Eine Skulptur aus Holz - Lobi - Burkina Faso

05
Tage
11
Stunden
52
Minuten
34
Sekunden
Aktuelles Gebot
€ 200
Mindestpreis nicht erreicht
Julien Gauthier
Experte
Von Julien Gauthier ausgewählt

Zehn Jahre Erfahrung auf dem Gebiet historischer Waffen und Rüstungen sowie afrikanischer Kunst.

Schätzung  € 1.800 - € 2.000
18 andere Benutzer beobachten dieses Objekt
PT
200 €
RO
185 €
PT
175 €

Käuferschutz auf Catawiki

Ihre Zahlung wird von uns sicher verwahrt, bis Sie Ihr Objekt erhalten.Details ansehen

Trustpilot 4.4 | 136208 Bewertungen

Auf Trustpilot als hervorragend bewertet.

Eine hölzerne Skulptur mit dem Titel A wooden sculpture aus Burkina Faso von den Lobi, dem bekannten Carver Bimtiote Dah zugeschrieben; Gewicht 2,4 kg, Höhe 64 cm, Zustand fair, ohne Sockel.

KI-gestützte Zusammenfassung

Vom Verkäufer bereitgestellte Beschreibung

A male sculpture attributed to Bimtiote Dah from the Lobi region of Ivory Coast stands upon a dark grey stepped base with wedge-shaped feet and straight, uninterrupted legs rising vertically from the platform. The elongated torso is framed by equally straight arms that fall closely along the sides of the body, while the shoulders are slightly raised and gently rounded. A thick, columnar neck supports an oval head whose features convey a calm and contemplative expression. The figure is carved from a dense, dark wood—possibly sankolo—whose surface now appears somewhat faded with age. Traces of old insect damage are visible on the left shoulder, contributing to the sculpture’s material history and patina.

The informant Binate Kambou with a sculpture of Bimtiote Dah (pre-last photo sequence).

The identification of the sculptor by name was achieved in 2008 through information provided by the Lobi informant Binaté Kambou. According to his testimony, the artist’s birthplace lay near the town of Bouna in Ivory Coast. The carver’s name, he stated, was Bimtiote Dah. Dah worked in the vicinity of Sansana, approximately twenty kilometres south of Gaoua, in the border region between Ivory Coast and Burkina Faso. He died in the early 1990s at roughly seventy years of age. Dah had only one son, who continued ritual activities in the region as a diviner before later settling near Gongonbili in Burkina Faso (status as of 2008). The art dealer Adama Poujougou of Bamako—who in earlier decades had supplied works to the prominent dealers Hélène Leloup and Henri Kamer—confirmed that this Lobi sculptor had once been known locally and had achieved a certain reputation for his works among the Lobi themselves.

Today, according to Poujougou, sculptures by Bimtiote Dah have become rare, largely because “the carver died long ago.” Although the dealer recognized the distinctive character of the sculptures, he did not know the artist’s name. Binaté Kambou, however, was an important informant for numerous ethnologists conducting field research in Lobi territory. Among them was the German ethnologist Klaus Schneider, later director of the Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum in Cologne, who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the so-called “Elephant House” belonging to Kambou’s father. Kambou also assisted independent researchers such as Petra Schütz and Detlev Linse, through whom the present author first came into contact with him.

Son bimtiote dah (penultimate photo sequence).

The sculptor’s son, Kermité Dah (born 1956), served as a ritual specialist and feticheur in the village of Gongonbili and was living in Burkina Faso in 2008. He confirmed that the sculptures documented in this context were works created by his father.

Within Lobi sculpture the attribution of works to a specific individual carver is relatively rare. Most objects were produced within workshop environments, and the identities of their makers were seldom recorded or preserved. When a name such as Bimtiote Dah emerges, it usually indicates either an artist of exceptional local reputation or a workshop tradition associated with a particular locality. According to the documentation of Wolfgang Jaenicke, Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–1990) was active in the region between Bouna in Ivory Coast and Gaoua in Burkina Faso and formed part of a workshop lineage distinguished by a strong and recognizable stylistic identity. His sculptures frequently demonstrate a restrained formal language and a preference for balanced or paired compositions, characteristics consistent with the aesthetic traditions of the Southern Lobi.

Jaenicke’s research—based in part on interviews with Dah’s son, who continued to serve locally as a ritual specialist—confirms that a number of sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah have appeared in prominent European auctions and collections. Such documentation lends these figures both historical and cultural legitimacy, situating them within a traceable lineage of production and within a broader framework of verified provenance and stylistic continuity.

