as independent third-party certification or certification by Catawiki. If the listing expressly states that a Certificate of Authenticity will be provided with the object, the seller is expected to provide that document as described.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Fish-Shaped Kola Nut Container – Benin, Nigeria
Origin: Historical Kingdom of Benin, Benin City region, present-day Nigeria
Cultural attribution: Edo (Benin), stylistic attribution
Material: Cast copper alloy, traditionally referred to as bronze, with brown and partially greenish oxidation patina
Dimensions: Length 24 cm, height 11 cm
Weight: 660 g
Inventory number: MAZ22776
Dating: Not established
Provenance: No detailed information regarding the object's ownership history is documented
Description
This remarkable lidded container, entirely conceived in the form of a fish, combines the sculptural representation of an aquatic creature with the practical function of a receptacle for the storage and presentation of kola nuts. The elongated body displays a compact, gently curved silhouette, tapering towards a prominently developed, deeply forked tail fin. The broad, almost triangular head features two circular, protruding eyes and a pronounced, slightly open mouth with clearly modelled lips. A horizontal dividing line runs along the sides of the body, separating the sculpture into a lower container and a removable upper lid. The transition between the head and the body is accentuated by a curved, raised line. The dorsal surface is decorated with a carefully executed scale pattern consisting of overlapping semicircular lines and finely punched dotted fields. The lateral fins are comparatively small, while the tail fin displays a particularly differentiated structure created by closely spaced parallel incisions. A substantial, elegantly arched carrying handle rises from the back, accompanied by two smaller, hook-shaped projections. The original construction incorporated four slender supporting legs, of which three survive. The surface exhibits an irregular patina ranging predominantly from dark brown to ochre, with partially developed greenish oxidation. The combination of a cohesive sculptural form, refined ornamentation and functional construction suggests an object deliberately conceived as both a utilitarian vessel and an autonomous work of art.
Art Historical Context
In its form and iconography, the object belongs to the artistic tradition associated with the metalwork of the historical Kingdom of Benin, whose political and artistic centre was located in Benin City, in present-day southern Nigeria. The royal workshops of the Edo people, in particular, developed a highly sophisticated tradition of metal casting, producing objects that gave visual expression to political authority, religious concepts and social hierarchies. Specialist bronze casters were organised into guilds and traditionally worked in close association with the royal court. In addition to the celebrated relief plaques, commemorative heads and freestanding figures, elaborately designed vessels, boxes and ceremonial implements formed part of the repertoire of these workshops. Containers shaped as animals or plants constitute a particularly distinctive category, in which the external appearance could be directly related to the symbolic significance of the contents. The use of a copper alloy and the sophisticated surface decoration of the present fish-shaped container suggest a connection with this tradition of courtly craftsmanship. Comparable lidded vessels are documented in museum collections, including that of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Nevertheless, a definitive attribution of the present example to a historical royal workshop or a particular period of production cannot be established without additional provenance documentation and technical examination.
Symbolism and Iconography
Fish occupy an important symbolic position within the courtly imagery of Benin. The so-called mudfish, in particular, an aquatic creature associated with an amphibious existence, frequently appears in representations connected with the Oba, the King of Benin. Its ability to move between aquatic and terrestrial environments has been interpreted as a metaphor for royal authority, mediating between the human and spiritual realms. Fish imagery is also associated with Olokun, the Edo deity connected with water, the sea and wealth. Representations of fish therefore occur on royal metalwork, ornaments and ritual objects. The present fish sculpture may be considered within this iconographic framework, although its clearly articulated scales and forked tail do not permit a secure zoological identification as a mudfish. Particularly noteworthy is the complete transformation of the animal's body into a container: the sculpturally modelled mouth, prominent eyes and ornamentally structured flanks give the vessel a distinctive visual presence extending beyond its practical function. The combination of the fish form and its potentially valuable contents may evoke concepts of prosperity, protection and the symbolic relationship between water and royal authority. While such an interpretation is iconographically plausible, it cannot be regarded as a specifically documented meaning of this individual object.
