A bronze head - Ife - Nigeria

06
days
10
hours
26
minutes
14
seconds
Current bid
€ 400
Reserve price not met
Dimitri André
Expert
Selected by Dimitri André

Holds a postgraduate degree in African studies and 15 years experience in African art.

Estimate  € 3,600 - € 4,000
PT
€400
RO
€360
PT
€340

Catawiki Buyer Protection

Your payment’s safe with us until you receive your object.View details

Trustpilot 4.4 | 141873 reviews

Rated Excellent on Trustpilot.

A bronze head, an original Ife sculpture from Nigeria, 18 cm high, weighs 940 g, sold with a stand, in fair condition.

AI-assisted summary

Description from the seller

“Ceci n’est pas un visage” brings together two conceptions of reality that at first seem far removed from one another: the highly developed realism of the art of Ife and the poetic Surrealism of René Magritte. At the centre stands the fragment of a head. It possesses eyes, a nose and a mouth, the familiar signs of a human face, yet it resists the idea of a complete visage. The breaks remain visible; substantial parts are missing. Precisely because of this incompleteness, the work raises a fundamental question: how little of a face needs to remain for us still to recognise a face? Incl stand.

The portrait art of Ife, which flourished between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries in present-day Nigeria, is renowned for a mode of representation often described as naturalistic or realistic. Its heads and figures combine precisely modelled human physiognomy with a rigorous formal order. Characteristic vertical lines structure the surfaces of many of these faces. The realism of Ife therefore cannot simply be understood as the faithful imitation of an individual person. Likeness, idealised presence, social significance and highly controlled artistic form come together to produce a distinctive reality of the image.

A fragment fundamentally alters this reality. What was once a head becomes, through loss, an object suspended between presence and absence. The fragment preserves the idea of a whole even though that whole no longer exists materially. An eye is enough for us to imagine a gaze. A mouth produces the possibility of expression. A nose continues to organise the remaining features. The viewer instinctively completes what is missing. A fragment, then, is not merely a damaged whole. It is a particular form of image in which what is absent becomes as active as what remains visible.

It is at this point that the realism of Ife encounters Magritte’s Surrealism. Magritte, too, depicted things with striking representational clarity. Bowler hats, clouds, windows, rooms and human figures appear precise, recognisable and almost ordinary. The surreal does not arise from the dissolution of visible reality, but from its seemingly rational depiction. Each individual object appears real; what becomes unreal is the relationship between those objects. It is precisely the realism of the painting that makes the contradiction convincing.

The black bowler hat, the isolated male figure, the view towards sea and sky, and the uncertain relationship between interior and exterior all evoke Magritte’s visual vocabulary. Above all, however, the phrase “Ceci n’est pas un visage” recalls Magritte’s celebrated interrogation of the relationship between image, word and object. The statement initially contradicts what seems immediately apparent. Of course we see a face. And yet we do not. What stands before us is neither a living person nor a complete head, but the image of a fragment that itself refers to an image of a once-complete human being.

Magritte’s question about the reality of representation thus acquires another dimension through its encounter with the Ife fragment. The fragment is materially part of an object, yet simultaneously a sign of a lost whole. It is matter and imagination, presence and absence. Its damaged condition exposes a distinction between the head and the face: the head is a physical, sculptural form, while the visage is to a considerable degree created through perception. We assemble its parts, interpret eyes as a gaze and a mouth as expression, and construct a human presence from what remains and from what is missing.

In “Ceci n’est pas un visage”, two forms of realism therefore confront one another. One relies on the extraordinary sculptural presence of the human image; the other employs the precise representation of the visible world in order to destabilise our confidence in it. The realism of Ife allows the fragment, despite its losses, to retain the force of human presence. Magritte’s Surrealism makes that apparently self-evident presence uncertain.

What, then, is the fragment of a visage? The remnant of a destroyed whole, an autonomous work of art, a historical body, a sign of absence, or already a complete image reconstructed in our imagination? The fragment does not answer these questions. It keeps them open. Perhaps this is where an unexpected proximity between Ife and Magritte emerges: both demonstrate that realism does not mean that image and reality are identical. The more convincingly a face appears before us, the more insistent the question becomes: where does this face actually exist—in the object, in the image, or in the gaze of the beholder?

Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.

Invt. No. MAZ21735

TL Test Kotalla 340 years +/- 26 %

The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

“Ceci n’est pas un visage” brings together two conceptions of reality that at first seem far removed from one another: the highly developed realism of the art of Ife and the poetic Surrealism of René Magritte. At the centre stands the fragment of a head. It possesses eyes, a nose and a mouth, the familiar signs of a human face, yet it resists the idea of a complete visage. The breaks remain visible; substantial parts are missing. Precisely because of this incompleteness, the work raises a fundamental question: how little of a face needs to remain for us still to recognise a face? Incl stand.