In contrast to the Western artistic tradition, where aesthetic autonomy is frequently celebrated as an end in itself, Lobi sculpture is inseparably bound to function. A Lobi figure does not exist as “art” in the museum sense until it has been removed from its original context. In situ it is understood as an active presence—an entity rather than a representation. Within the domestic shrine it participates in a living system of ritual practice: it is addressed, fed through offerings, consulted through divination, and at times feared as the embodied locus of spiritual agency. Once removed from this environment, however, the figure undergoes a profound ontological transformation. It shifts from sacred instrument to cultural artifact, from an operative presence within a cosmological order to an object of aesthetic contemplation.

This transition raises important questions concerning the ethics of collecting, displaying, and interpreting such works. What is lost when an object that was once ritually nourished, spoken to, and feared becomes part of a private collection or museum inventory? What does it mean to isolate the visual form from the spiritual framework that originally animated it—to separate the object from the ontology within which it once functioned? These questions are not merely theoretical. They touch on the broader tension between the preservation of material culture and the inevitable transformation of meaning that occurs when ritual objects circulate within global systems of art historical classification and market exchange.

photo: wj Examples of the Bitiote Dah workshop (last photo seuence).

Yet the international appreciation of Lobi sculpture has also drawn attention to the philosophical depth of West African spiritual traditions. Collectors and scholars alike have noted the distinctive resistance of the Lobi to colonial centralization and missionary restructuring—historical circumstances that contributed to the relative continuity of their ritual practices and the preservation of their material culture in forms often more intact than those found in neighboring regions. The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah therefore exist not only as striking formal compositions but also as nodes within a dense network of ritual practice, metaphysical belief, historical resilience, and contemporary revaluation.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Within this context, a Lobi sculpture attributed to Dah must be understood as more than a compelling sculptural object. It is the material residue of a worldview in which the visible and invisible are intimately intertwined, and in which carved wood serves as a mediator between human life and the realm of spiritual forces. The quiet gravity of such figures thus speaks not only to the skill of an individual sculptor but also to the enduring intellectual and spiritual coherence of Lobi culture itself—a worldview in which matter and spirit remain deeply and inseparably entangled.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Dah is believed to have been born around 1920 near the town of Bouna in present-day Ivory Coast, though his activity is more closely associated with villages in the Lobi region around Gaoua in southern Burkina Faso. Accounts collected from local informants situate him among a group of highly respected ritual specialists who combined carving with knowledge of local religious practices. The first explicit identification of the sculptor by name appears to have emerged through oral testimony gathered in the region, notably from the Lobi informant Binathé Kambou, who recognized specific sculptures as the work of Bimtiote Dah. This attribution was subsequently confirmed by the sculptor’s son, himself active as a ritual specialist in the family village of Sansana. The convergence of these testimonies, recorded during research conducted in the early twenty-first century, provided the basis for the recognition of Bimtiote Dah as an individual artist within the Lobi tradition.

Within Lobi cosmology the carved wooden figures commonly known as bateba serve as material embodiments or intermediaries for spiritual forces called thila. These spirits are believed to inhabit the landscape and to communicate with humans through diviners, prescribing the creation of particular sculptural forms in order to restore equilibrium within the household or community. The resulting figures are therefore not conceived as aesthetic objects in the Western sense but as functional agents intended to mediate protection, healing, or moral order.

The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah participate fully in this religious framework yet display a distinctive formal coherence that has attracted the attention of collectors and scholars of African art. His figures typically stand in a strong frontal pose, carved from a single block of hardwood and characterized by a compact volumetric structure. The bodies are often rendered with an emphatic verticality, broad shoulders, and slightly shortened limbs, producing a sense of mass and stability. Facial features tend toward geometric simplification: the head is frequently cylindrical or slightly elongated, with deeply set eyes and a restrained, closed expression that contributes to the solemnity of the figure’s presence. Surface treatment is generally spare, allowing the essential forms of the sculpture to dominate. Over time the wood develops a dense patina through ritual handling and the application of sacrificial substances, traces of which often remain visible on surviving works.

Such formal characteristics situate Dah’s sculptures within the broader corpus of Lobi carving while also revealing a particular sensitivity to proportion and balance. Scholars have noted the sculptor’s preference for concentrated volumes and minimal ornamentation, qualities that produce a striking visual gravity. Although comparisons have sometimes been drawn between the frontal monumentality of these figures and the compositional principles of ancient Mediterranean or Egyptian statuary, these similarities arise independently within the Lobi cultural context and reflect the sculptor’s concern with the spiritual efficacy rather than the representational accuracy of the form.

The recognition of Bimtiote Dah as a named artist illustrates the methodological challenges inherent in the study of African sculpture produced outside written artistic traditions. Attributions often rely on a combination of stylistic analysis, field research, and the memories of local communities who retain knowledge of past carvers and ritual specialists. In the case of Dah, the identification by Binathé Kambou and the confirmation by the artist’s son have provided a rare documentary anchor for a body of works whose stylistic coherence had long suggested the presence of an individual master.

Today sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah appear in important private collections and in museums devoted to African art. Their presence in these contexts reflects the broader transformation of ritual objects into works valued within the global art market and museum system, a shift that began during the twentieth century as European and American collectors developed an increasing interest in the sculptural traditions of West Africa. At the same time, the original religious significance of such figures remains central to their interpretation. Within Lobi communities the bateba were never intended as isolated works of art but as participants in a living spiritual network linking human beings, ancestors, and the unseen forces that govern the natural and moral order.

In this sense the work of Bimtiote Dah occupies a complex position between local religious practice and international recognition. His sculptures continue to testify to the vitality of Lobi spiritual traditions while also illustrating the ways in which individual artistic voices could emerge within those traditions, even in the absence of written documentation or formal artistic institutions. Through their restrained forms and concentrated presence, the figures attributed to Dah convey the profound seriousness with which sculpture functioned within Lobi society, embodying the protective and mediating powers entrusted to them by the spiritual world.

Publizierte Werke von Bimtioté Dah

Ketterer Münshen 12/1989, Nr. 133
Christies NY 11/194, Nr.131
St. Germain-en-Laye 11/1995, Nr. 170
Massa Laurent 2001, Vereinigte Staaten 116, Nr. 80
Sigals 06/2002, S. 116, Nr. 80
Simon Blais Montreal 2007, Vereinigte Staaten 12, Nr. 130
Qittenbaum München 2008, Nr. 80
Sammlung Greschik, 2016,Werkgruppe 1, S. 128/129.

Ausgestellt 2016 in Wittenberg
die Sammlung Rainer Greschik Lobi,
Die Entdeckung des Individuums 2016

Sammlung Katsouros
Sammlung Greschik
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke

CAB38191

Der Verkäufer stellt sich vor

Wolfram Jaenickes Engagement mit afrikanischer Kunst begann nicht im Feld oder auf dem Markt, sondern in einem ruhigeren, inneren Raum – unter Papieren, Büchern und Objekten, die seinem Vater gehörten. Das Archiv über Deutschlands ehemalige Kolonien war nicht darauf angelegt, eine einzige Geschichte zu erzählen; es schlug viele vor. Es lud zur Prüfung ein statt zur Verehrung und lehrte Jaenicke früh, dass Objekte nie stumm sind. Sie tragen Zeit in sich – Bruchstelle und Kontinuität in derselben Form – und sie bitten darum, so sorgfältig gelesen zu werden wie Texte. Seit mehr als einem Vierteljahrhundert wirkt Jaenicke als Sammler, Händler und Vermittler, auch wenn keines dieser Begriffe die Gestalt seiner Praxis ganz erfassen kann. Was früher zu großzügig unter der Rubrik „Tribal Art“ zusammengefasst wurde, erschien ihm nie als ein versiegelter oder historischer Katalog. Es ist vielmehr ein Satz lebender Traditionen, der ständig mit der Gegenwart verhandelt. Seine akademische Ausbildung – Ethnologie, Kunstgeschichte und сравнende Rechtslehre – lieferte eine Grammatik. Die Sprache selbst erlernte er an anderer Stelle. In Mali, Kamerun, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo und Ghana kam Wissen langsam hervor, durch wiederholte Begegnungen, die sich zu Beziehungen verdichteten, und durch Vertrauen, das nicht auf einmal, sondern über Jahre aufgebaut wurde. Mali wurde zum Gravitationszentrum dieser Erfahrung. Zwischen 2002 und 2012 lebte und arbeitete Jaenicke in Bamako und Ségou, wo er Tribalartforum leitete, eine Galerie mit Blick auf den Niger. Der Raum widerstand leichter Chronologie. Skulpturen und Keramik teilten den Raum mit Fotografie, und Werke von Malick Sidibé – Bilder von malischer Jugend in den 1970er Jahren, selbstbewusst und ausgelassen – hingen neben älteren rituellen Formen. Die Wirkung war nicht nostalgisch, sondern klärend: Vergangenheit und Gegenwart schlossen sich nicht gegenseitig aus; sie schärften einander. Der Krieg von 2012 beendete dieses Kapitel abrupt, wie Kriege es neigen zu tun. Doch löste er die Arbeit nicht auf. Zusammen mit Aguibou Kamaté rief Jaenicke sich in Lomé, näher an die Orte heran, von denen viele Objekte stammen und auf denen sie weiterreisen. Seit 2018 ist Berlin ein weiterer Punkt auf dieser Karte geworden. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke arbeitet nun gegenüber dem Schloss Charlottenburg, unterstützt von einem kleinen Team von Spezialisten. Ihr Schwerpunkt liegt insbesondere auf westafrikanischen Bronzen und Terrakotten – Materialien, die von Erde und Feuer geformt sind, sowie auf Formen des Gedächtnisses, die sich einer leichten Übersetzung widersetzen. Was Jaenickes Praxis auszeichnet, ist nicht nur ihr geografischer Umfang, sondern ihre innere Spannung. Feldforschung geht mit Provenienzforschung einher; Handel wird als untrennbar von Verantwortung betrachtet. In Zusammenarbeit mit Museen und wissenschaftlichen Initiativen wird der Kreislauf nicht als Ausgrabung, sondern als ethischer Prozess dargestellt, der unvollendet bleibt. Ziel ist es, Objekte nicht aus der Welt zu entfernen und abzuschotten, sondern sie innerhalb der Welt lesbar zu halten – ihnen zu ermöglichen, weiter zu sprechen, auch wenn sich die Bedingungen ihrer Rede ändern. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke ist eine in Berlin ansässige Galerie, die sich auf westafrikanische Skulptur, Bronzen, Terrakotten, Masken und zeitgenössische afrikanische Kunst spezialisiert hat. Sie wird von Wolfgang Jaenicke geleitet, dessen Arbeit Sammeln, Handel, Provenienzforschung, Feldforschung und archivische Dokumentation verbindet. Laut dem eigenen Profil der Galerie studierte Jaenicke Ethnologie, Kunstgeschichte und vergleichende Rechtslehre und arbeitet seit mehr als fünfundzwanzig Jahren im Bereich afrikanischer Kunst. Seine Tätigkeiten entwickelten sich durch langfristiges Engagement in Ländern wie Mali, Kamerun, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana und Togo. Anstatt afrikanische Kunst als geschlossene historische Kategorie zu präsentieren, beschreibt er sie als eine fortdauernde kulturelle Tradition, geprägt von lebendigen Gemeinschaften und wandelnden historischen Kontexten. Eine besonders wichtige Phase seiner Karriere war Mali, wo er zwischen ca. 2002 und 2012 in Bamako und Ségou lebte und arbeitete. Dort führte er Tribalartforum, eine Galerie, die historische afrikanische Skulptur mit zeitgenössischer afrikanischer Fotografie verband, darunter Werke von Malick Sidibé. Die politische und militärische Krise in Mali im Jahr 2012 führte zur Schließung dieser Aktivität. Später setzte Jaenicke, gemeinsam mit Aguibou Kamaté, seine Arbeit von Lomé, Togo, aus fort, bevor er eine Galerier Präsenz in Berlin nahe dem Schloss Charlottenburg gründete. Die Galerie legt besonderen Wert auf westafrikanische Bronzen, Terrakotten, Benin- und Ife-bezogene Werke, Nok-Skulpturen, Dogon-Kunst, Baule-Skulpturen, Senufo-Objekte und Yoruba-Material. Ein besonderes Merkmal von Jaenickes öffentlicher Haltung ist sein wiederholter Fokus auf Transparenz der Provenienz und Restitutionsdebatten. In mehreren veröffentlichten Objektakten diskutiert die Galerie ausdrücklich Themen rund um Exportdokumentation, UNESCO-Konventionen, Besitzverhältnisse und den Austausch mit Wissenschaftlern und Restitutionsforschern. Diese Aussagen spiegeln breitere zeitgenössische Debatten über die Zirkulation afrikanischen Kulturerbes, Rechtslage, Sammlerhistorie und Museumsankäufe wider. Die Galerie führt umfangreiche Online-Archive und Kataloge, die Hunderte afrikanischer Objekte dokumentieren, darunter Benin- und Ife-Bronzen, Nok-Terrakotten, Dogon-Skulpturen, Baule-Figuren, Fon-Objekte, Moba-Figuren und weiteres westafrikanisches Material. Für Forschende, die sich für die Geschichte des afrikanischen Kunsthandels interessieren, repräsentiert Jaenicke eine spätere Generation von Händlern im Vergleich zu Persönlichkeiten wie John J. Klejman. Während Klejman dem Nachkriegsmarkt New Yorks der 1950er–1970er Jahre zugehörte, ist Jaenickes Arbeit von gegenwärtigen Anliegen geprägt: Felddokumentation, Provenienzforschung, Restitutionsdiskussionen, digitale Archive und direkte Verbindung mit westafrikanischen Netzwerken und Künstlern. Dieser Text basiert auf KI-Informationen
Übersetzt mit Google Übersetzer

A male sculpture attributed to Bimtiote Dah from the Lobi region of Ivory Coast stands upon a dark grey stepped base with wedge-shaped feet and straight, uninterrupted legs rising vertically from the platform. The elongated torso is framed by equally straight arms that fall closely along the sides of the body, while the shoulders are slightly raised and gently rounded. A thick, columnar neck supports an oval head whose features convey a calm and contemplative expression. The figure is carved from a dense, dark wood—possibly sankolo—whose surface now appears somewhat faded with age. Traces of old insect damage are visible on the left shoulder, contributing to the sculpture’s material history and patina.

The informant Binate Kambou with a sculpture of Bimtiote Dah (pre-last photo sequence).

The identification of the sculptor by name was achieved in 2008 through information provided by the Lobi informant Binaté Kambou. According to his testimony, the artist’s birthplace lay near the town of Bouna in Ivory Coast. The carver’s name, he stated, was Bimtiote Dah. Dah worked in the vicinity of Sansana, approximately twenty kilometres south of Gaoua, in the border region between Ivory Coast and Burkina Faso. He died in the early 1990s at roughly seventy years of age. Dah had only one son, who continued ritual activities in the region as a diviner before later settling near Gongonbili in Burkina Faso (status as of 2008). The art dealer Adama Poujougou of Bamako—who in earlier decades had supplied works to the prominent dealers Hélène Leloup and Henri Kamer—confirmed that this Lobi sculptor had once been known locally and had achieved a certain reputation for his works among the Lobi themselves.

Today, according to Poujougou, sculptures by Bimtiote Dah have become rare, largely because “the carver died long ago.” Although the dealer recognized the distinctive character of the sculptures, he did not know the artist’s name. Binaté Kambou, however, was an important informant for numerous ethnologists conducting field research in Lobi territory. Among them was the German ethnologist Klaus Schneider, later director of the Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum in Cologne, who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the so-called “Elephant House” belonging to Kambou’s father. Kambou also assisted independent researchers such as Petra Schütz and Detlev Linse, through whom the present author first came into contact with him.

Son bimtiote dah (penultimate photo sequence).

The sculptor’s son, Kermité Dah (born 1956), served as a ritual specialist and feticheur in the village of Gongonbili and was living in Burkina Faso in 2008. He confirmed that the sculptures documented in this context were works created by his father.

Within Lobi sculpture the attribution of works to a specific individual carver is relatively rare. Most objects were produced within workshop environments, and the identities of their makers were seldom recorded or preserved. When a name such as Bimtiote Dah emerges, it usually indicates either an artist of exceptional local reputation or a workshop tradition associated with a particular locality. According to the documentation of Wolfgang Jaenicke, Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–1990) was active in the region between Bouna in Ivory Coast and Gaoua in Burkina Faso and formed part of a workshop lineage distinguished by a strong and recognizable stylistic identity. His sculptures frequently demonstrate a restrained formal language and a preference for balanced or paired compositions, characteristics consistent with the aesthetic traditions of the Southern Lobi.

Jaenicke’s research—based in part on interviews with Dah’s son, who continued to serve locally as a ritual specialist—confirms that a number of sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah have appeared in prominent European auctions and collections. Such documentation lends these figures both historical and cultural legitimacy, situating them within a traceable lineage of production and within a broader framework of verified provenance and stylistic continuity.

In contrast to the Western artistic tradition, where aesthetic autonomy is frequently celebrated as an end in itself, Lobi sculpture is inseparably bound to function. A Lobi figure does not exist as “art” in the museum sense until it has been removed from its original context. In situ it is understood as an active presence—an entity rather than a representation. Within the domestic shrine it participates in a living system of ritual practice: it is addressed, fed through offerings, consulted through divination, and at times feared as the embodied locus of spiritual agency. Once removed from this environment, however, the figure undergoes a profound ontological transformation. It shifts from sacred instrument to cultural artifact, from an operative presence within a cosmological order to an object of aesthetic contemplation.

This transition raises important questions concerning the ethics of collecting, displaying, and interpreting such works. What is lost when an object that was once ritually nourished, spoken to, and feared becomes part of a private collection or museum inventory? What does it mean to isolate the visual form from the spiritual framework that originally animated it—to separate the object from the ontology within which it once functioned? These questions are not merely theoretical. They touch on the broader tension between the preservation of material culture and the inevitable transformation of meaning that occurs when ritual objects circulate within global systems of art historical classification and market exchange.

photo: wj Examples of the Bitiote Dah workshop (last photo seuence).

Yet the international appreciation of Lobi sculpture has also drawn attention to the philosophical depth of West African spiritual traditions. Collectors and scholars alike have noted the distinctive resistance of the Lobi to colonial centralization and missionary restructuring—historical circumstances that contributed to the relative continuity of their ritual practices and the preservation of their material culture in forms often more intact than those found in neighboring regions. The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah therefore exist not only as striking formal compositions but also as nodes within a dense network of ritual practice, metaphysical belief, historical resilience, and contemporary revaluation.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Within this context, a Lobi sculpture attributed to Dah must be understood as more than a compelling sculptural object. It is the material residue of a worldview in which the visible and invisible are intimately intertwined, and in which carved wood serves as a mediator between human life and the realm of spiritual forces. The quiet gravity of such figures thus speaks not only to the skill of an individual sculptor but also to the enduring intellectual and spiritual coherence of Lobi culture itself—a worldview in which matter and spirit remain deeply and inseparably entangled.

Bimtiote Dah (ca. 1920–early 1990s) is regarded as one of the few identifiable master sculptors within the Lobi carving tradition of southwestern Burkina Faso and the adjacent regions of northeastern Ivory Coast. His work belongs to the sculptural culture of the Lobi peoples, whose settlements extend across the borderlands of Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, and Ghana. In this region wood sculpture has historically been produced for ritual and domestic religious use rather than for artistic recognition, and individual carvers were seldom documented by name. The attribution of a body of works to Bimtiote Dah therefore represents an unusual case in the historiography of West African sculpture, where the identification of specific hands or workshops has often been possible only through stylistic analysis and oral testimony.

Dah is believed to have been born around 1920 near the town of Bouna in present-day Ivory Coast, though his activity is more closely associated with villages in the Lobi region around Gaoua in southern Burkina Faso. Accounts collected from local informants situate him among a group of highly respected ritual specialists who combined carving with knowledge of local religious practices. The first explicit identification of the sculptor by name appears to have emerged through oral testimony gathered in the region, notably from the Lobi informant Binathé Kambou, who recognized specific sculptures as the work of Bimtiote Dah. This attribution was subsequently confirmed by the sculptor’s son, himself active as a ritual specialist in the family village of Sansana. The convergence of these testimonies, recorded during research conducted in the early twenty-first century, provided the basis for the recognition of Bimtiote Dah as an individual artist within the Lobi tradition.

Within Lobi cosmology the carved wooden figures commonly known as bateba serve as material embodiments or intermediaries for spiritual forces called thila. These spirits are believed to inhabit the landscape and to communicate with humans through diviners, prescribing the creation of particular sculptural forms in order to restore equilibrium within the household or community. The resulting figures are therefore not conceived as aesthetic objects in the Western sense but as functional agents intended to mediate protection, healing, or moral order.

The sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah participate fully in this religious framework yet display a distinctive formal coherence that has attracted the attention of collectors and scholars of African art. His figures typically stand in a strong frontal pose, carved from a single block of hardwood and characterized by a compact volumetric structure. The bodies are often rendered with an emphatic verticality, broad shoulders, and slightly shortened limbs, producing a sense of mass and stability. Facial features tend toward geometric simplification: the head is frequently cylindrical or slightly elongated, with deeply set eyes and a restrained, closed expression that contributes to the solemnity of the figure’s presence. Surface treatment is generally spare, allowing the essential forms of the sculpture to dominate. Over time the wood develops a dense patina through ritual handling and the application of sacrificial substances, traces of which often remain visible on surviving works.

Such formal characteristics situate Dah’s sculptures within the broader corpus of Lobi carving while also revealing a particular sensitivity to proportion and balance. Scholars have noted the sculptor’s preference for concentrated volumes and minimal ornamentation, qualities that produce a striking visual gravity. Although comparisons have sometimes been drawn between the frontal monumentality of these figures and the compositional principles of ancient Mediterranean or Egyptian statuary, these similarities arise independently within the Lobi cultural context and reflect the sculptor’s concern with the spiritual efficacy rather than the representational accuracy of the form.

The recognition of Bimtiote Dah as a named artist illustrates the methodological challenges inherent in the study of African sculpture produced outside written artistic traditions. Attributions often rely on a combination of stylistic analysis, field research, and the memories of local communities who retain knowledge of past carvers and ritual specialists. In the case of Dah, the identification by Binathé Kambou and the confirmation by the artist’s son have provided a rare documentary anchor for a body of works whose stylistic coherence had long suggested the presence of an individual master.

Today sculptures attributed to Bimtiote Dah appear in important private collections and in museums devoted to African art. Their presence in these contexts reflects the broader transformation of ritual objects into works valued within the global art market and museum system, a shift that began during the twentieth century as European and American collectors developed an increasing interest in the sculptural traditions of West Africa. At the same time, the original religious significance of such figures remains central to their interpretation. Within Lobi communities the bateba were never intended as isolated works of art but as participants in a living spiritual network linking human beings, ancestors, and the unseen forces that govern the natural and moral order.

In this sense the work of Bimtiote Dah occupies a complex position between local religious practice and international recognition. His sculptures continue to testify to the vitality of Lobi spiritual traditions while also illustrating the ways in which individual artistic voices could emerge within those traditions, even in the absence of written documentation or formal artistic institutions. Through their restrained forms and concentrated presence, the figures attributed to Dah convey the profound seriousness with which sculpture functioned within Lobi society, embodying the protective and mediating powers entrusted to them by the spiritual world.

Publizierte Werke von Bimtioté Dah

Ketterer Münshen 12/1989, Nr. 133
Christies NY 11/194, Nr.131
St. Germain-en-Laye 11/1995, Nr. 170
Massa Laurent 2001, Vereinigte Staaten 116, Nr. 80
Sigals 06/2002, S. 116, Nr. 80
Simon Blais Montreal 2007, Vereinigte Staaten 12, Nr. 130
Qittenbaum München 2008, Nr. 80
Sammlung Greschik, 2016,Werkgruppe 1, S. 128/129.

Ausgestellt 2016 in Wittenberg
die Sammlung Rainer Greschik Lobi,
Die Entdeckung des Individuums 2016

Sammlung Katsouros
Sammlung Greschik
Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke

CAB38191

Der Verkäufer stellt sich vor

Wolfram Jaenickes Engagement mit afrikanischer Kunst begann nicht im Feld oder auf dem Markt, sondern in einem ruhigeren, inneren Raum – unter Papieren, Büchern und Objekten, die seinem Vater gehörten. Das Archiv über Deutschlands ehemalige Kolonien war nicht darauf angelegt, eine einzige Geschichte zu erzählen; es schlug viele vor. Es lud zur Prüfung ein statt zur Verehrung und lehrte Jaenicke früh, dass Objekte nie stumm sind. Sie tragen Zeit in sich – Bruchstelle und Kontinuität in derselben Form – und sie bitten darum, so sorgfältig gelesen zu werden wie Texte. Seit mehr als einem Vierteljahrhundert wirkt Jaenicke als Sammler, Händler und Vermittler, auch wenn keines dieser Begriffe die Gestalt seiner Praxis ganz erfassen kann. Was früher zu großzügig unter der Rubrik „Tribal Art“ zusammengefasst wurde, erschien ihm nie als ein versiegelter oder historischer Katalog. Es ist vielmehr ein Satz lebender Traditionen, der ständig mit der Gegenwart verhandelt. Seine akademische Ausbildung – Ethnologie, Kunstgeschichte und сравнende Rechtslehre – lieferte eine Grammatik. Die Sprache selbst erlernte er an anderer Stelle. In Mali, Kamerun, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo und Ghana kam Wissen langsam hervor, durch wiederholte Begegnungen, die sich zu Beziehungen verdichteten, und durch Vertrauen, das nicht auf einmal, sondern über Jahre aufgebaut wurde. Mali wurde zum Gravitationszentrum dieser Erfahrung. Zwischen 2002 und 2012 lebte und arbeitete Jaenicke in Bamako und Ségou, wo er Tribalartforum leitete, eine Galerie mit Blick auf den Niger. Der Raum widerstand leichter Chronologie. Skulpturen und Keramik teilten den Raum mit Fotografie, und Werke von Malick Sidibé – Bilder von malischer Jugend in den 1970er Jahren, selbstbewusst und ausgelassen – hingen neben älteren rituellen Formen. Die Wirkung war nicht nostalgisch, sondern klärend: Vergangenheit und Gegenwart schlossen sich nicht gegenseitig aus; sie schärften einander. Der Krieg von 2012 beendete dieses Kapitel abrupt, wie Kriege es neigen zu tun. Doch löste er die Arbeit nicht auf. Zusammen mit Aguibou Kamaté rief Jaenicke sich in Lomé, näher an die Orte heran, von denen viele Objekte stammen und auf denen sie weiterreisen. Seit 2018 ist Berlin ein weiterer Punkt auf dieser Karte geworden. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke arbeitet nun gegenüber dem Schloss Charlottenburg, unterstützt von einem kleinen Team von Spezialisten. Ihr Schwerpunkt liegt insbesondere auf westafrikanischen Bronzen und Terrakotten – Materialien, die von Erde und Feuer geformt sind, sowie auf Formen des Gedächtnisses, die sich einer leichten Übersetzung widersetzen. Was Jaenickes Praxis auszeichnet, ist nicht nur ihr geografischer Umfang, sondern ihre innere Spannung. Feldforschung geht mit Provenienzforschung einher; Handel wird als untrennbar von Verantwortung betrachtet. In Zusammenarbeit mit Museen und wissenschaftlichen Initiativen wird der Kreislauf nicht als Ausgrabung, sondern als ethischer Prozess dargestellt, der unvollendet bleibt. Ziel ist es, Objekte nicht aus der Welt zu entfernen und abzuschotten, sondern sie innerhalb der Welt lesbar zu halten – ihnen zu ermöglichen, weiter zu sprechen, auch wenn sich die Bedingungen ihrer Rede ändern. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke ist eine in Berlin ansässige Galerie, die sich auf westafrikanische Skulptur, Bronzen, Terrakotten, Masken und zeitgenössische afrikanische Kunst spezialisiert hat. Sie wird von Wolfgang Jaenicke geleitet, dessen Arbeit Sammeln, Handel, Provenienzforschung, Feldforschung und archivische Dokumentation verbindet. Laut dem eigenen Profil der Galerie studierte Jaenicke Ethnologie, Kunstgeschichte und vergleichende Rechtslehre und arbeitet seit mehr als fünfundzwanzig Jahren im Bereich afrikanischer Kunst. Seine Tätigkeiten entwickelten sich durch langfristiges Engagement in Ländern wie Mali, Kamerun, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana und Togo. Anstatt afrikanische Kunst als geschlossene historische Kategorie zu präsentieren, beschreibt er sie als eine fortdauernde kulturelle Tradition, geprägt von lebendigen Gemeinschaften und wandelnden historischen Kontexten. Eine besonders wichtige Phase seiner Karriere war Mali, wo er zwischen ca. 2002 und 2012 in Bamako und Ségou lebte und arbeitete. Dort führte er Tribalartforum, eine Galerie, die historische afrikanische Skulptur mit zeitgenössischer afrikanischer Fotografie verband, darunter Werke von Malick Sidibé. Die politische und militärische Krise in Mali im Jahr 2012 führte zur Schließung dieser Aktivität. Später setzte Jaenicke, gemeinsam mit Aguibou Kamaté, seine Arbeit von Lomé, Togo, aus fort, bevor er eine Galerier Präsenz in Berlin nahe dem Schloss Charlottenburg gründete. Die Galerie legt besonderen Wert auf westafrikanische Bronzen, Terrakotten, Benin- und Ife-bezogene Werke, Nok-Skulpturen, Dogon-Kunst, Baule-Skulpturen, Senufo-Objekte und Yoruba-Material. Ein besonderes Merkmal von Jaenickes öffentlicher Haltung ist sein wiederholter Fokus auf Transparenz der Provenienz und Restitutionsdebatten. In mehreren veröffentlichten Objektakten diskutiert die Galerie ausdrücklich Themen rund um Exportdokumentation, UNESCO-Konventionen, Besitzverhältnisse und den Austausch mit Wissenschaftlern und Restitutionsforschern. Diese Aussagen spiegeln breitere zeitgenössische Debatten über die Zirkulation afrikanischen Kulturerbes, Rechtslage, Sammlerhistorie und Museumsankäufe wider. Die Galerie führt umfangreiche Online-Archive und Kataloge, die Hunderte afrikanischer Objekte dokumentieren, darunter Benin- und Ife-Bronzen, Nok-Terrakotten, Dogon-Skulpturen, Baule-Figuren, Fon-Objekte, Moba-Figuren und weiteres westafrikanisches Material. Für Forschende, die sich für die Geschichte des afrikanischen Kunsthandels interessieren, repräsentiert Jaenicke eine spätere Generation von Händlern im Vergleich zu Persönlichkeiten wie John J. Klejman. Während Klejman dem Nachkriegsmarkt New Yorks der 1950er–1970er Jahre zugehörte, ist Jaenickes Arbeit von gegenwärtigen Anliegen geprägt: Felddokumentation, Provenienzforschung, Restitutionsdiskussionen, digitale Archive und direkte Verbindung mit westafrikanischen Netzwerken und Künstlern. Dieser Text basiert auf KI-Informationen
Übersetzt mit Google Übersetzer

Details

Ethnie/ Kultur
Lobi
Herkunftsland
Burkina Faso
Material
Holz
Sold with stand
Nein
Zustand
Angemessener Zustand
Titel des Kunstwerks
A wooden sculpture
Höhe
64 cm
Gewicht
2,4 kg
Verkauft von
DeutschlandVerifiziert
6418
Verkaufte Objekte
99,46 %
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

Ähnliche Objekte

Für Sie aus der Kategorie

Afrikanische Kunst und Stammeskunst