Ritual and Social Function
Kola nuts possessed a significance within Benin society that extended far beyond their consumption as a stimulant. Their presentation constituted an expression of hospitality, mutual respect and social recognition. At the royal court and during ceremonial gatherings, they could be offered as symbols of political affiliation, social status or religious devotion. The opening, sharing and distribution of kola nuts were embedded in established forms of social interaction. Accordingly, elaborately fashioned containers made from wood, ivory and metal were produced, their artistic decoration emphasising the importance and value of the offering. In terms of both its construction and appearance, the present fish-shaped lidded vessel may be assigned to this category of objects. The curved handle facilitates the lifting of the lid, while the supporting legs elevate the container above the surface on which it stands. The object thus combines the functions of a storage vessel, a presentation container and a sculptural representation of symbolic significance. Whether this particular example was actually used at the court of an Oba, in the household of a high-ranking dignitary or within another ceremonial context cannot be determined in the absence of object-specific historical documentation.
Art Historical Appreciation
The particular artistic quality of this object lies in its convincing combination of sculptural coherence, ornamental richness and functional design. The compact body establishes a calm horizontal composition, while the widely projecting tail fin and elevated handle introduce a dynamic sense of movement and visual tension. The geometrically structured scales contrast with the comparatively restrained treatment of the head and lower body. The circular, protruding eyes lend the animal an alert, almost individual expression. At the same time, the dividing line between the lid and the lower container reveals the technical sophistication of the construction without substantially disturbing the visual unity of the sculpture. It is precisely this interaction between utilitarian object and zoomorphic sculpture that makes the vessel particularly interesting within the art historical context of Benin.
Condition Report
Basis of Examination
The present condition report is based on the eleven photographs provided, documenting the object from various perspectives, including several detailed views of the head, patina and sculptural surface decoration. No direct physical examination of the original object, metallurgical analysis or conservation assessment of the interior and the attachment points of the supporting legs has been undertaken. The following observations are therefore restricted to features visible in the photographic documentation and the explicitly reported loss of one supporting leg.
General State of Preservation
The fish-shaped container appears to retain its essential sculptural integrity. The head, body, tail fin, lateral fins and upper carrying handle are present, and their original forms remain largely discernible. The horizontal junction between the lid and the lower section is clearly visible. No extensive or continuous fracture zones in the fish's body can be conclusively identified from the photographs. Nevertheless, the metal surfaces exhibit considerable alterations, manifested in variations of colour, irregular oxidation layers, partial encrustations and traces of abrasion. On particularly exposed areas, especially around the mouth, eyes, fin attachments and supporting legs, rounding of the edges and minor surface irregularities are visible. The finely engraved scale patterns remain largely legible.
Patina, Oxidation and Corrosion
The metal surface displays a heterogeneous patina, predominantly dark brown, with areas of blackish and ochre coloration. Particularly noticeable are irregularly distributed greenish oxidation products, occurring mainly along the flanks, within the scale ornamentation, in individual recesses and at the transitions between sculptural elements. These colour variations are generally consistent with corrosion processes affecting copper-based alloys. Green patination may form part of a stable historical surface layer; under certain conditions, however, it may also indicate active corrosion processes. A reliable distinction between stable copper corrosion products and potentially active chloride-related corrosion cannot be made from photographs alone. It would be particularly important to establish whether any of the light green deposits are powdery, loosely attached or progressively developing. The existing patina should not be interpreted either as direct evidence of the object's age or as proof of any specific storage or use history.
Lid, Rim Areas and Surface Wear
The dividing line between the lid and the lower container runs relatively evenly along much of the body, although minor irregularities are visible along the contacting edges. Around the fish's mouth, the lips and adjoining rims show noticeable abrasion and locally uneven surfaces. Whether these characteristics result exclusively from prolonged use and corrosion or whether they include minor mechanical damage cannot be conclusively determined from the photographs. The substantial dorsal handle appears to be fully preserved. Slight rounding and surface alterations can be observed on the fins and tail section. No functional examination of the lid has been carried out; consequently, its actual mobility and the condition of the interior metal surfaces remain undetermined.
