A bronze sculpture - Benin - Nigeria

06
days
07
hours
04
minutes
30
seconds
Current bid
€ 36
Reserve price not met
Surya Rutten
Expert
Selected by Surya Rutten

Has over 25 years' experience in Asian art and owned an art gallery.

Estimate  € 2,200 - € 2,800
25 other people are watching this object
RO
€36
NL
€31
CH
€26

Catawiki Buyer Protection

Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details

Trustpilot 4.4 | 133504 reviews

Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.

Original bronze sculpture from Nigeria in Benin style, titled 'A bronze sculpture', weighing 15.9 kg and 53 cm high, in fair condition and sold without a stand.

AI-assisted summary

Description from the seller

The present sculptural group, depicting a male and female figure in close physical and formal relationship, invites comparison with a small but significant corpus of paired figures attributed to the artistic traditions of Ile-Ife. A particularly relevant point of reference is the fragmentary example published by Frank Willett in Ife in the History of West African Sculpture, where a comparable grouping, excavated at Ita Yemoo in 1957, is illustrated and discussed. Although that excavated fragment is less iconographically resolved, its archaeological context confirms the existence of paired figural compositions within early Ife sculptural practice and provides an important baseline for comparison.

The present work, like the example formerly exhibited by Wolfgang Jaenicke in 2018, is fragmentary, with losses to the lower extremities and a surface marked by layered oxidation. Such condition issues, while visually comparable to excavated material, must be approached cautiously, as fragmentation alone does not establish archaeological origin. Nevertheless, the surviving elements convey a highly structured composition in which two figures are rendered with notable formal balance and conceptual interdependence.

The male figure is distinguished by elaborate headgear and the holding of a horn, an attribute widely associated with rulership and ritual authority in Yoruba visual culture. The female figure, equally monumental in conception, carries an object that may be interpreted as a stylized hand or emblem of ritual efficacy. Their juxtaposition, combined with the parity of scale and the symmetry in their adornment, suggests a deliberate articulation of complementary roles rather than a hierarchical or purely narrative relationship.

While such pairings have often been interpreted as conjugal representations, a more persuasive reading situates the figures within a framework of institutional authority. In this interpretation, the male figure may be understood as the Ooni, the spiritual and political leader of Ile-Ife, while the female figure embodies a corresponding locus of power within the courtly system. Although the title and precise role of a queen mother figure in Ife differ from the more clearly codified Iyoba institution in the Kingdom of Benin, the broader principle of gendered complementarity in the exercise of authority is well attested across southern Nigerian cultures.

A particularly striking feature of the composition is the intertwining of the figures’ lower limbs. This motif, while uncommon, appears to transcend any literal suggestion of intimacy. Instead, it may be interpreted as a visual metaphor for structural interdependence, expressing the inseparability of distinct yet mutually constitutive forms of power. Such a reading aligns with Yoruba conceptions of balance and relationality in the maintenance of social and cosmic order, in which authority is not singular but distributed across complementary domains.

The question of dating remains complex. As noted in the broader literature on West African metalwork, including the work of Sylvia Dolz, the establishment of chronology cannot rely on a single line of evidence. Scientific analyses, such as thermoluminescence testing, must be evaluated in conjunction with stylistic and art-historical considerations. In the present case, a reported thermoluminescence result of approximately 310 years before present, with a significant margin of error, would place the object outside the classical floruit of Ife naturalistic sculpture, typically dated between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries. This discrepancy underscores the need for caution in attribution and highlights the possibility that the work may reflect a later continuation, reinterpretation, or regional variation of earlier sculptural traditions.

In sum, the sculpture embodies a sophisticated visual language in which authority is conceived as relational, gendered, and ritually grounded. Through its balanced composition, emblematic attributes, and intertwined forms, it articulates a conception of power that is neither singular nor hierarchical but fundamentally dual and interdependent. At the same time, the tensions between archaeological comparanda, stylistic features, and scientific dating situate the work within an ongoing scholarly discourse, in which questions of origin, chronology, and meaning remain open to critical examination
References

Dolz, Sylvia. Treasures of Africa: Benin – The Donation Baessler. Dresden: Museum of Ethnology, 2006.

Jaenicke–Njoya, Catalogue Ci104, object CAB 06943.

Willett, Frank. Ife in the History of West African Sculpture. London: Thames and Hudson, 1957.

Wolf, Siegfried. Studies on Benin Bronzes and Chronology. Various publications.

In the last 15 years we have sold two similar exemplares with different stylistic features, one on the Ife and Benin exhibition six years ago, obviously from the same artist. This exemplare was exhibited on our exhibition 2019 (last photo sequence).

This description is made with AI. Despite careful individual review, the use of Artificial Intelligence may result in errors or inaccuracies in the description. Our piece attribution and datation is given by the extent of our knowledge and for reference only. Without TL test, the piece remains subject to authentication.

TL Analysis can be made seperately from this offer by request.

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.

The present sculptural group, depicting a male and female figure in close physical and formal relationship, invites comparison with a small but significant corpus of paired figures attributed to the artistic traditions of Ile-Ife. A particularly relevant point of reference is the fragmentary example published by Frank Willett in Ife in the History of West African Sculpture, where a comparable grouping, excavated at Ita Yemoo in 1957, is illustrated and discussed. Although that excavated fragment is less iconographically resolved, its archaeological context confirms the existence of paired figural compositions within early Ife sculptural practice and provides an important baseline for comparison.

The present work, like the example formerly exhibited by Wolfgang Jaenicke in 2018, is fragmentary, with losses to the lower extremities and a surface marked by layered oxidation. Such condition issues, while visually comparable to excavated material, must be approached cautiously, as fragmentation alone does not establish archaeological origin. Nevertheless, the surviving elements convey a highly structured composition in which two figures are rendered with notable formal balance and conceptual interdependence.

The male figure is distinguished by elaborate headgear and the holding of a horn, an attribute widely associated with rulership and ritual authority in Yoruba visual culture. The female figure, equally monumental in conception, carries an object that may be interpreted as a stylized hand or emblem of ritual efficacy. Their juxtaposition, combined with the parity of scale and the symmetry in their adornment, suggests a deliberate articulation of complementary roles rather than a hierarchical or purely narrative relationship.

While such pairings have often been interpreted as conjugal representations, a more persuasive reading situates the figures within a framework of institutional authority. In this interpretation, the male figure may be understood as the Ooni, the spiritual and political leader of Ile-Ife, while the female figure embodies a corresponding locus of power within the courtly system. Although the title and precise role of a queen mother figure in Ife differ from the more clearly codified Iyoba institution in the Kingdom of Benin, the broader principle of gendered complementarity in the exercise of authority is well attested across southern Nigerian cultures.

A particularly striking feature of the composition is the intertwining of the figures’ lower limbs. This motif, while uncommon, appears to transcend any literal suggestion of intimacy. Instead, it may be interpreted as a visual metaphor for structural interdependence, expressing the inseparability of distinct yet mutually constitutive forms of power. Such a reading aligns with Yoruba conceptions of balance and relationality in the maintenance of social and cosmic order, in which authority is not singular but distributed across complementary domains.

The question of dating remains complex. As noted in the broader literature on West African metalwork, including the work of Sylvia Dolz, the establishment of chronology cannot rely on a single line of evidence. Scientific analyses, such as thermoluminescence testing, must be evaluated in conjunction with stylistic and art-historical considerations. In the present case, a reported thermoluminescence result of approximately 310 years before present, with a significant margin of error, would place the object outside the classical floruit of Ife naturalistic sculpture, typically dated between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries. This discrepancy underscores the need for caution in attribution and highlights the possibility that the work may reflect a later continuation, reinterpretation, or regional variation of earlier sculptural traditions.

In sum, the sculpture embodies a sophisticated visual language in which authority is conceived as relational, gendered, and ritually grounded. Through its balanced composition, emblematic attributes, and intertwined forms, it articulates a conception of power that is neither singular nor hierarchical but fundamentally dual and interdependent. At the same time, the tensions between archaeological comparanda, stylistic features, and scientific dating situate the work within an ongoing scholarly discourse, in which questions of origin, chronology, and meaning remain open to critical examination
References

Dolz, Sylvia. Treasures of Africa: Benin – The Donation Baessler. Dresden: Museum of Ethnology, 2006.

Jaenicke–Njoya, Catalogue Ci104, object CAB 06943.

Willett, Frank. Ife in the History of West African Sculpture. London: Thames and Hudson, 1957.

Wolf, Siegfried. Studies on Benin Bronzes and Chronology. Various publications.

In the last 15 years we have sold two similar exemplares with different stylistic features, one on the Ife and Benin exhibition six years ago, obviously from the same artist. This exemplare was exhibited on our exhibition 2019 (last photo sequence).

This description is made with AI. Despite careful individual review, the use of Artificial Intelligence may result in errors or inaccuracies in the description. Our piece attribution and datation is given by the extent of our knowledge and for reference only. Without TL test, the piece remains subject to authentication.

TL Analysis can be made seperately from this offer by request.

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change.

Details

Ethnic group/ culture
Benin
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Bronze
Sold with stand
No
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A bronze sculpture
Height
53 cm
Weight
15.9 kg
Authenticity
Original/official
GermanyVerified
6240
Objects sold
99.7%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

Similar objects

For you in

African & Tribal Art