The portrait art of Ife, which flourished between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries in present-day Nigeria, is renowned for a mode of representation often described as naturalistic or realistic. Its heads and figures combine precisely modelled human physiognomy with a rigorous formal order. Characteristic vertical lines structure the surfaces of many of these faces. The realism of Ife therefore cannot simply be understood as the faithful imitation of an individual person. Likeness, idealised presence, social significance and highly controlled artistic form come together to produce a distinctive reality of the image.

A fragment fundamentally alters this reality. What was once a head becomes, through loss, an object suspended between presence and absence. The fragment preserves the idea of a whole even though that whole no longer exists materially. An eye is enough for us to imagine a gaze. A mouth produces the possibility of expression. A nose continues to organise the remaining features. The viewer instinctively completes what is missing. A fragment, then, is not merely a damaged whole. It is a particular form of image in which what is absent becomes as active as what remains visible.

It is at this point that the realism of Ife encounters Magritte’s Surrealism. Magritte, too, depicted things with striking representational clarity. Bowler hats, clouds, windows, rooms and human figures appear precise, recognisable and almost ordinary. The surreal does not arise from the dissolution of visible reality, but from its seemingly rational depiction. Each individual object appears real; what becomes unreal is the relationship between those objects. It is precisely the realism of the painting that makes the contradiction convincing.

The black bowler hat, the isolated male figure, the view towards sea and sky, and the uncertain relationship between interior and exterior all evoke Magritte’s visual vocabulary. Above all, however, the phrase “Ceci n’est pas un visage” recalls Magritte’s celebrated interrogation of the relationship between image, word and object. The statement initially contradicts what seems immediately apparent. Of course we see a face. And yet we do not. What stands before us is neither a living person nor a complete head, but the image of a fragment that itself refers to an image of a once-complete human being.

Magritte’s question about the reality of representation thus acquires another dimension through its encounter with the Ife fragment. The fragment is materially part of an object, yet simultaneously a sign of a lost whole. It is matter and imagination, presence and absence. Its damaged condition exposes a distinction between the head and the face: the head is a physical, sculptural form, while the visage is to a considerable degree created through perception. We assemble its parts, interpret eyes as a gaze and a mouth as expression, and construct a human presence from what remains and from what is missing.

In “Ceci n’est pas un visage”, two forms of realism therefore confront one another. One relies on the extraordinary sculptural presence of the human image; the other employs the precise representation of the visible world in order to destabilise our confidence in it. The realism of Ife allows the fragment, despite its losses, to retain the force of human presence. Magritte’s Surrealism makes that apparently self-evident presence uncertain.

What, then, is the fragment of a visage? The remnant of a destroyed whole, an autonomous work of art, a historical body, a sign of absence, or already a complete image reconstructed in our imagination? The fragment does not answer these questions. It keeps them open. Perhaps this is where an unexpected proximity between Ife and Magritte emerges: both demonstrate that realism does not mean that image and reality are identical. The more convincingly a face appears before us, the more insistent the question becomes: where does this face actually exist—in the object, in the image, or in the gaze of the beholder?

Some of the information and photos are generated by artificial intelligence and is based on published sources from the fields of ethnography, archaeology, and art history documents. All information and photos are protected by copyright.

Invt. No. MAZ21735

TL Test Kotalla 340 years +/- 26 %

The seller guarantees and can prove that the object was obtained legally. The seller was informed by Catawiki that they had to provide the documentation required by the laws and regulations in their country of residence. The seller guarantees and is entitled to sell/export this object. The seller will provide all provenance information known about the object to the buyer. The seller ensures that any necessary permits are/will be arranged. The seller will inform the buyer immediately about any delays in obtaining such permits.

Seller's Story

Wolfgang Jaenicke’s engagement with African art did not begin in the field or the marketplace but in a quieter, more inward space—among papers, books, and objects that belonged to his father. The archive on Germany’s former colonies was not arranged to tell a single story; it suggested many. It invited scrutiny rather than reverence, and it taught Jaenicke early on that objects are never mute. They carry time inside them—fracture and continuity held in the same form—and they ask to be read as carefully as texts. For more than a quarter century, Jaenicke has worked as a collector, dealer, and intermediary, though none of these terms quite captures the shape of his practice. What used to be grouped, too casually, under the heading of “Tribal Art” has never appeared to him as a sealed or historical category. It is, instead, a set of living traditions, constantly negotiating the present. His academic training—in ethnology, art history, and comparative law—provided a grammar. The language itself he learned elsewhere. In Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Togo, and Ghana, knowledge emerged slowly, through repeated encounters that hardened into relationships, and through trust built not all at once but over years. Mali became the gravitational center of this experience. Between 2002 and 2012, Jaenicke lived and worked in Bamako and Ségou, where he ran Tribalartforum, a gallery overlooking the Niger River. The space resisted easy chronology. Sculptures and ceramics shared the room with photography, and works by Malick Sidibé—images of Malian youth in the 1970s, self-assured and exuberant—hung alongside older ritual forms. The effect was not nostalgic but clarifying: past and present did not cancel each other out; they sharpened one another. The war of 2012 ended this chapter abruptly, as wars tend to do. But it did not dissolve the work. Together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke regrouped in Lomé, closer to the places where many of the objects originated and to the routes they continue to travel. Since 2018, Berlin has become another point on this map. Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke now operates opposite Charlottenburg Palace, supported by a small team of specialists. Its focus rests, in particular, on West African bronzes and terracottas—materials shaped by earth and fire, and by forms of memory that resist easy translation. What distinguishes Jaenicke’s practice is not only its geographical range but its internal tension. Fieldwork is paired with provenance research; commerce is treated as inseparable from responsibility. In collaboration with museums and scholarly initiatives, circulation is framed not as extraction but as an ethical process that remains unfinished. The aim is not to remove objects from the world and seal them off, but to keep them readable within it—to allow them to continue speaking, even as the conditions of their speech change. ------------ Galerie Wolfgang Jaenicke is a Berlin-based gallery specializing in West African sculpture, bronzes, terracottas, masks, and contemporary African art. It is directed by Wolfgang Jaenicke, whose work combines collecting, dealing, provenance research, fieldwork, and archival documentation. According to the gallery’s own account, Jaenicke studied ethnology, art history, and comparative law and has worked in the field of African art for more than twenty-five years. His activities developed through long-term engagement in countries including Mali, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Togo. Rather than presenting African art as a closed historical category, he describes it as a continuing cultural tradition shaped by living communities and changing historical contexts. A particularly important phase of his career was in Mali, where he lived and worked between roughly 2002 and 2012 in Bamako and Ségou. There he operated Tribalartforum, a gallery that combined historical African sculpture with contemporary African photography, including works by Malick Sidibé. The political and military crisis in Mali in 2012 led to the closure of this phase of activity. Later, together with Aguibou Kamaté, Jaenicke continued working from Lomé, Togo, before establishing a gallery presence in Berlin near Charlottenburg Palace. The gallery places particular emphasis on West African bronzes, terracottas, Benin and Ife-related works, Nok sculpture, Dogon art, Baule sculpture, Senufo objects, and Yoruba material. One distinctive aspect of Jaenicke’s public position is his repeated emphasis on provenance transparency and restitution debates. On several published object records, the gallery explicitly discusses issues surrounding export documentation, UNESCO conventions, ownership histories, and communication with scholars and restitution researchers. These statements reflect broader contemporary debates about the circulation of African cultural heritage, legality, collecting history, and museum acquisition practices. The gallery maintains extensive online archives and catalogues documenting hundreds of African objects, including Benin and Ife bronzes, Nok terracottas, Dogon sculptures, Baule figures, Fon objects, Moba figures, and other West African material. For researchers interested in the history of the African art trade, Jaenicke represents a later generation of dealers compared with figures such as John J. Klejman. Whereas Klejman belonged to the postwar New York market of the 1950s–1970s, Jaenicke’s work has been shaped by contemporary concerns with field documentation, provenance research, restitution discussions, digital archives, and direct engagement with West African networks and artists. This text is based on AI Information

Details

Ethnic group/ culture
Ife
Country of Origin
Nigeria
Material
Bronze
Sold with stand
Yes
Condition
Fair condition
Title of artwork
A bronze head
Height
18 cm
Weight
940 g
Authenticity
Original/official
GermanyVerified
6812
Objects sold
99.8%
protop

Rechtliche Informationen des Verkäufers

Unternehmen:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Repräsentant:
Wolfgang Jaenicke
Adresse:
Jaenicke Njoya GmbH
Klausenerplatz 7
14059 Berlin
GERMANY
Telefonnummer:
+493033951033
Email:
w.jaenicke@jaenicke-njoya.com
USt-IdNr.:
DE241193499

AGB

AGB des Verkäufers. Mit einem Gebot auf dieses Los akzeptieren Sie ebenfalls die AGB des Verkäufers.

Widerrufsbelehrung

  • Frist: 14 Tage sowie gemäß den hier angegebenen Bedingungen
  • Rücksendkosten: Käufer trägt die unmittelbaren Kosten der Rücksendung der Ware
  • Vollständige Widerrufsbelehrung

Similar objects

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​

For you in

African & Tribal Art

  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​
  • ​
    ​
    ​