Conservation Assessment and Recommendations
Based on the photographic evidence, the container may be described as largely preserved in its sculptural form, although it exhibits a significant structural loss and pronounced alterations to the metal surface. The absence of the fourth supporting leg should be explicitly recorded in the conservation documentation. The three surviving legs provide the sculpture with sufficient stability for it to stand, although careful handling remains advisable. Furthermore, a professional examination of the greenish corrosion areas is recommended in order to exclude the possibility of active corrosion processes. Until their condition has been clarified, fluctuations in humidity should be avoided and changes to the surface should be monitored regularly. Uncontrolled cleaning, polishing, chemical patina treatment or structural additions should be avoided. Reconstruction of the missing supporting leg should only be considered following a professional conservation assessment.
Summary of Condition
The overall state of preservation may be described as satisfactory, with one significant loss of original material and partially developed corrosion phenomena. The overall sculptural appearance, together with the principal iconographic and ornamental features, remains intact. The greenish oxidation areas should be examined by a qualified conservator to exclude the possibility of progressive corrosion.
Literature and Comparative Objects
Ezra, Kate: Royal Art of Benin: The Perls Collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1992. Barley, Nigel: The Art of Benin. London: British Museum Press, 2010. Ben-Amos, Paula Girshick: The Art of Benin. London: British Museum Press, 1995. A particularly relevant museum comparison is the bronze or brass gourd-shaped lidded vessel in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, accession number 1991.17.66a, b. The publications and museum objects cited here provide a general art historical framework for the present work; no direct publication of this particular example, inventory number MAZ22776, in the cited literature has been established.
Copyright and Scientific Documentation
Some of the information and photographs have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and are based on published sources in ethnography, archaeology, and art history. Original texts and photographs may be protected by copyright. All rights held by the respective rights holders are reserved.
Make the English more natural and consistent
Catawiki does not issue Certificates of Authenticity for traditional or ancient African art objects. Our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines require sellers to provide accurate and complete information regarding the authenticity, provenance and legal origin of their objects and, where applicable, supporting documentation. The guidelines do not require such documentation to take the form of an independently issued Certificate of Authenticity in every case.
Where a seller provides a self-issued certificate or declaration concerning authenticity, this represents the seller's own statement and should not be understood as independent third-party certification or certification by Catawiki. If the listing expressly states that a Certificate of Authenticity will be provided with the object, the seller is expected to provide that document as described.
Catawiki's experts perform a virtual review based on the information, photographs, provenance and supporting documentation provided during the submission process. Acceptance of a traditional or ancient African art object for auction does not constitute independent authentication or certification by Catawiki, nor does it mean that Catawiki's expert has physically or scientifically authenticated, patina-analyzed, or dated the object. Under our Terms and Traditional African Art Submission Guidelines, the seller remains responsible for the accuracy, legality, provenance and authenticity of the object and the information provided.
Seller's Story
Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts.
For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years.
Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another.
The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation.
What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.
------------
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation.
According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts.
A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity.
Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material.
One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices.
The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material.
For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists.
This text is based on AI Information
Details
Ethnic group/ culture
Benin
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Bronze
Sold with stand
No
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A bronze sculpture
Height
11 cm
Depth
24 cm
Weight
660 kg
Authenticity
Reproduction/replica
Sold by
GermanyVerified
protop
Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers
- Unternehmen:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
- Repräsentant:
- Wolfgang Jaenicke
- Adresse:
- Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY - Telefonnummer:
- +493033951033
- Email:
- w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
- USt-IdNr.:
- DE241193499
AGB
AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.
Widerrufsbelehrung
- Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
- Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
- Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung
